![]() |
Article: The Ghosts of ’68 Haunt the Election of 2016 - Printable Version +- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum) +-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Theory Related Political Discussions (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Article: The Ghosts of ’68 Haunt the Election of 2016 (/thread-81.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Article: The Ghosts of ’68 Haunt the Election of 2016 - Galen - 05-18-2016 (05-18-2016, 12:52 AM)taramarie Wrote: So a liberal is a category and socialist or progressive would be considered a sub category within being a liberal. I get it now. I always thought a liberal was something different again. Its more like a deliberate deception to get what they wanted which was power. For example FDR ran as a fiscal conservative and then gave us the New Deal which was simply more of Hoover's intervention. After a few decades the name stuck to the wrong people. The average person doesn't make any distinction and at this stage it doesn't really matter. RE: Article: The Ghosts of ’68 Haunt the Election of 2016 - Dan '82 - 05-18-2016 (05-18-2016, 01:05 AM)taramarie Wrote:(05-18-2016, 01:01 AM)Dan Wrote:(05-18-2016, 12:52 AM)taramarie Wrote:Tara, I think the party that Roger Douglas founded after Labor booted him is basic basically a libertarian party.(05-18-2016, 12:43 AM)Galen Wrote:(05-18-2016, 12:38 AM)taramarie Wrote: Ah I see. Yes we use that term. I don't know the name, and I'm too busy editing the board to look it up. BTW I added a NZ flag smilie for you. RE: Article: The Ghosts of ’68 Haunt the Election of 2016 - Anthony '58 - 07-18-2016 No, it is the ghosts of 1860, not 1968, that haunt this election - and it will be 1860 on an even higher plane if the Reform Party nominates someone worth voting for, since that would make this a five-way screaming match instead of "only" four. |