2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Printable Version +- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum) +-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Entertainment and Media (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture (/thread-211.html) |
RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Eric the Green - 08-03-2016 (08-03-2016, 11:48 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:(08-03-2016, 11:26 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: There is a lot of sentiment out there that the 3T and 4T music isn't as good, and it would be good if real music was brought back. I would like to see people here demonstrate that the 3T produced some good pop music. Taramarie actually posted at least a few good songs, and some OK "happy" (and sexy) pop. Others posted a few good things. The Santana song I was going to post, was posted. Recently it's been mostly grunge stuff, and I don't hear music in it. But I know there were some good rock groups in the 3T, like REM, Depeche Mode, and early Maroon 5 was OK; and I thought I heard some good songs by The Cure (not posted in the 3T thread yet though), and later, Coldplay and Green Day. I think there's some good stuff that better represents "the best," even though I likely wouldn't think it is; but at least good. I don't know enough about the era and would like to learn more, without having my ears bled. So I hope you can give it a shot. Find the good stuff. It's not a matter of what generation I sympathize with; it's a question of quality. Anyone can, indeed. I can also post here that they can do better. That is my opinion. It is not subjective, as I have stated correctly. It is a combination of objective and subjective. Some music is definitely better than other music. Even if I may be wrong about which is better. It is my best perception of the music, not just my "opinion." I really wish people would get beyond this post-modern relativism that anything is as good as anything else. It ain't so. So I don't need to "remember" what ain't so. People need to "remember" what IS so. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Eric the Green - 08-03-2016 (08-03-2016, 11:35 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:(08-03-2016, 08:08 PM)taramarie Wrote:(08-03-2016, 06:22 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: I see thousands of comments on you tube videos from people young and old, similar to this: What are you nostalgic about? Something more than grungy noise I would hope. Post some good stuff to be nostalgic about, please, on the proper thread. I know it's not just about music; the 90s was a better time in many ways. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - MillsT_98 - 08-04-2016 (08-04-2016, 12:29 AM)taramarie Wrote:(08-03-2016, 11:35 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:(08-03-2016, 08:08 PM)taramarie Wrote:(08-03-2016, 06:22 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: I see thousands of comments on you tube videos from people young and old, similar to this: Yes, I was born in the late 90s, but 90s culture is very interesting and I witnessed some of it in the early 2000s. I've been immersed in the same culture so-called "90s kids" have grown up in. Because of also become nostalgic about a time before I was born though. You probably weren't nostalgic about the 90s like I was because you were older. That would be the equivalent of me being nostalgic about 2010-12. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - MillsT_98 - 08-04-2016 (08-04-2016, 01:47 AM)taramarie Wrote:(08-04-2016, 01:43 AM)MillsT_98 Wrote:(08-04-2016, 12:29 AM)taramarie Wrote:(08-03-2016, 11:35 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:(08-03-2016, 08:08 PM)taramarie Wrote: People say the same thing about 90s music. That it was better then than now. It is nostalgia talking. I thought you meant the 90s, not the 80s. I'm fond of the 2000s because it was most of my childhood as well. 1 to 11. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - MillsT_98 - 08-04-2016 (08-04-2016, 01:54 AM)taramarie Wrote: I would remember the whole 90s better than you would because i was actually there. It made me who I am From barney, captain planet, to pokemon, digimon, spice girls, boy bands, beast wars, power rangers, pogs, knuckle bones, scrunchies, slap bracelets, to furbies, tamagitchies, the lion king and all the toys as well as TMNT toy mania, Jurassic park and JP trading cards.....me not nostalgic for the 90s when it was a huge chunk of my early to teen childhood??? hahahahaha! I am 90s to the core lil buddy! You merely got the arse end of it. Sorry about that. You missed out of a treasure of a decade. Man I'm jealous of you for actually remembering the 90s! I wasn't even 2 at the turn of the new millennium! I wish I could remember the 90s like you could! RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - MillsT_98 - 08-04-2016 I might actually be the youngest person on the forum so it's weird that I don't remember much of the experiences other people had! RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - gabrielle - 08-05-2016 (08-03-2016, 01:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: I feel two ways about people liking such stuff as grunge, heavy metal, core punk, rap and shallow pop. On the one hand, as John Lennon said, whatever gets you through the night, it's all right. Whatever people enjoy is OK with me. I don't disrespect people for liking the music I don't, or vice-versa. To me, grunge embodied that balance. The music was aggressive, robust, and there was a madness to it. Yes, it was sloppy, but the sloppiness added to the emotional power. Pounding music, guys (with long, flowing romantic hair) screaming, thrashing, throwing themselves into a teeming crowd to be tossed back up again. Yet, as Mills pointed out on the other thread, the music was often melodic and sensitive, if tinged with cynicism, and they sang songs about Mother Earth, the downtrodden homeless, women trapped in abusive relationships, their own mental labyrinths. This was masculine virility with intellect, and soul--and directed toward the feminine. Not in a "oh baby I want to f*ck you" sort of way, like the hard rock bands of the two previous decades, but more towards the mystical feminine--the thoughtful, the sensitive, the vulnerable. The early 90s seemed to me like a blast of Byronic Romanticism. From wikipedia: Quote: Historian and critic Lord Macaulay described the Byronic Hero character as "a man proud, moody, cynical, with defiance on his brow, and misery in his heart, a scorner of his kind, implacable in revenge, yet capable of deep and strong affection". Sounds a bit like Kurt Cobain to me. Well, maybe without the "implacable in revenge" part. Substitute that for perverse sense of humor and self-destructive heroine addiction. And ratty cardigan sweaters. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Eric the Green - 08-05-2016 I quite disagree, and will leave it at that Of course again, if you go by what the song is "about" (i.e. the words rather than the music; Byron wrote words too, not music), you may have a point, but a point that is irrelevant to me, because to me the music and sound counts more. In the 60s, Marshall MacLuhan famously said, "the medium is the message." I pretty much agree. The music, not the words, are what counts the most. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Eric the Green - 08-11-2016 A big choir from Toronto sings songs from all 3 turnings, from The Beatles to Justin Bieber. Published on Aug 5, 2016 Turn off your mind and float downstream... 50 years of knowing, being, believing... Happy birthday to one of the greatest albums of all time. comment: fab4 2 days ago Tomorrow Never Knows is my favorite Beatles song. Watching and listening to this gave me chills and tears. I love the age differences throughout the crowd. Loved this. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Eric the Green - 10-04-2016 The generation gap does not always apply. It's too much money for me, but then, I missed Woodstock and Monterey too. http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/10/03/desert-trip-bay-area-fans-ready-for-pilgrimage-to-see-rock-legends-at-oldchella/ When the lineup was announced, music fans could hardly believe their eyes. The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan? Paul McCartney and Neil Young? Pink Floyd mastermind Roger Waters and The Who? All at one festival? Were they serious? But even though the event is booked for a Southern California desert, the lineup is no mirage. As Jerry Anderson, a 48-year-old San Jose native who now lives in Oakland, put it, “I don’t think they could put together a more epic lineup. Everyone on the bill is legendary.” That’s why Anderson and scores of other Bay Area fans are traveling hundreds of miles and, in many cases, spending thousands of dollars to take in the Desert Trip music festival in Southern California’s Coachella Valley. For them, it’s not just a music festival, it’s a once-in-a-lifetime rock ’n’ roll pilgrimage. Pat Ireland, 49, says he’s “so pumped” to be bringing his two sons — Johnny, 17, and Maddox, 13. He sees it as a chance to bond over music that bridges the generation gap. “I’ll pass by their rooms (at home) and my son is listening to Neil Young and I’m like, ‘Wow, that’s pretty cool,’” says the Brentwood resident. “They are smart kids.” Johnny Ireland adds that grooving on The Stones or Pink Floyd is not a case of accommodating dad’s geezer music tastes. “I feel like there is more passion (in classic rock),” he says. “I feel like there is more dedication that they put into their music. Most of the music now is just the same thing over and over again. Some of it is OK. But some of the older music just took a lot more work.”............ Yes, I agree, Johnny. RE: 2T Vs. 3T pop culture - Ragnarök_62 - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 01:20 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: “I feel like there is more passion (in classic rock),” he says. “I feel like there is more dedication that they put into their music. Most of the music now is just the same thing over and over again. Some of it is OK. But some of the older music just took a lot more work.”............ I agree also. "Most of the music now is just the same thing over and over again".... |