Hillary , Exposed - Printable Version +- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum) +-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Current Events (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-34.html) +---- Forum: General Political Discussion (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-15.html) +---- Thread: Hillary , Exposed (/thread-198.html) |
Hillary , Exposed - Ragnarök_62 - 06-15-2016 Thread to post upcoming Wikileaks/Russian hxr0d info wrt Hillary. Skip to content GUCCIFER 2.0 Written by guccifer2June 15, 2016 Guccifer 2.0 DNC’s servers hacked by a lone hacker Worldwide known cyber security company CrowdStrike announced that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) servers had been hacked by “sophisticated” hacker groups. I’m very pleased the company appreciated my skills so highly))) But in fact, it was easy, very easy. Guccifer may have been the first one who penetrated Hillary Clinton’s and other Democrats’ mail servers. But he certainly wasn’t the last. No wonder any other hacker could easily get access to the DNC’s servers. Shame on CrowdStrike: Do you think I’ve been in the DNC’s networks for almost a year and saved only 2 documents? Do you really believe it? Here are just a few docs from many thousands I extracted when hacking into DNC’s network. They mentioned a leaked database on Donald Trump. Did they mean this one? Some hundred sheets! This’s a serious case, isn’t it? And it’s just a tiny part of all docs I downloaded from the Democrats networks. DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said no financial documents were compromised. Nonsense! Just look through the Democratic Party lists of donors! This one Another one And another one They say there were no secret docs! Lies again! Here is a secret document from Hillary’s PC she worked with as the Secretary of State. Here are other docs: 2016 GOP presidential candidates HRC election plans NATIONAL SECURITY TRANSITION PLANNING 2.19.16 Friends of HRC List_HFA16 Giving History 4.16 Commitment Sheet_040416 Update 7.1.15 Commitment Sheet The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to Wikileaks. They will publish them soon. I guess CrowdStrike customers should think twice about company’s competence. Fuck the Illuminati and their conspiracies!!!!!!!!! Fuck CrowdStrike!!!!!!!!! Tagged CrowdStrike, cyber security, Debbie Shultz, Democratic National Commitee, Democratic Party, DNC, Donald Trump, Guccifer, Hillary Clinton, Wikileaks. Leave a Reply Text Widget This is a text widget, which allows you to add text or HTML to your sidebar. You can use them to display text, links, images, HTML, or a combination of these. Edit them in the Widget section of the Customizer. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. The Escutcheon Theme. Follow Follow “GUCCIFER 2.0” Get every new post delivered to your Inbox. Build a website with WordPress.com RE: Hillary , Exposed - Ragnarök_62 - 06-15-2016 11th image , only 10 images allowed per post. RE: Hillary , Exposed - Ragnarök_62 - 06-15-2016 snarfed Hillary stuff Wrote: NATIONAL SECURITY TRANSITION PLANNING
The 44th President of the United States will take office at a time of great opportunity and peril for the United States, The country is in the middle of two hot wars (Iraq and Afghanistan) and a deadly struggle against terrorists seeking to harm the United States. Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability is on a fast track requiring prompt international action. Key and consequential decisions on energy and climate change will need to be made very early in the Administration. Underlying these near term challenges is the necessity to restore US global leadership/respect and reset our badly overstretched and worn out military capability.
As the first post-9/11 transition, the new team will have an especially challenging task in assuming control over governmental institutions and policies with which it has not had personal experience.
These combination of factors means that the transition faces the daunting task of assuring a swift and sure command of the tools of power. A combination of boldness and prudence are critical. Perhaps more than any time in our history, the Administration must be ready to go on day one,
Although there are many unique features to this transition, this is not the first time in the modern era that a new President has come to office in time of war (Eisenhower and Nixon) nor one in which the country and the world looked for a new direction from the White House in our approach to the world (Kennedy and Carter). Thus history remains an important teacher in structuring the national security transition.
There are three core imperatives to the transition
The history of past transitions suggests several core lessons
With these considerations in mind, the following is a proposed game plan for the national security transition between now and inauguration day, broken into four periods
Phase One – Now until Convention
Phase Two – Convention until Election Day
Phase Three – Election Day until about Thanksgiving
Phase Three – Thanksgiving to Inauguration Day
RE: Hillary , Exposed - Ragnarök_62 - 06-15-2016 For everyone's convenience , here's the first of what will probably a lot of Wikileaks disclosures. https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=NSA&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult Servergate, what's not to love? Man, what shitty security, first pick an obvious target name like clintonemail.com and don't bother to lock the thing down. RE: Hillary , Exposed - Ragnarök_62 - 06-15-2016 Some random doners here: RE: Hillary , Exposed - Ragnarök_62 - 06-15-2016 (06-15-2016, 06:39 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: Now the Kremlin's Manchurian Candidate can better defend himself against scrutiny. Make no mistake this supposed "hacker" was a Russian government operation. This is war by non conventional means. 1. Don't know about "Manchurian candidate". It's more of a a. Bleached badger blowhard : no ones which way the wind blows. b. The arrogant hoist by her own petard lady : Has more baggage than a Samsonite factory. c. So we get pick yer poison, arsenic or cyanide. Rags go for option C: http://www.ontheissues.org/Jill_Stein.htm In the age of nukes, there's no glory in war. Just say not to Neocons. RE: Hillary , Exposed - Kinser79 - 06-26-2016 (06-15-2016, 06:39 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: Now the Kremlin's Manchurian Candidate can better defend himself against scrutiny. Make no mistake this supposed "hacker" was a Russian government operation. This is war by non conventional means. Funny you seem to keep saying that Daddy Trump is the Russian's Manchurian candidate. I assume you have evidence for that, or are you talking out of your ass like most of the other Never Trumpers? RE: Hillary , Exposed - Kinser79 - 06-26-2016 As for Shillary. Not surprising that she completely is terrible as to cyber security. If anything not being smart enough to know to hire smart security people should preclude her from being President. RE: Hillary , Exposed - Marypoza - 07-12-2016 (06-26-2016, 10:57 AM)Kinser79 Wrote: As for Shillary. Not surprising that she completely is terrible as to cyber security. If anything not being smart enough to know to hire smart security people should preclude her from being President. According to the FBI she wss "extremely careless" .. & she wants to run with the nuclear football. Throw in her penchant for wars........ uh no RE: Hillary , Exposed - Eric the Green - 07-15-2016 15 Facts From Comey FBI Director’s Testimony Backs Up Clinton, Debunks Republican Conspiracy Theories Today, House Republicans brought FBI Director James Comey in to testify – after the conclusion of a year-long investigation – in hopes of uncovering new details to damage Hillary Clinton. Instead, Comey’s testimony only debunked GOP talking points and further substantiated Clinton’s case. Here are 15 key takeaways: Emails reported as "marked classified" were improperly marked. MATT CARTWRIGHT: I don't think you were given a full chance to talk about those three documents with the little ‘C’s’ on them. Were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual? COMEY: No. And those emails could be reasonably judged as not classified. MATT CARTWRIGHT: If Secretary Clinton were an expert about what's classified and not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that? | COMEY: That would be a reasonable inference. There’s no evidence Clinton ever knew she had received classified information or intended to retain it on her server. COMEY: There is in my view not evidence beyond certainly probable cause, not evidence beyond a reasonable doubt she knew she was receiving classified information or she intended to retain it on her server. Guccifer admitted his claim he had hacked Clinton’s server was a lie. BLAKE FARENTHOLD: And [Guccifer] claimed he gained access to Sid Blumenthal's e-mail account and traced him back to Secretary Clinton's private server. Can you confirm that Guccifer never gained access to her server. | COMEY: He admitted that was a lie. And there is no evidence that Clinton’s server has ever been successfully hacked. COMEY: We were not able to conclude [any hacking attempts] were successful. The FBI’s investigation was not influenced by outside officials. COMEY: "They didn't influence it in any way." Clinton’s case is nothing like the case of General David Petraeus. COMEY: The Petraeus case to my mind illustrates perfectly the kind of cases the Department of Justice is willing to prosecute. Even there, they prosecuted him for a misdemeanor. In that case, you had vast quantities of highly classified information, including special sensitive compartmented information, that's the reference to code words. Vast quantity of it not only shared with someone without authority to have it but we found it in a search warrant hidden under the insulation in his attic and then he lied to us about it during the investigation. So you have obstruction of justice, you have intentional misconduct, and a vast quantity of information. He admitted he knew that was the wrong thing to do. That is a perfect illustration of the kind of cases that get prosecuted. In my mind, it illustrates importantly the distinction to this case. Clinton’s case is nothing like the case of CIA Director John Deutch. COMEY: The Deutch case illustrates [the difference between Clinton’s case and others who were prosecuted] perfectly. I mean he took huge amount of documents. Almost all at the TSSC I level. Had them in hard copy in his house, had them on an unclassified system connected to the internet, attempted to destroy some when he got caught. Admitted I knew I wasn't supposed to be doing this. You have clear intent, huge amounts of documents, obstruction of justice. Those are the kinds of cases that get prosecuted. That's what I said. I meant it when I said it. In my experience which is three decades no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case. I know that frustrates people but that's the way the law is and that's the way the practice is at the Department of Justice. 9. Clinton’s case is nothing like the case of Navy Commander Bryan Nishimura COMEY: Nishimura was prosecuted under the misdemeanor statute 1924 on facts that are very different. If you want me to go through them, I'll go through them but they are very different. The FBI’s conclusion that there was no case against Clinton was unanimous. WILL HURD: Was this unanimous opinion within the FBI on your decision? | COMEY: Well the whole F.B.I. wasn't involved but the team of agents, investigators, analysts, technologists — yes. Clinton’s email setup was, as she has always said, a matter of convenience. COMEY: Our best information is she set it up as a matter of convenience. It was an already existing system that her husband had and she decided to have a domain on that system. Clinton did not instruct lawyers who performed the sorting of her emails. JIM JORDAN: Did Secretary Clinton know her legal team deleted those emails they kept from us? | COMEY: I don't believe so. | JORDAN: Did Secretary Clinton approve those emails being deleted? | COMEY: I don't think there was any specific instruction or conversation between the Secretary and her lawyers about that. | JORDAN: Did you ask that question? | COMEY: Yes. | JORDAN: Did Secretary Clinton know her lawyers cleaned devices in such a way as to preclude forensic discovery? | COMEY: I don't think she did. | JORDAN: Did you ask that question? | COMEY: Yes. Hillary Clinton did not lie to the FBI. COMEY: We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI. Clinton was not even evasive with the FBI. COMEY: I don't think the [FBI] agents assessed she was evasive [in their 3.5 hour interview with Hillary Clinton.] There is no truth to the idea that others are prosecuted for what Clinton did. COMEY: There's all kinds of folks watching this at home who are being told, ‘well, lots of other cases were prosecuted and she wasn't.’ I want them to know, that's not true! RE: Hillary , Exposed - Marypoza - 07-19-2016 Yo Rags, I believe I found our candidate . http://dailyheadbanger.com/alice-cooper-wants-elected-president-prime-minister/ http://www.votealicecooper.com Eric can you cast Alice's chart plz? Thanx in advance RE: Hillary , Exposed - Eric the Green - 07-19-2016 (07-19-2016, 11:54 AM)Marypoza Wrote: Yo Rags, I believe I found our candidate . ha ha. nah, that's OK He'd be better than at least one major party nominee! and better-looking too! But his polling numbers will decline sharply when Summer's over, ha! RE: Hillary , Exposed - Marypoza - 07-19-2016 (07-19-2016, 12:15 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(07-19-2016, 11:54 AM)Marypoza Wrote: Yo Rags, I believe I found our candidate . ya think? RE: Hillary , Exposed - Eric the Green - 07-19-2016 "Hillary exposed." Do you suppose she looks good without her clothes? Maybe in her younger days? |