02-24-2017, 07:43 AM
(02-24-2017, 02:54 AM)gabrielle Wrote: [ -> ]Then you've got the crazy Nomad aunts who are lefty feminists and "man-haters."
Oh gosh, the Xers really are going to be just like the Lost when they are old, LOL!
(02-24-2017, 02:54 AM)gabrielle Wrote: [ -> ]Then you've got the crazy Nomad aunts who are lefty feminists and "man-haters."
(02-23-2017, 08:20 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ]Trump obviously thinks intimidation works real well. We'll see how it plays out on both sides.
(02-24-2017, 01:42 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 08:34 AM)David Horn Wrote: [ -> ](02-23-2017, 08:20 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ]Trump obviously thinks intimidation works real well. We'll see how it plays out on both sides.
Trump's tactics are transparent: hammer away, don't relent and demand <insert whatever his mind is thinking today>. Many people will concede just to shut him up. He's counting on it.
An example of the "highchair tyrant" role. Some people never grow out of it because it works well for them given whatever debased life goals they happen to have.
(02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.
(02-24-2017, 04:06 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 03:27 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.
In this he is following the example of the previous Republican president.
No Eric. There is no similarity. We are in uncharted territory.
(02-24-2017, 04:20 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 04:06 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 03:27 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.
In this he is following the example of the previous Republican president.
No Eric. There is no similarity. We are in uncharted territory.
I'd acknowledge some similarity, but Trump has indeed taken the pattern well beyond into uncharted territory.
On the other hand, Trump hasn't pushed false Casus belli... at least not yet. Trump seems quite at home in uncharted territory, but Bush 43 knew how to do a Big Lie when he felt like it.
(02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.I hope blues aren't foolish enough to deny the existence of Islamic terrorism and ignore which region that it's been coming/ will be coming in from and the realities associated with the governments ( 5 currently without a formal government, 1 with a severely weakened government and one state (the largest) sponsor of terrorism) and the condition of the countries (6 hell holes with Islamic radicals and one stable society controlled by Islamic radicals ) involved in the ban and the impacts that immigration from any of them may have on us/our children as far as the future of America is concerned. I don't live in an alternate reality. I live in reality, so to speak. Do blues live in reality?
I have noted that on these forums extreme partisans can live in alternate realities where they cannot agree on what ought to be objective fact. This seems to be a problem at the highest level of government as well.
(02-25-2017, 01:06 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.I hope blues aren't foolish enough to deny the existence of Islamic terrorism and ignore which region that it's been coming/ will be coming in from and the realities associated with the governments ( 5 currently without a formal government, 1 with a severely weakened government and one state (the largest) sponsor of terrorism) and the condition of the countries (6 hell holes with Islamic radicals and one stable society controlled by Islamic radicals ) involved in the ban and the impacts that immigration from any of them may have on us/our children as far as the future of America is concerned. I don't live in an alternate reality. I live in reality, so to speak. Do blues live in reality?
I have noted that on these forums extreme partisans can live in alternate realities where they cannot agree on what ought to be objective fact. This seems to be a problem at the highest level of government as well.
(02-24-2017, 04:46 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ]As far as the so-called Big Lie, I didn't see Bush do anything to cover it up. He pretty much seemed to accept they were wrong about Saddam having an active WMD program. As far as WMD's, I've read that they found about five thousand artillery shells with sarin gas over the years that followed the invasion. Once again, I don't think blues were paying attention to the details, what was going on and being debated at the time. I understood that we were guessing about the existence of WMD's and WMD program. If I could understand it, why couldn't you or Bob understand it and accept that we were wrong about them.(02-24-2017, 04:20 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 04:06 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 03:27 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.
In this he is following the example of the previous Republican president.
No Eric. There is no similarity. We are in uncharted territory.
I'd acknowledge some similarity, but Trump has indeed taken the pattern well beyond into uncharted territory.
On the other hand, Trump hasn't pushed false Casus belli... at least not yet. Trump seems quite at home in uncharted territory, but Bush 43 knew how to do a Big Lie when he felt like it.
Yes he sure did. His intelligence agency was crafted to support his war in Iraq. Bush and Cheney designed it specifically to cook up the rationale.
Trump may take it to a level where it becomes normal procedure for lies on a daily basis. Not sure the CIA will be in his pocket on that though. He'd have to restaff the entire agency, and all similar agencies. That's certainly possible.
(02-25-2017, 01:06 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.I hope blues aren't foolish enough to deny the existence of Islamic terrorism and ignore which region that it's been coming/ will be coming in from and the realities associated with the governments ( 5 currently without a formal government, 1 with a severely weakened government and one state (the largest) sponsor of terrorism) and the condition of the countries (6 hell holes with Islamic radicals and one stable society controlled by Islamic radicals ) involved in the ban and the impacts that immigration from any of them may have on us/our children as far as the future of America is concerned. I don't live in an alternate reality. I live in reality, so to speak. Do blues live in reality?
I have noted that on these forums extreme partisans can live in alternate realities where they cannot agree on what ought to be objective fact. This seems to be a problem at the highest level of government as well.
(02-24-2017, 01:41 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 07:43 AM)Odin Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 02:54 AM)gabrielle Wrote: [ -> ]Then you've got the crazy Nomad aunts who are lefty feminists and "man-haters."
Oh gosh, the Xers really are going to be just like the Lost when they are old, LOL!
I'm going to post some clips from cylinder recordings in the near future. No joke!
Quote:The rags to riches life of P.T. Barnum (Burt Lancaster), the iconic carnival showman and co-creator of "The Greatest Show on Earth," is told in this TV movie. The elderly and still puckish Barnum recounts via flashbacks his adventures as a floundering teenage salesman and an exhibitor of human oddities, and his eventual role as the entertainer who brought attractions such as Tom Thumb (Sandor Raski) and "the Swedish Nightingale," Jenny Lind (Hanna Schygulla), to the American masses.
July 5, 1810 – April 7, 1891)
(02-25-2017, 01:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]So, are saying that they're actions aren't/weren't religiously motivated? I disagree, Abu Ackba (Praise be to God) is an obvious example of a religious expression/motive that's directly associated with Islam to me. Hint: Every Islamic terrorist attack that we have witnessed as a country has been committed by someone related to a Muslim who came here as a refugee/immigrant during the Clinton years who received some sort of clearance to come over here and live with us or by a Muslim who immigrated to/ or visited Europe and then came over here for a short term visit from some place in Europe or by a Muslim who came over here for a short term visit/ as a cleared immigrant directly from an Islamic country. That's a reality. A reality that many blues like you don't seem able to acknowledge or accept or openly state and view as being truthful and as being relevant to the rest of the American population. I'm not sure it's good idea for blues to embrace Muslims as they've been doing politically considering they're positioning themselves to be the ones who are blamed in the future for terrorist attacks.(02-25-2017, 01:06 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.I hope blues aren't foolish enough to deny the existence of Islamic terrorism and ignore which region that it's been coming/ will be coming in from and the realities associated with the governments ( 5 currently without a formal government, 1 with a severely weakened government and one state (the largest) sponsor of terrorism) and the condition of the countries (6 hell holes with Islamic radicals and one stable society controlled by Islamic radicals ) involved in the ban and the impacts that immigration from any of them may have on us/our children as far as the future of America is concerned. I don't live in an alternate reality. I live in reality, so to speak. Do blues live in reality?
I have noted that on these forums extreme partisans can live in alternate realities where they cannot agree on what ought to be objective fact. This seems to be a problem at the highest level of government as well.
I don't see the Islamic religion as being a good indicator of likelihood to commit terrorism. There are a few political entities, often associated with warlord government and failed states, that believe with some cause that committing acts of terror against the West improves recruiting. Al Qaida a while back and ISIS now can stand as examples. That's not a religious motivation. Thus, I find those calling the guilty 'Islamic terrorists' is not an indication of a reality dweller. The motivation is political and military.
I also find Middle Eastern terrorists aren't a significant threat. The death count from terror as compared to cancer of car accidents are trivial. The US attacks on organizations like ISIS are more apt to motivate ISIS to stronger efforts than to destroy ISIS. Again, see Powell's Questions. If one isn't fighting with a plausible path towards victory, perhaps you ought not to be fighting?
But there is a common gut instinct when hit to hit back. So long as any small number of terror events occur, there will be those who do something. I'm just not very inclined to do something unless it improves the situation.
(02-25-2017, 03:42 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ]<snip>
So, are saying that they're actions aren't/weren't religiously motivated? I disagree, Abu Ackba (Praise be to God) is an obvious example of a religious expression/motive that's directly associated with Islam to me. Hint: Every Islamic terrorist attack that we have witnessed as a country has been committed by someone related to a Muslim who came here as a refugee/immigrant during the Clinton years who received some sort of clearance to come over here and live with us or by a Muslim who immigrated to/ or visited Europe and then came over here for a short term visit from some place in Europe or by a Muslim who came over here for a short term visit/ as a cleared immigrant directly from an Islamic country. That's a reality. A reality that many blues like you don't seem able to acknowledge or accept or openly state and view as being truthful and as being relevant to the rest of the American population. I'm not sure it's good idea for blues to embrace Muslims as they've been doing politically considering they're positioning themselves to be the ones who are blamed in the future for terrorist attacks.
(02-25-2017, 03:42 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ]So, are saying that they're actions aren't/weren't religiously motivated? I disagree, Abu Ackba (Praise be to God) is an obvious example of a religious expression/motive that's directly associated with Islam to me. Hint: Every Islamic terrorist attack that we have witnessed as a country has been committed by someone related to a Muslim who came here as a refugee/immigrant during the Clinton years who received some sort of clearance to come over here and live with us or by a Muslim who immigrated to/ or visited Europe and then came over here for a short term visit from some place in Europe or by a Muslim who came over here for a short term visit/ as a cleared immigrant directly from an Islamic country. That's a reality. A reality that many blues like you don't seem able to acknowledge or accept or openly state and view as being truthful and as being relevant to the rest of the American population. I'm not sure it's good idea for blues to embrace Muslims as they've been doing politically considering they're positioning themselves to be the ones who are blamed in the future for terrorist attacks.
(02-25-2017, 04:22 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote: [ -> ](02-25-2017, 03:42 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ]<snip>
So, are saying that they're actions aren't/weren't religiously motivated? I disagree, Abu Ackba (Praise be to God) is an obvious example of a religious expression/motive that's directly associated with Islam to me. Hint: Every Islamic terrorist attack that we have witnessed as a country has been committed by someone related to a Muslim who came here as a refugee/immigrant during the Clinton years who received some sort of clearance to come over here and live with us or by a Muslim who immigrated to/ or visited Europe and then came over here for a short term visit from some place in Europe or by a Muslim who came over here for a short term visit/ as a cleared immigrant directly from an Islamic country. That's a reality. A reality that many blues like you don't seem able to acknowledge or accept or openly state and view as being truthful and as being relevant to the rest of the American population. I'm not sure it's good idea for blues to embrace Muslims as they've been doing politically considering they're positioning themselves to be the ones who are blamed in the future for terrorist attacks.
Like I said before, Muslims = viruses. Some may be ummmm.... "sugar coated" as to evade detection. Others have defective replication mechanisms, "moderate Muslims", and outright defective , "moderate/liberal Muslims".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus
Here are the symptoms:
https://civilusdefendus.wordpress.com/ci...-conquest/
https://www.amazon.com/Infiltration-Musl...1595552480
John X has loads of stuff on this.
(02-25-2017, 01:41 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 04:46 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ]As far as the so-called Big Lie, I didn't see Bush do anything to cover it up. He pretty much seemed to accept they were wrong about Saddam having an active WMD program. As far as WMD's, I've read that they found about five thousand artillery shells with sarin gas over the years that followed the invasion. Once again, I don't think blues were paying attention to the details, what was going on and being debated at the time. I understood that we were guessing about the existence of WMD's and WMD program. If I could understand it, why couldn't you or Bob understand it and accept that we were wrong about them.(02-24-2017, 04:20 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 04:06 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 03:27 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: [ -> ]In this he is following the example of the previous Republican president.
No Eric. There is no similarity. We are in uncharted territory.
I'd acknowledge some similarity, but Trump has indeed taken the pattern well beyond into uncharted territory.
On the other hand, Trump hasn't pushed false Casus belli... at least not yet. Trump seems quite at home in uncharted territory, but Bush 43 knew how to do a Big Lie when he felt like it.
Yes he sure did. His intelligence agency was crafted to support his war in Iraq. Bush and Cheney designed it specifically to cook up the rationale.
Trump may take it to a level where it becomes normal procedure for lies on a daily basis. Not sure the CIA will be in his pocket on that though. He'd have to restaff the entire agency, and all similar agencies. That's certainly possible.
(02-25-2017, 01:06 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.I hope blues aren't foolish enough to deny the existence of Islamic terrorism and ignore which region that it's been coming/ will be coming in from and the realities associated with the governments ( 5 currently without a formal government, 1 with a severely weakened government and one state (the largest) sponsor of terrorism) and the condition of the countries (6 hell holes with Islamic radicals and one stable society controlled by Islamic radicals ) involved in the ban and the impacts that immigration from any of them may have on us/our children as far as the future of America is concerned. I don't live in an alternate reality. I live in reality, so to speak. Do blues live in reality?
I have noted that on these forums extreme partisans can live in alternate realities where they cannot agree on what ought to be objective fact. This seems to be a problem at the highest level of government as well.
(02-25-2017, 01:06 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: [ -> ](02-24-2017, 09:44 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: [ -> ]Noting a nuance in the spin game. The main stream press is reporting that Trump is asking intelligence agencies for reports that justify policies... such as the travel ban. There is a difference between asking for a report to justify a policy and asking for a report on how effective a policy might be. He has already committed to a policy on political ground, and is asking the intelligence agencies to produce propaganda to justify the politics. They are in at least some cases declining.
I have noted that on these forums extreme partisans can live in alternate realities where they cannot agree on what ought to be objective fact. This seems to be a problem at the highest level of government as well.
I hope blues aren't foolish enough to deny the existence of Islamic terrorism and ignore which region that it's been coming/ will be coming in from and the realities associated with the governments ( 5 currently without a formal government, 1 with a severely weakened government and one state (the largest) sponsor of terrorism) and the condition of the countries (6 hell holes with Islamic radicals and one stable society controlled by Islamic radicals ) involved in the ban and the impacts that immigration from any of them may have on us/our children as far as the future of America is concerned. I don't live in an alternate reality. I live in reality, so to speak. Do blues live in reality?