11-07-2016, 01:16 AM
1:51 into this video is a great example of the "boomer coaching millenial" dynamic. Streisand knows exactly what she wants, and Ridley just does it. I've cued it to the relevant portion.
(11-07-2016, 01:16 AM)Warren Dew Wrote: [ -> ]1:51 into this video is a great example of the "boomer coaching millenial" dynamic. Streisand knows exactly what she wants, and Ridley just does it. I've cued it to the relevant portion.
(11-07-2016, 12:54 PM)gabrielle Wrote: [ -> ]According to the Lifecourse website, Silent Generation was from '25 to '42. http://www.lifecourse.com/about/method/t...ation.html
Which makes both Bernie and Babs Silent Generation, but just barely. They both have prophet characteristics, to be sure.
(11-07-2016, 02:14 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: [ -> ](11-07-2016, 12:54 PM)gabrielle Wrote: [ -> ]According to the Lifecourse website, Silent Generation was from '25 to '42. http://www.lifecourse.com/about/method/t...ation.html
Which makes both Bernie and Babs Silent Generation, but just barely. They both have prophet characteristics, to be sure.
Strauss & Howe put the generational breakpoints a few years earlier than the demographic definitions. For example, the demographic definition says that people who are born in 1964 are still boomers. From a generational cohort characteristic perspective, the Strauss & Howe definitions work better.
(11-07-2016, 03:11 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry, you're right. My observation has been that 1942 births are almost always seem more boomer like, and I accept the "not old enough to understand what was going on in the crisis war" explanation for that generational changeover, so I guess I've reassigned the break point to be a year or two earlier in my mind.