Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory
What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Printable Version

+- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Generations (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-20.html)
+---- Forum: The Millennial Generation (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-5.html)
+---- Thread: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? (/thread-306.html)

Pages: 1 2


What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - disasterzone - 07-19-2016

What I don't understand is why Millennials seem to excuse groups when they make insults towards people but they don't seem to tolerate people fighting back and insulting them back. Instead we're supposed to be mature in the face of immaturity and be the better person while the other people win. If you let people get away with acting insulting towards you, then you create more of that behavior. I don't see why they think it's not worth it to argue with them. I really don't get it. It teaches them a lesson whereas walking away doesn't. In Xers it seems like they expect you to get thicker skin and tolerate it. It's like they want everyone to just brush everything off. They too don't understand the importance of teaching people lessons of respect.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - MillsT_98 - 07-19-2016

(07-19-2016, 11:07 AM)disasterzone Wrote: What I don't understand is why Millennials seem to excuse groups when they make insults towards people but they don't seem to tolerate people fighting back and insulting them back. Instead we're supposed to be mature in the face of immaturity and be the better person while the other people win. If you let people get away with acting insulting towards you, then you create more of that behavior. I don't see why they think it's not worth it to argue with them. I really don't get it. It teaches them a lesson whereas walking away doesn't. In Xers it seems like they expect you to get thicker skin and tolerate it. It's like they want everyone to just brush everything off. They too don't understand the importance of teaching people lessons of respect.

That's what my parents seem to think. When they criticize me, I'm supposed to brush it off (or change myself), but when I fight back, it's considered "disrespectful". As a Millennial growing up with Xer parents, it's frustrating.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - disasterzone - 07-19-2016

(07-19-2016, 11:26 AM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-19-2016, 11:07 AM)disasterzone Wrote: What I don't understand is why Millennials seem to excuse groups when they make insults towards people but they don't seem to tolerate people fighting back and insulting them back. Instead we're supposed to be mature in the face of immaturity and be the better person while the other people win. If you let people get away with acting insulting towards you, then you create more of that behavior. I don't see why they think it's not worth it to argue with them. I really don't get it. It teaches them a lesson whereas walking away doesn't. In Xers it seems like they expect you to get thicker skin and tolerate it. It's like they want everyone to just brush everything off. They too don't understand the importance of teaching people lessons of respect.

That's what my parents seem to think. When they criticize me, I'm supposed to brush it off (or change myself), but when I fight back, it's considered "disrespectful". As a Millennial growing up with Xer parents, it's frustrating.

Yeah it's like a big proportion of Xers think toughening up is the solution to all fights like you don't have a right to be offended and show your offense. They think of it as entitled to complain about it.

I don't get the disrespectful bit. I mean if someone disrespects you, you have every right to be that way back. It doesn't make you just as bad as the other person because as far as I'm concerned, the other person started it. Being right means more to me than being mature. Ironically these attitudes encourage maltreatment because they know they can get away with it.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Skabungus - 07-19-2016

disasterzone Wrote:
MillsT_98 Wrote:
disasterzone Wrote:What I don't understand is why Millennials seem to excuse groups when they make insults towards people but they don't seem to tolerate people fighting back and insulting them back. Instead we're supposed to be mature in the face of immaturity and be the better person while the other people win. If you let people get away with acting insulting towards you, then you create more of that behavior. I don't see why they think it's not worth it to argue with them. I really don't get it. It teaches them a lesson whereas walking away doesn't. In Xers it seems like they expect you to get thicker skin and tolerate it. It's like they want everyone to just brush everything off. They too don't understand the importance of teaching people lessons of respect.

That's what my parents seem to think. When they criticize me, I'm supposed to brush it off (or change myself), but when I fight back, it's considered "disrespectful". As a Millennial growing up with Xer parents, it's frustrating.

Yeah it's like a big proportion of Xers think toughening up is the solution to all fights like you don't have a right to be offended and show your offense. They think of it as entitled to complain about it.

I don't get the disrespectful bit. I mean if someone disrespects you, you have every right to be that way back. It doesn't make you just as bad as the other person because as far as I'm concerned, the other person started it. Being right means more to me than being mature. Ironically these attitudes encourage maltreatment because they know they can get away with it.
1. Rise above.  "I mean if someone disrespects you, you have every right to be that way back. It doesn't make you just as bad as the other person because as far as I'm concerned, the other person started it."   Well, that is one way to handle it.  That is perhaps less than effective.  It is a tit for tat approach, an eye for an eye strategy that goes nowhere.  Instead of attacking in kind, rise above and understand that because someone attacks you, it doesn't mean they are right, or that they win, it just means they attacked you.  Nothing more.  If you are going to respond, certainly don't adopt the same tactic.  Rather, use your intellect to form a more sound argument, present it and be done with it, knowing all along that you are very unlikely to change their minds.

2. Being offended is so droll.  If you are worried about being offended you live on the wrong planet.  If someone offends you, speak your mind and then be done with them.  You don't have any special privilege that entitles you to go through life without being offended.  I see and hear offensive stuff all the time.  I get to choose how much attention I give it.  So do you. 

3. Sometimes you don't get the right of rebuttal.  When you pay the rent, you can bitch about the house and the chores.  When you pay for the car, you get to bitch about the gas, the maintenance of the car and the cost of the insurance.  Until then you owe respect to the person granting you the roof, the car keys and the gas money.  Sometimes you need to show a little respect.  It goes a long way.

4. I encounter new employees (Millies) that are simply shocked and even outraged that an upper level administrator can tell them to do/not do something and expect they will comply post haste.  Said new employees sometimes feel they have a right to rebuttal, a right to object loudly and (this one is really funny) simply refuse to do it.  Wrong.  Unless what you are being asked to do is a clear violation of law or policy or ethics, you better get your ass in gear with a "yessir" or "yes [insert title here]".  New employees often labor under the false assumption that, since they completed a degree, and actually got hired, that they know just as well as the next guy what the situation demands.  They are willing to dismiss the 20+ years of experience gained by their workmates and higher ups since, after all, they've been told how smart they are since they crawled outta da crib.  "Youthful arrogance" leads them to passionate, often loud and indignant, displays that do them no good, and often convince their older workmates to cease supporting/training/helping them. 

There you have it.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Odin - 07-20-2016

This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Skabungus - 07-20-2016

Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Odin - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote:
Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - MillsT_98 - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 03:43 PM)Odin Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote:
Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

It's probably pragmatism you're talking about. We're going to need that in the 4T.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - disasterzone - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 08:26 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 03:43 PM)Odin Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote:
Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

It's probably pragmatism you're talking about. We're going to need that in the 4T.

I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - MillsT_98 - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 09:12 PM)disasterzone Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 08:26 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 03:43 PM)Odin Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote:
Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

It's probably pragmatism you're talking about. We're going to need that in the 4T.

I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?

That probably sounds like X to me, not that I have much personal experience with what you just described, but that sounds like something Generation X would do.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - disasterzone - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 09:20 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 09:12 PM)disasterzone Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 08:26 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 03:43 PM)Odin Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote: No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

It's probably pragmatism you're talking about. We're going to need that in the 4T.

I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?

That probably sounds like X to me, not that I have much personal experience with what you just described, but that sounds like something Generation X would do.

I'm Millennial but I don't relate to this let's wait for official institutions to change thing. I mean sometimes you have to experiment and do what almost no one's doing because if you don't, by the time things change it will be too late for you and only the later generations will benefit or if you benefit, you benefit far less than the people who come after you. No thanks to that.... If you do something big slow and steady life circumstances might get in the way. It's better to do what you want all fast and all at the same time unless it's not feasibly possible or another bigger goal will stand in the way of that. Do whatever it takes to guarantee a plan works, almost anything because it can't afford to fail if you put everything in one basket.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Ragnarök_62 - 07-20-2016

Disasterzone Wrote:I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?

Easy.  That is exactly how my Silent father behaved on the job.
1. Brown nose the higher ups.
2. Befriend people he could use to get ahead.
3. Found pretty much every loophole.  Hey, he got a masters in mathematics.  Smart lab mice can also find their way through mazes...
4. If he didn't get his way, he complained very loudly, especially at home.  That's why I remember it so well.
5. Hmmm... "It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible..."  Definitely channeling my dad on that one.
6. Silents are very bad about this "keep up with the Jones thing" .

So you're a Homelander. Artists generations are silent on the outside but deadly on the inside.  Big Grin


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - MillsT_98 - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 10:16 PM)taramarie Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 09:51 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:
Disasterzone Wrote:I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?

Easy.  That is exactly how my Silent father behaved on the job.
1. Brown nose the higher ups.
2. Befriend people he could use to get ahead.
3. Found pretty much every loophole.  Hey, he got a masters in mathematics.  Smart lab mice can also find their way through mazes...
4. If he didn't get his way, he complained very loudly, especially at home.  That's why I remember it so well.
5. Hmmm... "It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible..."  Definitely channeling my dad on that one.
6. Silents are very bad about this "keep up with the Jones thing" .

So you're a Homelander. Artists generations are silent on the outside but deadly on the inside.  Big Grin

I actually instantly pictured silent when reading Disaster's description. Glad you picked up on it too.

How old are you Disaster? If you're an Artist than you must be younger than 12 or older than 73. I thought you were a last-wave Xer.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Ragnarök_62 - 07-20-2016

(07-20-2016, 11:25 PM)taramarie Wrote: I think Disaster is keeping it a secret. I thought he/she is a millie like us.

Ah , I think we have a winner here! Cool   The key to the unveiling of Mr. and I'm sure it's a "Mr." is on the horizon with a hue.

"The sky is blue". [Or a lack thereof ] wrt Mr. Disasterzone".   Big Grin

The handle has such a tone.

Methinks there's also something wrt two.

That's my take and a riddle for you.

So if it pans out as I think, please give Rags his due. Big Grin


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Skabungus - 07-21-2016

Odin Wrote:
Skabungus Wrote:
Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

Well, I don't really think it is a class thing.  I see millies doing it, and they are not all upper-middle class folk.  I think it is the shock that someone is willing to just say no to their demands that causes them to be enraged.

Incidentally "getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system" is in fact an end run.  It is rupturing the status quo just like the BDS  campaign against Israel: a millennial-powered attack, modeled after the BDS campaign Xers launched against South Africa.  In both cases you had Boomers hanging around providing ideological banners, but the strategic approach was an end run.  Millies following the Xer suit.  End run.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Kinser79 - 07-24-2016

(07-19-2016, 02:57 PM)Skabungus Wrote:
disasterzone Wrote:
MillsT_98 Wrote:
disasterzone Wrote:What I don't understand is why Millennials seem to excuse groups when they make insults towards people but they don't seem to tolerate people fighting back and insulting them back. Instead we're supposed to be mature in the face of immaturity and be the better person while the other people win. If you let people get away with acting insulting towards you, then you create more of that behavior. I don't see why they think it's not worth it to argue with them. I really don't get it. It teaches them a lesson whereas walking away doesn't. In Xers it seems like they expect you to get thicker skin and tolerate it. It's like they want everyone to just brush everything off. They too don't understand the importance of teaching people lessons of respect.

That's what my parents seem to think. When they criticize me, I'm supposed to brush it off (or change myself), but when I fight back, it's considered "disrespectful". As a Millennial growing up with Xer parents, it's frustrating.

Yeah it's like a big proportion of Xers think toughening up is the solution to all fights like you don't have a right to be offended and show your offense. They think of it as entitled to complain about it.

I don't get the disrespectful bit. I mean if someone disrespects you, you have every right to be that way back. It doesn't make you just as bad as the other person because as far as I'm concerned, the other person started it. Being right means more to me than being mature. Ironically these attitudes encourage maltreatment because they know they can get away with it.
1. Rise above.  "I mean if someone disrespects you, you have every right to be that way back. It doesn't make you just as bad as the other person because as far as I'm concerned, the other person started it."   Well, that is one way to handle it.  That is perhaps less than effective.  It is a tit for tat approach, an eye for an eye strategy that goes nowhere.  Instead of attacking in kind, rise above and understand that because someone attacks you, it doesn't mean they are right, or that they win, it just means they attacked you.  Nothing more.  If you are going to respond, certainly don't adopt the same tactic.  Rather, use your intellect to form a more sound argument, present it and be done with it, knowing all along that you are very unlikely to change their minds.

2. Being offended is so droll.  If you are worried about being offended you live on the wrong planet.  If someone offends you, speak your mind and then be done with them.  You don't have any special privilege that entitles you to go through life without being offended.  I see and hear offensive stuff all the time.  I get to choose how much attention I give it.  So do you. 

3. Sometimes you don't get the right of rebuttal.  When you pay the rent, you can bitch about the house and the chores.  When you pay for the car, you get to bitch about the gas, the maintenance of the car and the cost of the insurance.  Until then you owe respect to the person granting you the roof, the car keys and the gas money.  Sometimes you need to show a little respect.  It goes a long way.

4. I encounter new employees (Millies) that are simply shocked and even outraged that an upper level administrator can tell them to do/not do something and expect they will comply post haste.  Said new employees sometimes feel they have a right to rebuttal, a right to object loudly and (this one is really funny) simply refuse to do it.  Wrong.  Unless what you are being asked to do is a clear violation of law or policy or ethics, you better get your ass in gear with a "yessir" or "yes [insert title here]".  New employees often labor under the false assumption that, since they completed a degree, and actually got hired, that they know just as well as the next guy what the situation demands.  They are willing to dismiss the 20+ years of experience gained by their workmates and higher ups since, after all, they've been told how smart they are since they crawled outta da crib.  "Youthful arrogance" leads them to passionate, often loud and indignant, displays that do them no good, and often convince their older workmates to cease supporting/training/helping them. 

There you have it.

This pretty much sums up my views on this topic. Personally I don't get the whole perpetually offended thing, everything offends someone for some reason and almost always that reason is, to put it Xerishly--fucking retarded.

(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote:
Odin Wrote:This is a big thing that annoys me about many Xers, they seem to think letting one self be fucked over by the Powers That Be is a good thing.

No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

Skabungus, Odin here is one of those perpetually offended SJW types. In fact it is due to his nearly constant insults toward me for whatever his rage point de jour is that I've taken the forum title: Unreformed <insert ideology here>. It stems from a period of time when he consistently called me an unreformed Stalinist (it should be noted that I spent many years as your average African-American Marxist-Leninist so I know how the Left operates) though he is just as likely to call me a fascist these days since I've been spending my free time actively campaigning for Donald Trump instead of posting here.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Kinser79 - 07-24-2016

(07-20-2016, 09:20 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 09:12 PM)disasterzone Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 08:26 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 03:43 PM)Odin Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 11:42 AM)Skabungus Wrote: No.  That'd be a wrong interpretation.  Xers don't think that's a good thing, and they have most of their life trajectory to point to as an example of why the think it is a bad thing.  Instead, Xers have learned first hand, that jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended is a glorious waste of time.  Thus, Xers would advise to work smarter, not harder.  Find an end run around the system.  Millies (reflecting heavily on the Boomer culture they so worship) tend to feel entitled, offended and predisposed to temper tantrums in response to people puncturing their world view.

But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

It's probably pragmatism you're talking about. We're going to need that in the 4T.

I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?

That probably sounds like X to me, not that I have much personal experience with what you just described, but that sounds like something Generation X would do.

Gen X does not have any particular style of how to work the system.  Other than of course trying to work the system itself.  The fact is we do what works.  If brown nosing works we do that, if that doesn't work but raising a ruckus does we do that, if that doesn't work but more subtle tactics work we do that instead.

The key to understanding Nomad Generations and X in particular (as we are the nomad generation in a Mega-Unraveling saeculum) is that we are tribal, pragmatic and are results oriented.


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Odin - 07-24-2016

(07-24-2016, 09:03 AM)Kinser79 Wrote: I've been spending my free time actively campaigning for Donald Trump instead of posting here.

Then when the Trumpist version of the Night of The Long Knives happens, you, Milo, and all the other gay fascists are going to get purged just like Röhm was. Tongue


RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - beechnut79 - 07-25-2016

(07-24-2016, 09:08 AM)Kinser79 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 09:20 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 09:12 PM)disasterzone Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 08:26 PM)MillsT_98 Wrote:
(07-20-2016, 03:43 PM)Odin Wrote: But we're NOT just "jumping up and down throwing temper tantrums and ranting that you are deeply offended". Sure, that behavior is common among many college-age upper-middle class Millennials, but that is a class thing, not a generational thing.

I was always under the impression that the civic generations are more the team players and conformists, and it was the Boomers and their ilk that threw the tantrums and wanted to question each and every thing. I grew up at that time and still subscribe to some of that today. If we don't question, that won't nothing change for the better?
And "finding an end run around the system" is a stereotypically Nomad thing, Civics prefer getting together and organizing a hostile takeover of the system. The fact that Bernie Sanders got as many votes as he did is because of organized collective action by Millennials.

It's probably pragmatism you're talking about. We're going to need that in the 4T.

I first resort to trying to get favor from the higher ups through brown nosing. I don't try to change the system but try to get what I want within the system by befriending the right people and using system loopholes other people don't typically read about. If that doesn't work I complain very loudly. If the system seems absolutely hopeless to change for me, I find a workaround because it's pointless to wait for something that may never come. It's better to get things done fast and utilize as many resources and methods as possible. What generation does this sound?

That probably sounds like X to me, not that I have much personal experience with what you just described, but that sounds like something Generation X would do.

Gen X does not have any particular style of how to work the system.  Other than of course trying to work the system itself.  The fact is we do what works.  If brown nosing works we do that, if that doesn't work but raising a ruckus does we do that, if that doesn't work but more subtle tactics work we do that instead.

The key to understanding Nomad Generations and X in particular (as we are the nomad generation in a Mega-Unraveling saeculum) is that we are tribal, pragmatic and are results oriented.



RE: What do you think caused the notion that fighting back is immature in Millennials? - Galen - 07-26-2016

(07-24-2016, 12:02 PM)Odin Wrote:
(07-24-2016, 09:03 AM)Kinser79 Wrote: I've been spending my free time actively campaigning for Donald Trump instead of posting here.

Then when the Trumpist version of the Night of The Long Knives happens, you, Milo, and all the other gay fascists are going to get purged just like Röhm was. Tongue

Probably not, there is nothing in Trump's history to suggest anything of the sort.  There was plenty of evidence in the case of Adolf,  Mein Kampf and the Beer Hall Putsch come to mind.  Having listened to Milo and compared his speeches to several well known fascists it is pretty clear that he is not a fascist.