Generational Dynamics World View - Printable Version +- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum) +-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Theories Of History (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: Generational Dynamics World View (/thread-51.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
|
11-Sep-16 World View -- Syria's civilians fear worse violence from US-Russia 'ceasefi - John J. Xenakis - 09-10-2016 *** 11-Sep-16 World View -- Syria's civilians fear worse violence from US-Russia 'ceasefire' agreement This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Kyrgyzstan's World Nomad Games commemorate lifestyle of Genghis Khan **** One horseman knocking another off his horse at the World Nomad Games. (AFP) There were 40 countries, including Russia, China and the United States, competing in the World Nomad Games, held in eastern Kyrgyzstan during the last two weeks, between the Rio 2016 Olympics and the Paralympics. The games are a celebration of Central Asia's nomadic heritage, dating back centuries, including the era of Genghis Khan. During the opening ceremony, Kyrgyzstan's president Almazbek Atambayev said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"In the modern world, people are forgetting their > history, and there is a threat of extinction for traditional > cultures. Nomadic civilization is an example of sustainable > development, which is what all of humanity is looking for > today."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The star of the show was action film actor Steven Seagal, presumably publicizing his new movie "The Perfect Weapon." Seagal enjoys a cult-like following in the countries of the former Soviet Union, and the audience went wild when Seagal appeared on horseback, dressed as a khan (ancient Kyrgyz warrior) in armor and rode in on a horse as the Games’ guest of honor. The sports include mass-wrestling, eagle hunting. The highlight is the traditional Central Asian sport buzkashi also known as kok-boru, "a violent Central Asian form of polo in which two teams battle for control of a decapitated goat carcass." Kok Boru is described as a violent and exciting game, akin to polo -- except instead of a ball the players attempt to score by picking up, carrying, and tossing a goat carcass, the head and hooves removed, into a circle at the opposite end of the field. The goat is traditionally slaughtered right before the game and delivered to the village elder after. Foreign Policy and The Diplomat and Guardian (London) and EurasiaNet **** **** Syria's civilians fear worse violence from US-Russia 'ceasefire' agreement **** Bombs rained down from warplanes on Saturday on a civilian marketplace in Idlib, near Aleppo in Syria, killing 37 people, including many women and children. At least 82 people were killed on Saturday in bombings from warplanes of the regime of Syria's president Bashar al-Assad. Syria's civilians fear worse violence from the announced "ceasefire," since the regime is using the opportunity to gain as much ground as possible before the ceasefire is scheduled to begin on Monday. Generally speaking, in any war, a "ceasefire" is bound to be a farce for several reasons:
In this case, one of the politicians is US Secretary of State John Kerry. During his tenure, he's stumbled from one foreign policy disaster to the next, probably still hoping to get a Nobel Peace Prize if he keeps on trying. The other politician is Russia's Defense Minister Sergei Lavrov who seems capable of lying about anything and everything, and never makes a true statement except by accident. Not directly involved in the deal is Syria's president Bashar al-Assad, who has contempt for pretty much everybody, and certainly sees this agreement as an opportunity to gain a military advantage. It's been well-publicized for weeks that al-Assad sees the current battle in Aleppo as an opportunity to strike a fatal blow against the opposition. According to one analyst: > [indent]<QUOTE>"If the regime is unable to retake Aleppo, that will > demonstrate that they are unable to retake all of Syria. If the > opposition suffers defeat and is routed from the city, it’s a sign > the revolution has lost."<END QUOTE>[/indent] This analysis alone means that the ceasefire will not last. The ceasefire would mean that the status quo is maintained and the regime will have failed to retake Aleppo. With al-Assad's army in trouble, possibly close to collapse, he may believe that the battle of Aleppo is an existential crisis for his regime. Furthermore, Russia is now the main hegemonic power in the Mideast, and Russia has made it clear that they want al-Assad in power, so they will continue to use maximum military violence, irrespective of any "ceasefire." So if al-Assad has agreed to the ceasefire, as news reports indicate he has, then he will use it to gain every possible military advantage, in preparation for what he undoubtedly sees as the ultimate critical battle of Aleppo. BBC and Russia Today and CS Monitor and SANA (Syria) Related Articles
**** **** Generational theory: Bashar al-Assad's miscalculation **** As I've said before, from the point of view of Generational Dynamics, al-Assad is wrong to believe that the recapture of Aleppo would mean that the revolution is ended. Al-Assad is thinking of his father's war, which ended when Hafez al-Assad massively slaughtered tens of thousands of Sunnis in the town of Hama, Syria, in 1982, turning the town to rubble. But that was a generational crisis war, and so ended with an "explosive crisis," something I've described a number of times. This war is a generational Awakening era war, and the rules are very different. The biggest difference is that there are plenty of people in the Sunni opposition today who recall the 1982 massacre, are prepared for it, and will not let it stop them from protesting and fighting, even if Aleppo is lost. Awakening era wars follow a pattern that I've described many times in countries like Burundi, Thailand, Zimbabwe, South Sudan, and others. The Awakening era is the time when the first post-war generation comes of age, creating a "generation gap," as happened in the United States in the 1960s. It's characterized by large student protests and demonstrations, but any armed conflict fizzles quickly. That's what would have happened in 2011 if Bashar al-Assad hadn't treated peaceful protests by young people as an excuse to start exterminating all Sunnis. Today's students' parents were defeated by Hafez al-Assad in 1982, and these students are well aware of that, so they will not let the loss of one city stop them in 2016. Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Kyrgyzstan, World Nomad Games, Russia, China, Genghis Khan, Almazbek Atambayev, Steven Seagal, kok-boru, Syria, Idlib, Aleppo, Bashar al-Assad, John Kerry, Sergei Lavrov, Hafez al-Assad, Hama, Burundi, Thailand, Zimbabwe, South Sudan Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 12-Sep-16 World View -- South Korea announces 'Massive Punishment and Retaliation' - John J. Xenakis - 09-11-2016 *** 12-Sep-16 World View -- South Korea announces 'Massive Punishment and Retaliation' and decapitation for N. Korea This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** After North Korea's 5th nuclear test on Friday, a 6th may be imminent **** North Korea's child dictator Kim Jong-un expresses pleasure at the nuclear tests on Friday (KCNA/AFP) North Korea on Friday set off its most powerful nuclear bomb to date. Earlier in the week, North Korea test-launched three ballistic missiles, and country officials are claiming that North Korea is almost ready to launch nuclear missiles. The nuclear test was condemned by political leaders around the world. China, North Korea's supposed ally, also protested North Korea's "disregard" for international stability. It's believed that China's fear is of a destabilized North Korean government, although China would take advantage of that situation by moving its military quickly to take control of the North. On Sunday, unnamed South Korean government sources said that another nuclear test may be imminent: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Indications have been gathered that the North has > completed preparations to conduct a nuclear test at any time in > the third tunnel that has not been used previously."<END QUOTE>[/indent] After Friday's test, the US threatened to launch additional sanctions against North Korea unilaterally, without seeking permission from the UN Security Council. However, North Korea mocked the threat in its state-run media: > [indent]<QUOTE>"The group of Obama's running around and talking about > meaningless sanctions until today is highly laughable, when their > 'strategic patience' policy is completely worn out and they are > close to packing up to move out. > > As we've made clear, measures to strengthen the national nuclear > power in quality and quantity will continue to protect our dignity > and right to live from augmented threats of nuclear war from the > United States."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Years of international sanctions targeting North Korea have had no effect. Yonhap (Seoul, 9-Sept) and National Post (9-Sep) and Reuters and Straits Times **** **** South Korea announces 'Massive Punishment and Retaliation' and decapitation for N. Korea **** South Korea has announced the "Korea Massive Punishment and Retaliation" (KMPR) plan to annihilate Pyongyang, the capital city of North Korea, through intensive bombing. The KMPR would be triggered in case the North shows any signs of a nuclear attack. According to a government official: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Every Pyongyang district, particularly where the > North Korean leadership is possibly hidden, will be completely > destroyed by ballistic missiles and high-explosive shells as soon > as the North shows any signs of using a nuclear weapon. In other > words, the North’s capital city will be reduced to ashes and > removed from the map."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The attack would be conducted with conventional weapons, as South Korea has no nuclear weapons, although some Seoul officials have been calling for a nuclear development program in the South. Of note is that the KMPR threat is of a pre-emptive attack. That is, the South would not wait for a nuclear attack. Instead, the KMPR attack would be launched "if signs of the impending use of nuclear weapons are detected or in the event of a war." In the KMPR scenario, South Korea will deploy its Hyunmoo 2A and Hyunmoo 2B ballistic missiles, with a range of between 300 and 500 kilometers as well as the Hyunmoo-3 cruise missiles with a range of 1000 kilometers. "The KMPR is the ultimate operation concept the military can have in the absence of its own nuclear weapons," according to a government official. The threat is also highly personal in that the North Korean child dictator Kim Jong-un will be specifically targeted with "decapitation strikes" on the North Korean leadership. Yonhap News (Seoul) and Korea Times and Japan Times KEYS: Generational Dynamics, North Korea, Kim Jong-un, South Korea, Korea Massive Punishment and Retaliation, KMPR Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 13-Sep-16 World View -- As Syria ceasefire begins, Bashar al-Assad quickly rejects it - John J. Xenakis - 09-12-2016 *** 13-Sep-16 World View -- As Syria ceasefire begins, Bashar al-Assad quickly rejects it This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** As Syria ceasefire begins, Bashar al-Assad quickly rejects it **** Map of Syria and Iraq, showing who's in control of different regions (WaPost) The latest and greatest ceasefire in Syria's war began at 7 pm local time on Monday, amid reports that the regime of Syria's president Bashar al-Assad is continuing to drop barrel bombs on civilian neighborhoods in Aleppo. It's never been entirely clear whether or not al-Assad was accepting the ceasefire proposal that was imposed by Russia and the United States, but on Monday, he made a statement that clearly rejected it: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We as a nation ... are delivering a message that the > Syrian state is determined to recover all regions from the > terrorists and restore security, infrastructure, and everything > else that was destroyed in both human and material aspects. > > We come today here to replace the fake freedom they tried to > market at the beginning of the crisis ... with real freedom, not > the freedom that begins with them and is sustained by dollars > ... and by some promises of positions."<END QUOTE>[/indent] If you look at the map above, you can see that the al-Assad regime and the opposition rebels (the "Sunni insurgents") are together fighting over a western region that's only a small fraction of Syria, and that al-Assad is not in control of the overwhelming portion of Syria. The region colored green, which is controlled by Kurdish forces, is much larger, if you count the portions under Kurdish control in both Syria and Iraq. The so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) also controls large sections of Syria and Iraq, and those are totally out of reach of the al-Assad regime. So the ceasefire agreement, if implemented, might leave al-Assad still in power, but only in control of a small fraction of the country. And al-Assad is clearly not willing to accept that. The second portion of al-Assad's statement promises to replace "fake freedom they tried to market at the beginning of the crisis ... with real freedom." There's some confusion about what this statement means, and I've actually seen different translations in different reports, but here's my interpretation of what it means. When the crisis began early in 2011, there was no ISIS, no al-Nusra, and no Free Syrian Army. There were just peaceful protests, demanding what al-Assad is now calling "fake freedom." There are peaceful protests in Washington, London, Paris, and other cities. Suppose there were a "Black Lives Matter" protest on the Washington Mall, and President Obama responded by calling out the army and air force to shoot and bomb the protesters, as well as the cities in which the protesters live. It's a bizarre concept, but that's what al-Assad did in 2011, and this brings me to a contradiction that's been bothering me for years. Suppose there were some peace agreement, and everyone stopped fighting. What would happen if Syrian civilians began peaceful protests again? -- which is what would happen in a generational Awakening era. I'm guessing that the psychopathic Bashar al-Assad would start shooting and bombing civilians again. So this week we have a ceasefire deal reached in Geneva by the United States and Russia. But there are no penalties for violations, in particular, no violations for continuing air strikes and barrel bombs launched by the al-Assad regime. And neither al-Assad nor any of the opposition groups have endorsed the deal anyway. Indeed, the US State Department on Monday had to go out of its way to deny that the US and Russia would have any control whatsoever on Syrian regime airstrikes. As usual in the media, there always has to be "good news" and "hope." Today's version is that most of the fighting seems to have stopped at least for the time being. We'll have to see how long it lasts. Washington Post and ARA News (Syria) and VOA Related Articles
**** **** Confusion grows over role of al-Nusra Front in US-Russia peace plan **** When jihadists from around the world began pouring into Syria in 2013 to fight Bashar al-Assad, many of them joined al-Qaeda linked Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Nusra Front). However, as the trickle of jihadists turned into a flood, there was a split between al-Nusra and a new jihadist group, the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh). There were two major differences between the two jihadists group. The first difference was that ISIS refused to pledge allegiance to al-Qaeda, while al-Nusra continued its allegiance to al-Qaeda. The second difference was that al-Nusra has always been an organization of almost exclusively Syrian fighters, while ISIS has fighters from all over the world. However, members of the Free Syrian Army and other "moderate" rebel groups did not want to be associated with any jihadist group, either al-Nusra or ISIS. In July, al-Nusra announced that it would split with al-Qaeda, and rename itself Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (JFS - Front for the Conquest of Syria). The announced objective was to become more acceptable to the moderate rebel groups in Syria, and also to become more acceptable to the international community. The United States announced that JFS was still considered to be a terrorist organization. The US airstrikes have continued to target JFS, and last week the US announced that an airstrike had killed Abu Hajer al Homsi (alias Abu Omar Saraqeb), a top JFS commander. However, JFS's split with al-Qaeda has made any discussion of a peace agreement more complicated. An objective of the US-Russia ceasefire deal is that FSA and "moderate" rebel groups should be spared, while jihadists should continue to be targeted. But now JFS and FSA are working more closely together in fighting al-Assad. Insofar as they've merged, the distinction between moderate and jihadist fighters has gotten even more complicated, and makes it even less likely that any ceasefire will last for long. Reuters (9-Sept) and The National (UAE) and Al-Monitor Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Syria, Bashar al-Assad, Aleppo, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Nusra Front, Free Syrian Army, FSA, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, JFS, Front for the Conquest of Syria, Abu Hajer al Homsi, Abu Omar Saraqeb Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe RE: 13-Sep-16 World View -- As Syria ceasefire begins, Bashar al-Assad quickly rejects it - pbrower2a - 09-13-2016 (09-13-2016, 10:10 AM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: In spite of Komrade Drumpf's bloviating (BTW, how would that sort of traitorous talk have gone down during WW2?), the Iraqi government and Kurdish Iraqi government have retaken most of the territory from the earlier ISIS incursion. Iraq is nearly back to normal, control wise. Of course neither the Obama-derangement syndrome crowd nor the MSM have highlighted this fact. It does not sell their evil wares. The useful idiot Donald Trump may have compromised the peace process. The Iraqi government and Iraqi Kurds have done well in recapturing much of Iraq from Daesh, probably because they are not hostile to each other. That the Iraqi government can try and execute perpetrators of a massacre (that the perpetrators killed Iraqi soldiers after changing sides to Daesh makes those killers traitors as well) indicates the confidence of the Iraqi government. That's not to say that the Kurds won't have their little bloodletting in the aftermath, probably for religious persecutions resulting in death. 14-Sep-16 World View -- Monday's EU summit to show that Europe 'not detached from rea - John J. Xenakis - 09-13-2016 *** 14-Sep-16 World View -- Monday's EU summit to show that Europe 'not detached from reality' over migrants This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Monday's EU summit to show that Europe 'not detached from reality' over migrants **** Refugees at Hungary's border with Serbia, 16-Sept-2015 (AFP) European Council president Donald Tusk said that European leaders need to show that they're "not detached from reality" at the EU summit to be held in Slovakia's capital city Bratislava on Monday. He was referring to the issues of immigration and free movement of people within Europe, in view of the importance of these issues in the success of the Brexit referendum in Britain, calling for Britain to leave the European Union, and a recent regional election in Germany that handed Angela Merkel a stinging defeat. According to Tusk: > [indent]<QUOTE>"The Bratislava summit is not about Brexit per se. It > is about bringing back political control of our common > future. People are turning against what they perceive as an > irrational openness. They see the world around them getting more > chaotic. Uncontrolled migration, terrorism, injustices linked to > globalization - we have to confront such issues with real > political leadership. ... What must be delivered is a sense of > security and order. > > We in Europe cannot build a political community only on the > concept of mandatory and total openness for everyone. The union > also has to be about protection – protection of our freedoms, our > security, our quality and way of life. ... There is a balance to > be restored. I think the union is one the best tools we have to do > it."<END QUOTE>[/indent] According to a leaked document authored by Tusk, "People are concerned by a perceived lack of control and fears related to migration, terrorism, and globalization." Some of the issues that he identified to be discussed at Monday's summit include:
Politico (EU) and Telegraph (London) and Irish Times Related Articles
**** **** Luxembourg Foreign Minister calls for Hungary's expulsion from EU over migrant issue **** Luxembourg's Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn has called for Hungary to be suspended or even expelled from the European Union because of its "massive violation" of EU fundamental values: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Those who, like Hungary, build fences against > refugees from war or who violate press freedom and judicial > independence should be excluded temporarily, or if necessary > forever, from the EU. ... [This is] the only way to preserve the > cohesion and values of the EU. > > "The fence that the Hungarians built to deter refugees is getting > longer, higher and more dangerous. Hungary is not far away from > issuing orders to open fire on refugees. Anyone who wants to > overcome the fence must expect the worst. ... > > Moreover, all this is happening in a country from where hundreds > of thousands fled to Europe from the Soviets in > 1956."<END QUOTE>[/indent] However Asselborn's boss, Luxemburg prime minister Xavier Bettel, disagreed: > [indent]<QUOTE>"I think we should view ourselves as like a family in > which all members share the same value together and speak to one > another when a family member does not accept these common values. > We should not exclude a family member."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Foreign ministers from Austria and Germany also immediately rejected Asselborn's call. Hungary’s Foreign Minister, Péter Szijjártó, responded acerbically: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We’ve known even before that Jean Asselborn is not a > serious character. It really shows that he only lives a few > kilometers away from Brussels. He wants to exclude Hungary from > the EU, but he has already long excluded himself from the circle > of politicians who can be taken seriously. Being the good nihilist > that he is, he is working tirelessly on destroying European > security and culture."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Luxemburger Wort and Budapest Business Journal and Hungarian Free Press Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, European Union, Donald Tusk, Luxembourg, Jean Asselborn, Xavier Bettel, Hungary, Péter Szijjártó Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 15-Sep-16 World View -- UK politicians debate the 2011 Libya intervention - John J. Xenakis - 09-14-2016 *** 15-Sep-16 World View -- UK politicians debate the 2011 Libya intervention This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** UK politicians debate the 2011 Libya intervention **** UK Parliament buildings A report produced the UK Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee strongly condemns the 2011 intervention in Libya, mostly by the UK and France, with US support. > [indent]<QUOTE>"The consequence was political and economic collapse, > inter-militia and inter-tribal (warfare), humanitarian and migrant > crises, widespread human rights violations and the growth of [the > so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh)] in North > Africa."<END QUOTE>[/indent] This report was written by politicians to criticize other politicians, and on that basis alone there's no reason to believe that the report is anything but a collection of politically charged accusations based carefully selected "facts" from people who have no clue what's going on the world. As I wrote in March, there was a bloodbath going on in Libya in early 2011, with a massive refugee crisis with hundreds of thousands of refugees pouring into neighboring countries. Muammar Gaddafi declared war on the protesters, and the Arab League requested a no-fly zone over Libya. The ironically named "Arab Spring" began in early 2011, and resulted in chaos in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. No politicians could have either caused or prevented this chaos, or could even have predicted that it would happen. It was caused by the rise of a new generation of young Arabs throughout the Mideast. Nonetheless, this report complains that David Cameron should have predicted that militant extremist groups would attempt to benefit from the rebellion, that a proper predictive analysis should have been made, that the country was poorly understood, and that there was no effective advance strategy to support and shape post-Gaddafi Libya. In fact, from the point of view of Generational Dynamics, Chaos Theory tells us that none of those things could be accurately predicted or formulated. In fact, all of the countries mentioned above were chaotic in different ways, and nobody that I'm aware of correctly predicted what would happen in any of them. BBC and Guardian (London) and UK Parliament Related Articles
**** **** Libya and Syria illustrate the intervention dilemma for policy makers **** There is an obvious comparison to be made between the Libya intervention and the Syria non-intervention. Both situations were chaotic, both occurred as a result of the "Arab Spring," but the West intervened in Libya, but not in Syria. Let's take the paragraph quoted above on the outcome of the Libya intervention, and rephrase to describe the outcome of the Syria non-intervention: > [indent]<QUOTE>"The consequence was political and economic collapse > (worse in Syria than in Libya), inter-militia and inter-tribal > (warfare - in both countries), humanitarian and migrant crises > (much worse in Syria, with millions of refugees flooding into > neighboring countries and Europe), widespread human rights > violations (Bashar al-Assad's massive genocidal attacks on Sunnis) > and al-Assad's creation of ISIS, which spread to Iraq, Libya and > other countries."<END QUOTE>[/indent] My opinion is that the policy of non-intervention in Syria has been a major geopolitical disaster, while the intervention in Libya has mitigated a disaster already in progress. At the very least, this comparison illustrates the complexity for policy makers about when the intervene. Related Articles KEYS: Generational Dynamics, UK Parliament, France, Libya, Muammar Gaddafi, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 16-Sep-16 World View -- Syria blocks humanitarian aid to Aleppo - John J. Xenakis - 09-15-2016 *** 16-Sep-16 World View -- Syria blocks humanitarian aid to Aleppo This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Syria blocks humanitarian aid to Aleppo **** Aleppo on Wednesday (CNN) The "good news" today about the Syria ceasefire, based on reports by correspondents on the scene interviewed on the BBC and RFI, is that while there's no real ceasefire, the amount of violence has decreased, and also that the regime of Syria's president Bashar al-Assad has temporarily stopped bombing hospitals and schools. The "bad news" is that nobody believes that the ceasefire will last for long, and everybody on all sides expects it to collapse any day. The ceasefire deal was reached between the US and Russia. None of the belligerents in the war on any side has endorsed the deal. The epicenter of the ceasefire's failure is Castello Road, the highway into east Aleppo, where the people, including many women and children, have been starving because of a siege by al-Assad's military forces. A critical part of the ceasefire deal is that the UN has to be able to deliver humanitarian aid to the people of east Aleppo. The UN has 40 trucks full of food, medicine and other humanitarian aid ready to go. But after four days, the trucks are stuck on the Turkey-Syria border, unable to move because Castello Road is too dangerous to travel, and because Syria has not given permission. UN officials have been scathingly critical of Syria for not permitting the humanitarian aid to be delivered. According to Jan Egeland, chairman of the Syrian humanitarian task force: > [indent]<QUOTE>We could go today. We're not. . . . The permits have > not been given. We hope to go tomorrow, to eastern Aleppo. > > Not a single permit is in the hands of our people."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Since 2011, there have been other attempts at humanitarian deliveries, some of which have been approved by the Syrian regime. However, the deliveries have all been held up Syrian troops roadblocks. At these roadblocks, the Syrian troops would pick through the humanitarian aid and remove much of it, leaving little for the intended recipients. In this case, the United Nations is insisting that Syrian troops will not be permitted to harass the truck convoys and confiscate the food. United Nations Special Envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura said the Russia has agreed to allow humanitarian aid, but the Syrian regime is blocking it: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Those facilitation letters, final permission for the > U.N. to actually reach those areas (needing aid), have not been > received. That's a fact. It is particularly regrettable because > normally during these days we are losing time. These are days > which we should have used for convoys to move with the permit to > go because there is no fighting. > > The Russian federation is agreeing with us about this, so are the > two co-chairs (U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian > Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov). This is something that requires > to take place immediately."<END QUOTE>[/indent] My guess is that the only reason that al-Assad approved this humanitarian delivery plan in the first place is because his army is desperate and confiscating the UN aid would help the army. Four days ago I gave a list of reasons why it would fail, and all of those reasons are coming true. Al-Assad himself quickly rejected the ceasefire, saying, "We as a nation ... are delivering a message that the Syrian state is determined to recover all regions from the terrorists and restore security, infrastructure, and everything else that was destroyed in both human and material aspects." Both al-Assad and his opposition see the battle of Aleppo as the turning point of the war. Al-Assad's siege of Aleppo is starving the people, and it's been well-publicized that he believes that if he can force the opposition in Aleppo to surrender, then it will be a fatal blow for the entire war. If he's unable to force the opposition in Aleppo to surrender, it will be a sign that he's lost the war. So I was surprised that al-Assad agreed to the Aleppo humanitarian delivery at all, since it strikes at the heart of his principal objective, and would end the siege. However, the new development that al-Assad is blocking the humanitarian deliveries, or that if approved they will be confiscated by his army, makes perfect sense. The only thing that can change this dynamic is for Russia to find a way to force al-Assad to comply. That seems unlikely, but we'll have to wait and see. CNN and Washington Post and Reuters Related Articles
**** **** Report: Turkey will build 'residential cities' in Syria buffer zone **** It's now been almost a month since Turkey began the invasion of northern Syria known as 'Operation Euphrates Shield' . Turkey achieved a quick victory by driving the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) to leave Syria's border city of Jarablus. Since then, Turkey has been rebuilding Jarablus, providing water and electricity for the hundreds of Syrian refugees returning to the region. Electricity will be provided by a three-kilometer underground power line from the Turkish city of Karkamis, and water will be supplied by using power generators to divert water from the city's wells into the water network. In one day earlier this week, around 1,700 Syrian refugees in Turkey have returned to Jarablus and the surrounding area. Ever since millions of Syrian refugees started pouring into Turkey, Turkey has been lobbying to build a "buffer zone" in northern Syria, to provide a place where Syrian refugees can go rather than cross the border into Turkey. However, the international community has opposed the idea, fearing that it would create additional conflict. On Tuesday, Turkey's Deputy Prime Minister Nurettin Canikli announced that Turkey has started implementing a plan for a buffer zone in northern Syria, and would start building "new residential cities" in Syrian areas recently liberated from ISIS by “Operation Euphrates Shield.” Turkey is currently hosting 2.7 million Syrian refugees, and the objective is to place them in fully equipped residential areas that Turkey was planning to build. Turkish officials hope to get approval from the United Nations Security Council to create the buffer zone, but it seems possible that Turkey will go ahead with its plans with or without Security Council approval. Daily Sabah (8-Sep) and Asharq Al-Awsat (London) Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Syria, Aleppo, Bashar al-Assad, Castello Road, Jan Egeland, Staffan de Mistura, Russia, Operation Euphrates Shield, Turkey, Jarablus, Karkamis, Nurettin Canikli, residential cities, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 17-Sep-16 World View -- Concerns grow about Tunisia's stability as economic protests - John J. Xenakis - 09-16-2016 *** 17-Sep-16 World View -- Concerns grow about Tunisia's stability as economic protests escalate This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Tunisia remains the #1 source of foreign fighters for ISIS **** Sources of foreign fighters joining ISIS (Soufan Group, 2015) On December 17, 2010, street vendor Mohamed Bouazizi doused himself in gasoline and set himself on fire in a town in central Tunisia, after police allegedly confiscated his fruit and vegetable stand because he lacked a permit. Bouazizi later died. His act of self-immolation set off the "Jasmine Revolution" in Tunisia, as well as the "Arab Spring" in Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq and Syria. The Jasmine Revolution ousted Tunisia's long-time president Zine el Abidine Ben Ali, but Tunisia's experience is considered the "gold standard" for the Arab Spring because the transition of power was peaceful, and Tunisia is still a secular democracy, as contrasted to the violence in other Arab countries. It's the peaceful nature of its transition that some people are now blaming for Tunisia's severe problems with jihadi terrorists. In March of last year, two terrorist gunmen infiltrated security at the well-known Bardo Museum in Tunis, right next door to the parliament building. They took and killed 22 hostages, with 50 people injured. Almost all of the casualties were foreign tourists. Tunisians were still in shock from that attack, when another attack occurred in June. A gunman disguised as a tourist opened fire at a Tunisian hotel in Sousse on Friday, killing 37 people. Perhaps the most significant fact about Tunisia is that it's the number one source of foreign fighters who have gone to Syria to join the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh). Some 5,500 Tunisian citizens are now fighting in Syria and in Libya, far more than any other country. According to a CNN study, around 8,800 young Tunisians have been stopped at the border. Some people are claiming that the reason is the huge disappointment in that things have not changed since the Jasmine Revolution. One foreign language teacher in Tunisia is quoted as explaining: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Among one single family, six children have gone to > Syria. Yet, they come from a middle-class family. So how do you > explain this? The reason is that they grew up in a country without > moral values. During the former regime, a family man could be > humiliated in front of his kids by the lowest employee of an > administration, without being able to defend himself. The father > figure has been shattered. They all grew up without a sense of > respect for the law because of corruption."<END QUOTE>[/indent] And yet, police brutality continues, especially against young people, and the economy is suffering. The reasons for radicalization are various, however, they are all rooted in deep feelings of injustice and disappointment due to the unkept promises that were made after the 2011 uprising: access to economic and social rights, more jobs for the youth, and reforms in the security ministry. Last year's terrorist attacks were successful in that tourism to Tunisia has plummeted, with the economy losing as much as $2 billion. With so many young people unemployed, ISIS has found it fruitful to target Tunisian youth for radicalization, and once again, ISIS has apparently been very successful. Washington Times and Middle East Eye and Reuters Related Articles
**** **** Tunisia's town of Ben Guerdane on Libya border exemplifies problems **** In March of this year, ISIS militants from Libya crossed the border into Tunisia, and attempted to establish a permanent outpost in the Tunisian city of Ben Guerdane. Tunisia's military forces crushed the effort, but Things got worse in March, when the Islamic State suddenly attempted to seize the Tunisian city of Ben Guerdane, near the border with Libya. Tunisian security forces crushed the attack, but 45 militants and 13 Tunisian security personnel were killed. To prevent further ISIS infiltration, Tunisia's security forces have allegedly been torturing and killing anyone who seems suspicious. Security forces have killed more than 60 people near the border, including many children. Because Ben Guerdane is on the border with Libya, it's a major smuggling gateway between the two countries. However, corruption is high according to a Ben Guerdane resident: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Lives here don’t seem to matter. The army and > national guards fight over who controls the roads [used by > smugglers]. > > Smugglers who refuse to pay bribes are shot. When Daesh attacked, > the smugglers begged the security forces to give them arms [to > fight Daesh], while security personnel were asking for [smuggled] > cigarettes."<END QUOTE>[/indent] On September 3, a young man suspected of smuggling was shot and killed by a military patrol unit. This triggered a protest march followed by violent demonstrations on September 5. Further unrest is expected. Tunisia Live and Anadolu **** **** Escalating economic protests across Tunisia threaten country's stability **** Protest activity in cities across Tunisia (AEI) The violent demonstrations in Ben Guerdane on September 5 were followed by violent demonstrations in Fernana, a town in northwestern Tunisia, starting on September 7 and continuing for several day. Protests are spreading to other cities in Tunisia in a manner resembling the original Jasmine Revolution. It's feared that the demonstration are going to worsen. Thanks to the two terrorism attacks last year, tourism revenues have been slashed. With a surging national budget deficit, it's going to be necessary to implement an austerity program, including sharp cuts in public spending, possibly laying off many public sector workers. Tunisia's prime minister Youssef Chahed announced on Friday that his ministers' salaries will be cut by 30%. Each of his 40 ministers and junior ministers, who earn around $1,800 a month, will have their salaries cut by about $500 per month. However, this move is unlikely to quell the surging discontent, or to slow down the attempts by ISIS to recruit Tunisian youth. It's feared that the growing number of protests in cities across Tunisia is going to destabilize the country, possibly as much as the other Arab Spring countries were destabilized. AEI Critical Threats and Reuters **** **** France's new ambassador to Tunisia commits huge gaffe **** France's new ambassador to Tunisia, Olivier Poivre d’Arvor, generated controversy with a major gaffe in a radio interview on August 30, shortly after starting his official duties on September 10. During the interview he said that his main concern in his new job was for the security of the 30,000 French citizens living in Tunisia, as he believed they were targets for the terrorists of Tunisia. He added that Tunisia was a major supplier of terrorists. One person in social media is quoted as saying: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Mr. Ambassador thank you for your feelings towards my > country Tunisia, but about the security of French nationals in > Tunisia, it is ensured by the Tunisian authorities. Your main > mission is to convey to your government the expectations of a > country that had thought to count on its first partner for a > successful democratic transition."<END QUOTE>[/indent] In attempting to recover from the gaffe, the French embassy said that the ambassador "notably mentioned support for the consolidation of democracy in Tunisia, economic partnership and development, cultural cooperation or education assistance. It is the breadth and diversity of the French-Tunisian cooperation that make the relation exceptional, according to the term used by Olivier Poivre d'Arvor himself, which makes France the leading partner of Tunisia." Tunisia Live and TAP (Tunisia) KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Tunisia, Mohamed Bouazizi, Jasmine Revolution, Zine el Abidine Ben Ali, Arab Spring, Bardo Museum, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, Ben Guerdane, Libya, Fernana, Youssef Chahed, France, Olivier Poivre d’Arvor Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 18-Sep-16 World View -- India and Pakistan in vitriolic accusations at the UN - John J. Xenakis - 09-17-2016 *** 18-Sep-16 World View -- India and Pakistan in vitriolic accusations at the UN over Kashmir and Balochistan This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Violence in India-controlled Kashmir grows as thousands defy curfew **** Muslims in India-controlled Kashmir shout pro-freedom slogans at funeral of 11-year-old boy on Saturday (EPA) Weeks of violent clashes in India-controlled Kashmir continued on Saturday, when thousands of angry demonstrators defied a curfew to attend the funeral of Nasir Shafi Qazi, an 11-year-old schoolboy, whose body was found riddled with bullets and pellet marks. Violent clashes in Muslim-majority Kashmir began on July 9, following the death on July 8 of Burhan Wani, a 22-year-old commander in the separatist militia Hizbul Mujahideen (HM). There have been 81 deaths and thousands of injuries. Hundreds of people have been blinded for life, having been shot by the security forces with "non-lethal" pellet guns that are often turning out to be lethal. The Hindu vs Muslim unrest in Kashmir continues to grow, and is "organic," meaning that it's coming up from the people, rather than being controlled by country leaders or army generals. What we're seeing is a repeat of the last two generational crisis wars, which were also "organic" and extremely bloody: India's 1857 Rebellion and the 1947 Partition war. The current Hindu vs Muslim unrest continues to spiral in that direction, and I see nothing that is likely to stop it. The Hindu and AFP and Al Jazeera Related Articles
**** **** India and Pakistan in vitriolic accusations at the UN over Kashmir and Balochistan **** Map of Pakistan, highlighting Kashmir and Balochistan Appearing before the United Nations Human Rights Council, India and Pakistan are embarking on vitriolic tit-for-tat accusations. The Pakistan delegate said "India’s attempts to deny its illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir [is] a travesty of history." Pakistan said that give the "persistent, irresponsible flouting of international norms governing inter-state behavior by India, we are constrained to point out the abysmal human rights record of the Indian government." As the Pakistan delegate was attacking India's record in India-controlled Kashmir, the Indian delegate responded by attacking Pakistan's record in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir as being "administered by a 'deep state'", and also in Pakistan's province of Balochistan: > [indent]<QUOTE>"In the last two decades, the most wanted terrorists > of the world have found succor and sustenance in Pakistan. This > tradition unfortunately continues even today, not surprising when > its government employs terrorism as an instrument of state > policy. ... > > In fact, Pakistan is a nation that practices terrorism on its own > people. The sufferings of the people of Balochistan are a telling > testimony in this regard. Not coincidentally, this region also > serves as a base to conduct terrorism and violate human rights in > a neighboring country."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The Baloch people are Shia Muslims of Iranian descent, and have been the targets of numerous bloody terrorist attacks by terror groups linked to the Pakistan Taliban and to al-Qaeda. Apparently, mentioning Balochistan at the UN Human Rights Council has violated some kind of unwritten agreement between India and Pakistan, where they politely ignore many of each other's human rights violations. So the Pakistan delegate struck back by saying: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Over one third of Indian territory is under a full > blown peasant insurgency. There is a despicable human rights > situation in Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura and Assam, and ethnic > groups in India's north-east have been battling for rights since > many decades in the face of terrible repression."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The epicenter of the vitriolic disagreement between Pakistan and India continues to be Kashmir, and it's clear that the situation gets worse every week. As I wrote above, The current unrest between India's Hindus and Pakistan's Muslims continues to spiral towards war, and I see nothing that is likely to stop it. Indian Express and First Post and Daily Times (Pakistan) and Telegraph (Calcutta) Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, India, Pakistan, Kashmir, Balochistan, Burhan Wani, Nasir Shafi Qazi, Hizbul Mujahideen, HM, India 1857 Rebellion, 1947 Partition war, Baloch, Iran, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Assam Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 19-Sep-16 World View -- New terrorist attack in Kashmir threatens India-Pakistan - John J. Xenakis - 09-18-2016 *** 19-Sep-16 World View -- New terrorist attack in Kashmir threatens India-Pakistan retaliation This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** New terrorist attack in Kashmir threatens India-Pakistan retaliation **** An Indian policeman fires a teargas shell at Srinagar, Kashmir, protestors on Tuesday (Reuters) Sunday's American newscasts were occupied with unending discussions of Trump and Clinton vitriolicly calling each other names, as well as the terrorist attacks in New York City, wounding 28 people, all of whom have been released from hospital. But if you're worried about the possibility of global war, then the much more important story on Sunday, totally ignored by the newscasts, was India and Pakistan vitriolicly calling each other names, and the new terrorist attacks in Kashmir, killing over 17 people. In the hours following the first posting of my article yesterday on Kashmir and Balochistan, four militants, carrying guns and grenades, stormed an Indian army base in Uri in Kashmir. There was a five-hour firefight, and at least 17 soldiers were killed, as were the militants. This was the worst militant terrorist attack in Kashmir in years. India's Home Affairs Minister Rajnath Singh reacted by blaming Pakistan and calling Pakistan a "terrorist state," and said that "there are definite and conclusive indications that the perpetrators of Uri attack were highly trained, heavily armed and specially equipped. I am deeply disappointed with Pakistan's continued and direct support to terrorism and terrorist groups." Pakistani officials responded: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Pointing fingers at Pakistan has become a traditional > tendency of India after each terrorist attack. In the past many > Indians were involved in the terrorist acts for which India had > blamed Pakistan. ... > > India is trying to divert world's attention from the human rights > violations being committed in occupied Kashmir. ... > > The whole world is looking at the Indian atrocities in India-held > Kashmir and UN Human Rights Commissioner has also offered to send > fact finding mission to Kashmir which India has > rejected."<END QUOTE>[/indent] India's media is calling for retaliation against Pakistan. India's Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar tweeted: > [indent]<QUOTE>"The supreme sacrifice of 17 brave soldiers will not > go in vain. My salute to them. Reviewed situation in Kashmir > following Uri attack with Army Chief & Commanders. Instructed to > take firm action against those responsible."<END QUOTE>[/indent] According to G. Parthasarathy, former High Commissioner of India to Pakistan: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Pakistan is isolated within SAARC [South Asian > Association for Regional Cooperation], as three members of the > regional group have accused it of sponsoring > terrorism. Afghanistan, Bangladesh and India have accused > Islamabad of sponsoring terrorism that ISI continues to generate, > irrespective of the condition of the bilateral ties with > India. Such attacks take place irrespective of the ties being > temporarily good or continuously bad. A response therefore has to > be forcefully enunciated."<END QUOTE>[/indent] India and Pakistan were at the brink of war following the November 2008 three-day '26/11' terror attack in Mumbai. That attack was perpetrated by Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), a Pakistan Taliban terrorist group. India threatened to invade Pakistani soil to go after Lashkar-e-Toiba. War was only avoided by hard intervention from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. It appears that India and Pakistan are, once again, on the brink of war. As I've been writing repeatedly in the last few weeks, the situation in Kashmir is "organic," meaning that the rebellion is coming up from the people, rather than being controlled by country leaders or army generals. What we're seeing is a repeat of the last two generational crisis wars, which were also "organic" and extremely bloody: India's 1857 Rebellion and the 1947 Partition war. It seems increasingly likely that this will explode into full-scale anti-Indian rebellion by the Kashmir Muslims in the next few months. If that happens, then a war between India and Pakistan becomes increasingly likely, and that would bring in their allies -- Russia and the U.S. on India's side, and China and Saudi Arabia on Pakistan's side. As long-time readers know, this is what has been predicted for ten years, based on Generational Dynamics analyses, as the world gets closer and closer to the Clash of Civilizations world war. BBC and The Hindu and Dawn (Pakistan) and Reuters Related Articles
**** **** Russia accuses US of intentionally striking Syria's army to support ISIS **** On Saturday, airstrikes from the US-led coalition were supposed to target a tank position of the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) in Deir Ezzor, but mistakenly targeted Syrian regime troops who were fighting ISIS in that region. Russia's military says that 62 Syrian regime soldiers were killed. US Central Command said that they had conferred with the Russian military before the airstrike but, as usual, only broadly described the geographic area. Russia convened an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Russia's ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, accused the US of intentionally striking the Syrian army in order to support the ISIS terrorists: > [indent]<QUOTE>"It is quite significant and frankly suspicious that > the United States chose to conduct this particular airstrike at > this time. Why all of a sudden did the United States choose to > help the Syrian armed forces defending Deir Ezzor. After all they > did nothing when ISIL was advancing on Palmyra. ISIL made a 100 > mile march without being attacked by the coalition. All of a > sudden the United States decides to come to the assistance of the > Syrian armed forces defending Deir Ezzor. > > It is quite significant and I would suggest not accidental that > this happened just two days before the arrangements - Russian > American arrangements - were supposed to come into > force."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the UN, responded by calling the whole meeting hypocritical stunt: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Even by Russia's standards, tonight's stunt -- a > stunt replete with moralism and grandstanding -- is uniquely > cynical and hypocritical. ... > > Russia really needs to stop the cheap point scoring and the > grandstanding and the stunts and focus on what matters -- which is > implementation of something that we negotiated in good faith with > them, which has shown it can reduce violence, and shown it can > save lives, but it needs to be implemented. And a meeting like > this, a stunt like this, isn't helping anybody."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Power continued by listing atrocities of the Syrian regime. Australia's Department of Defense said in a statement that Australian aircraft were involved in the attacks in Deir Ezzor, targeting "what was believed to be a Daesh fighting position that the Coalition had been tracking for some time." It said bombing "ceased immediately" once Russian officials notified the coalition's Combined Air Operations Center that the targets may have been regime forces. CNN and Russia Today and The Australian Related Articles KEYS: Generational Dynamics, India, Pakistan, Kashmir, Uri, Rajnath Singh, Manohar Parrikar, G. Parthasarathy, Mumbai, Lashkar-e-Toiba, LeT, Condoleezza Rice, Syria, Deir Ezzor, Russia, Vitaly Churkin, Palmyra, Samantha Power, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 20-Sep-16 World View -- Germany's Angela Merkel expresses regret after election loss - John J. Xenakis - 09-19-2016 *** 20-Sep-16 World View -- Germany's Angela Merkel expresses regret after election loss in Berlin This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Germany's Angela Merkel expresses regret after election loss in Berlin **** Food at the AfD election party in Berlin (DPA) Germany's center-right Christian Democrat Union (CDU), led by Chancellor Angela Merkel, suffered a historic defeat in a regional election in Berlin on Sunday, falling off 6% since the last election, getting only 17.6% of the vote, behind the Social Democratic Party (SDP) at 21.6%. Most significant were the gains by the right-wing anti-immigrant Alternative für Deutschland (AfD - Alternative for Germany) party, considered xenophobic by many, at 14.2%. Berlin's SPD Mayor Michael Müller had dramatically warned before the election that a strong AfD result would be "seen throughout the world as a sign of the resurgence of the right and of Nazis in Germany." Merkel's loss is attributed to a voter reaction against her famous phrase "Wir schaffen es" (we can do it), referring to a policy of allow hundreds of thousands of refugees to enter Germany in 2015. Merkel expressed regret over the election loss, and to a poll indicating that 82% of Germans are unhappy with the refugee policy: > [indent]<QUOTE>"If I could I would play back time so I and the German > federal government and leaders could have been better prepared," > she said. > > "We have not done everything right in the last few years. We are > not world champions in integration. ... > > If those 82% means that people do not accept foreigners, > particularly people with Islamic background, this is against our > constitutional rights, against our Christian democratic... and > personal convictions. I and the CDU cannot represent this > course."<END QUOTE>[/indent] However, it's not completely clear that the loss was entirely due to migrant issues. The election was also dominated by local issues, including poor public services, crumbling school buildings, late trains and a housing shortage. Some reports indicate that Merkel's refugee policy will continue in any event. While the Social Democrats won the largest share of the vote, 21.6%, they will have to enter a coalition with two other left wing parties, Die Linke (15.6%) and the Greens (15.2%) to govern. A left-wing coalition, if formed, would probably continue to be favorable to refugees. AFP and CNN and McClatchy Related Articles **** **** Summit in Bratislava shows an EU in disarray **** There was a European Union Summit meeting over the weekend in Bratislava, the capital city of Slovakia, but only 27 of the 28 EU members were represented. The representative from the UK was not invited because on June 23, the UK passed the Brexit referendum, calling for the UK to leave the EU. So even though the UK is still a full-fledged member of the European Union, the new UK prime minister Theresa May was not invited. Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel has won repeated elections in Germany, the strongest economy in Europe, and so Merkel has been setting much of the agenda for Europe for almost ten years. Although there is no one in Europe with the charisma necessary to replace Merkel as a leader, Merkel has certainly been weakened by the migrant crisis and her election defeats. Between that and Britain's Brexit vote, which called for Britain to leave the European Union, Europe itself is in disarray. Indeed, the Brexit scenario is itself in disarray. Britain's new prime minister Theresa May has said that they won't even invoke "Article 50" until next year. Invoking Article 50 begins the two-year negotiation process for Britain's exit from the EU, and so no negotiations have begun to take place, leaving many businesses and people unable to make plans. There are two major issues to be resolved by the Brexit negotiations. One issue is whether Britain will remain as part of the European Common Market, which is considered necessary by some people for Britain's trade requirements. The other issue is whether Britain will allow the free flow of people between Britain and the EU nations. Many Britons would like to remain in the Common Market even if there is no free flow of people, but many European leaders have already rejected that option, saying that you can't have freedom of trade unless you also have freedom to travel. Even without the UK present, the EU summit was considered failure. Many people had hoped that the Summit would find a way to resolve the disputes, and particularly to reach a compromise with Hungary's prime minister Viktor Orbán which would allow Hungary to accept some migrants. None of this was accomplished. Italy's prime minister Matteo Renzi said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"I don't know what Merkel is referring to when she > talks about the 'spirit of Bratislava'. If things go on like > this, instead of the spirit of Bratislava we'll be talking about > the ghost of Europe."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Reuters and Gulf News Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Germany, Angela Merkel, Christian Democrat Union, CDU, Social Democratic Party, SDP, Alternative für Deutschland, AfD, Berlin, Michael Müller, Bratislava, Slovakia, Britain, Theresa May, Hungary, Viktor Orbán, Italy, Matteo Renzi Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 21-Sep-16 World View -- US increasingly expresses total disgust with Syria regime - John J. Xenakis - 09-20-2016 *** 21-Sep-16 World View -- US increasingly expresses total disgust with Syria regime for Bashar al-Assad's atrocities This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Warplanes target and bomb humanitarian aid convoy near Aleppo in Syria **** Humanitarian aid truck struck by Bashar al-Assad regime's warplanes on Monday (CNN) Warplanes on Monday targeted a clearly identified United Nations and Red Crescent aid convoy bringing food, medicines and other humanitarian aid intended for eastern Aleppo in Syria, where an estimated 250,000 civilians have been short of food, medicine and water. At least 18 of 31 trucks in a U.N. and Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC) convoy were hit, along with a SARC warehouse. Omar Barakat, the director of the Red Crescent's Urum al-Kubra branch near Aleppo, was killed, along with 12 aid workers and dozens of civilians. U.N. aid chief Stephen O'Brien said "Notification of the convoy ... had been provided to all parties to the conflict and the convoy was clearly marked as humanitarian." The aid convoy was almost certainly struck by warplanes of the regime of Syria's president Bashar al-Assad, although officially investigators are saying that the warplanes could have been either Russian or Syrian. Russian officials immediately claimed that the strikes were perpetrated by "terrorists," but the only Syrian "terrorist" with warplanes is Bashar al-Assad. This is reminiscent of the time when Russians in eastern Ukraine shot down Malaysian Airlines flight 17 airliner with a Russian Buk missile in 2014, and then bragged about it on Twitter, after which the Russian trolls moved into action to claim that Nato had shot airliner down to embarrass Russia. Reuters and CNN and Syria Direct (Lebanon) Related Articles
**** **** Led by the US, more people are openly expressing total disgust with Bashar al-Assad **** As I frequently point out, almost every day something new happens that a few years ago you would have to have been crazy to believe would ever happen. This past week, the most bizarre occurrence was that the US and Russia decided to cooperate on a ceasefire -- after two previous failures -- which had zero chance of working because Bashar al-Assad said that he intended to continue. The Bashar al-Assad has used Sarin gas on its own population, with impunity. The regime has continued to use chemical weapons. Regime helicopters drop huge barrel bombs onto civilian neighborhoods. The barrel bombs may contain explosives, screws, nails and other shrapnel, plus canisters of chlorine and ammonia. When chlorine is inhaled, it reacts with the moisture in the lungs, turning into hydrochloric acid that literally burns the target to death from the inside out. Al-Assad has conducted "industrial strength" torture on tens of thousands of ordinary civilians over the past decade. This man, Bashar al-Assad, is almost beyond belief in his depraved psychopathy. But whenever I refer to him as a "genocidal monster," some of his trolls comment that he's a great, wonderful man, even if he has a fault or two. Nothing surprises me any more, but I do wonder about these trolls selling their souls every day to glorify an evil monster just to get paid a few dollars a day. Western officials have always remained "cautious" about criticizing al-Assad, because they hoped that if they were nice to him then he would stop having his warplanes kill sleeping children in their dormitories. But anyone who has been nice to al-Assad has never been anything but a useful idiot, providing cover to al-Assad for more atrocities. But now, after regime warplanes struck the aid convoy on Monday, officials seem more willing to criticize al-Assad. Actually, it's a lot more than that. After years of pent-up anger from being "nice" to al-Assad, there have now been bursts of fury. US State Department spokesman John Kirby said to the BBC (my transcription): > [indent]<QUOTE>"For so many years now, for five years, it's been the > regime who has really, really perpetrated the worst brutality on > their own people. It's been the regime dropping barrel bombs and > chlorine on their own people. It's been the regime that's been > besieging towns like Aleppo, starving people, refusing to let > medicine get in. The regime has been by far the worst violator of > the cessation of hostilities."<END QUOTE>[/indent] France's president François Hollande said: > [indent]<QUOTE>Syria is now a shame, a stain for the international > community. To accept that there is a city ... where the > population is starving, with humanitarian convoys attacked, with > chemical weapons used and with children who become victims every > day — it’s the responsibility of the entire world."<END QUOTE>[/indent] However, the gold medal for letting loose absolutely fury goes to outgoing United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who said the following to the UN General Assembly on Tuesday: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Powerful patrons that keep feeding the war also have > blood on their hands. Present in this hall today are > representatives of governments that have ignored, facilitated, > funded, participated, or even planned and carried out atrocities, > inflicted by all sides of the Syria conflict against Syrian > civilians. Just when we think it can't get any worse the bar of > depravity sinks lower. Many groups have killed many innocents -- > but none more so than the government of Syria, which continues to > barrel bomb neighborhoods and systematically torture thousands of > detainees."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Why is anyone even surprised that the al-Assad blew up the aid convoy? Al-Assad has repeatedly made clear that he wanted to siege, starve and kill all the civilians in Aleppo, since he's under the delusion that this will end all anti-government protests, just like his father Hafez who perpetrated similar atrocities in 1982. Bashar al-Assad has repeated made it clear that he wants to kill all the "terrorists" -- by which he means all the Sunni Muslim civilians, whom he considers to be cockroaches to be exterminated. When the bizarre ceasefire plan was first announced, al-Assad said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We as a nation ... are delivering a message that the > Syrian state is determined to recover all regions from the > terrorists and restore security, infrastructure, and everything > else that was destroyed in both human and material > aspects."<END QUOTE>[/indent] In other words, al-Assad, who has become delusional, has made it clear that he will attain total victor, and won't stop committing atrocities until then. That was obvious from day one. So what the hell was this moronic "ceasefire" supposed to be about? AP and NBC News Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Syria, Aleppo, Bashar al-Assad, Urum al-Kubra, Syrian Arab Red Crescent, SARC, Omar Barakat, Stephen O'Brien, Ukraine, Malaysian Airlines flight 17, John Kirby, France, François Hollande, Ban Ki-moon Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 22-Sep-16 World View -- Pakistan-India tensions again surge as Pakistan demands indep - John J. Xenakis - 09-21-2016 *** 22-Sep-16 World View -- Pakistan-India tensions again surge as Pakistan demands independence for Kashmir This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Pakistan-India tensions again surge as Pakistan demands independence for Kashmir **** Indian security personnel in Kashmir after violent protests in 2015 (PTI) The increasingly vitriolic war of words between India and Pakistan probably wouldn't make much difference to anyone, since it could simply ignored as mutual political bashing, which is so common these days in countries around the world, in this generational Crisis era. However, the increasing vitriol is occurring in the context of increasing "organic" violence in Indian-controlled Kashmir, where the stone-throwing crowds continue to grow and India continues to respond with pellet guns that have wounded, blinded or killed hundreds of Kashmiri Muslims since the violence began on July 9, following the death on July 8 of Burhan Wani, a 22-year-old commander in the separatist militia Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), at the hands of India's security forces. Speaking at the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, Pakistan's prime minister Nawaz Sharif glorified Burhan Wani, condemned India's violence, and demanded independence for Indian-controlled Kashmir. > [indent]<QUOTE>"[Burhan Wani] represents a new generation of > Kashmiris are fighting for freedom against India. > > This indigenous uprising of the Kashmiris has been met, as usual, > with brutal repression by India’s occupation force of over half a > million soldiers. Over a hundred Kashmiris have been killed, > hundreds, including children and infants, blinded by shotgun > pellets and over six thousand unarmed civilians injured over the > past two months. > > On behalf of the Kashmiri people; on behalf of the mothers, wives, > sisters, and fathers of the innocent Kashmiri children, women and > men who have been killed, blinded and injured; on behalf of the > Pakistani nation, I demand an independent inquiry into the > extra-judicial killings, and a UN fact finding mission to > investigate brutalities perpetrated by the Indian occupying > forces, so that those guilty of these atrocities are punished. > > Pakistan fully supports Kashmiris' right to > self-determination."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Sharif also referred to an arms buildup in India, and said, "The international community ignores the dangers of rising tensions in South Asia at its own peril," By "self-determination," Sharif is referring to a 1951 UN Security Council resolution mandating an election to permit Kashmiri self-determination. Neither side is obeying this resolution, as neither side is willing to give up the portions of Kashmir and Jammu provinces that it controls. According to polls, even Kashmiri Muslims want an independent state, and do not wish to be part of either India or Pakistan. However, neither Pakistan nor India would ever agree to this. An Indian official responded, "It is shocking that a leader of a free nation can glorify a self-declared terrorist (Burhan Wani). This is self-incrimination by Pakistan." India has accused Pakistan of being behind the violence and unrest in Kashmir, and also of being a "terrorist state" behind Sunday's militant attack on an Indian army base in Kashmir, the worst terrorist attack in Kashmir in decades. It's certainly possible that Pakistan's government backing violence and terrorist attacks in Kashmir, but it's not necessary. As I've been describing, the violence is "organic," meaning that it comes from the people rather than from the politicians. India and Pakistan are returning to the massive violence of their last two generational crisis wars, India's 1857 Rebellion and the 1947 Partition war. The News (Pakistan) and Reuters and Daily Mail (London) Related Articles
**** **** Pakistan ejects Indian journalist from New York press conference **** Following the speech by Pakistan's prime minister Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry held a press conference at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York. According to reports, Chaudhry demanded that no Indians be permitted to attend the press conference, and ordered the ejection of New Delhi TV's reporter Namrata Brar. According to the reports, the order was given "Iss Indian ko nikalo," which means "Remove this Indian." Ejecting an Indian reporter from a Pakistani press conference is just one more sign of the growing xenophobic hatred between Hindus and Muslims in the region, but apparently the Pakistani action is triggering hilarity and mocking the phrase 'Iss Indian Ko Nikalo' in social media. One tweet said: "Pakistani Official Said 'Iss Indian Ko Nikalo' to NDTV Journalist. UNESCO Has Declared It As Sarcasm Of The Year." Another tweeter made fun of the fact that the speaker even uttered the word "Indian": "I strongly object this statement of Pakistan, specially the word ‘Indian’ is totally not acceptable for ndtv." Another made fun of the fact that not all NDTV journalists are Indian: "Iss Indian Ko Nikalo was clearly a case of mistaken identity. Where was the Indian?" New Delhi TV and Indian Express KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Pakistan, India, Nawaz Sharif, Kashmir, Burhan Wani, India's 1857 Rebellion, 1947 Partition war, Iss Indian ko nikalo, Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, Namrata Brar, New Delhi TV, NDTV Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 23-Sep-16 World View -- US and Turkey headed for collision in Syria - John J. Xenakis - 09-22-2016 *** 23-Sep-16 World View -- US and Turkey headed for collision in Syria This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Turkey's Erdogan blames the EU for reneging on the refugee deal **** Refugees in a refugee center south of Mosul, February 14, 2016 (Reuters) In his speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, Turkey's president Recep Tayyip Erdogan blamed the European Union for not fulfilling its commitments in the EU-Turkey refugee deal: > [indent]<QUOTE>"As a response to this, the promises made by the EU to > Turkey were unfortunately not been kept. ... > > Turkey was left alone since the beginning of Syrian conflict and > once again I think we are facing the same consequence. ... > > As Turkey, with a humanitarian-centered approach, we have kept our > borders wide open to those fleeing tyranny and oppression. ... > > In a world, where babies are murdered, no one can remain innocent. > We should immediately, promptly and resolutely take action to stop > this crisis, otherwise we won't have the opportunity to explain to > the future generations why we were delayed in our > actions."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Erdogan's point is that Turkey is hosting three million refugees from Syria and Iraq, but European Union promises of aid have not been kept, leaving Turkey to solve this overwhelming problem on its own, despite the help that Turkey has given to Europe in dramatically slowing the flow of refugees across the Aegean Sea to Europe. Anadolu (Ankara) and Al Monitor **** **** With Turkey 'left alone,' Erdogan announces refugee plan conflicting with US plans **** In his UN speech, Turkey's president Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkey has been "left alone," and he made it clear that Turkey is now going to solve its overwhelming refugee problem in its own way, but that way could put it into direct conflict with US plans in Syria. Turkey's invasion of Syria, called "Operation Euphrates Shield," has created a "safe zone" of about 900 square kilometers (560 square miles). In his speech, Erdogan announced plans to increase the size of the "safe zone" to 5,000 square kilometers (3,100 square miles), and he stated three goals:
The expanded safe zone would be controlled by Turkey, and would achieve another major objective not mentioned: preventing the Kurds from controlling a long strip of land along Turkey's border, stretching almost all the way from the Mediterranean in the west to Iraq in the east. The safe zone would push the Kurds south and east, keeping them far from Turkey's border. Erdogan's objectives would appear to be well coordinated with the US, but drilling down into the details reveals big conflicts. The city of Raqqa in Syria is the de facto capital of the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh). The US military is preparing a campaign to be launched in October to recapture Raqqa from ISIS. The US plans to directly arm the Syrian Kurds to fight ISIS in Raqqa. However, Turkey considers the Syrian Kurdish militias to be terrorist groups, linked to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). The PKK has conducted several large terrorist attacks in Turkey in the last year, they are considered a terror group by the US and the EU. So Turkey wants nothing to do with the Kurdish militias in Syria, and strongly opposes the US plan to arm them. ARA News (Syria-Kurdish) and Daily Sabah (Ankara) and Reuters Related Stories
**** **** A major new flood of refugees starting to flee from Mosul in Iraq **** A major new humanitarian disaster appears to be imminent in Iraq, as over a million refugees may flee Mosul as Iraqi forces begin an extremely bloody battle to evict ISIS from Mosul. Many of the refugees are expected to flee to Kurdistan, the Kurdish-controlled area of Iraq. Kurdistan currently hosts more than 1.8 million refugees, and another half-million or more refugees pouring into Kurdistan would completely overwhelm its ability to feed and provide shelter. The UK has already promised to give $52 million to Iraq, ahead of the Mosul offensive, to prepare for the influx, but Kurdish officials say that billions more in aid are needed. Fox News and ARA News and Al Arabiya Related Stories
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Syria, Kurdistan Workers’ Party, PKK, Operation Euphrates Shield, safe zone, no-fly zone, Bashar al-Assad, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, Iraq, Mosul, Kurdistan Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 24-Sep-16 World View -- Syria's al-Assad goes for the kill - John J. Xenakis - 09-23-2016 *** 24-Sep-16 World View -- Syria's al-Assad goes for the kill, turning Aleppo and civilians to bloody rubble This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Syria's al-Assad goes for the kill, turning Aleppo and civilians to bloody rubble **** Aftermath of bombing in Aleppo on Friday (AP) US Secretary of State John Kerry has once again been the major instigator and Russia's useful idiot for what has turned out to be a new foreign policy farce for the Obama administration. As I wrote when the ceasefire agreement was first announced, just a few days ago, ceasefire agreements in the middle of a war are almost always worthless, and this one was particularly farcical because Syria's president Bashar al-Assad has repeatedly made clear that's he's going to massacre all the "terrorists," by which he means all Sunni Muslim civilians, including women and children. A real ceasefire would give new life to the residents of Aleppo, and al-Assad wants them dead, not alive. So there was literally a zero probability that the ceasefire would last. The particular event that signaled the failure of this ceasefire was the missile attack, by either Syrian or Russian warplanes, on a truck convoy that was delivering food, water, medicines, and other humanitarian aid to east Aleppo. Right off, we can see what a farce this is. Al-Assad doesn't want a humanitarian aid cargo to reach east Aleppo. There are hundreds of thousands of civilians there, and al-Assad wants them all dead. So of course he was going to make sure that the aid convoy didn't reach them. This is not rocket science. The warplanes destroyed 18 of 31 trucks in the convoy. Immediately we had to listen to the moronic statements of Bashar al-Assad and Russia's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, claiming that nothing had happened, or that the "terrorists" had bombed the trucks, or that an American drone had struck the convoy with missiles. At an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, Secretary of State John Kerry mocked and made fun of Syrian and Russian excuses: > [indent]<QUOTE>"According to spokesman Igor Konashenkov, I quote, > "Neither Russia nor Syria conducted air strikes on the UN > humanitarian convey in the suburb on the outskirts of Aleppo." > That's a quote. > > Then Komashenkov went further, and he said "The damage to the > convoy was a direct result of the cargo catching fire." The > trucks and foods and the medicine just spontaneously combusted. > Anybody here believe that? I mean this is not a joke. We're in > serious business here."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Kerry waved his arms in the air to emphasize the idiocy of the suggestion that 18 of 31 trucks were destroyed by spontaneous combustion. But this is the level of discourse that's filling the halls of the United Nations, rapidly turning into the most useless organization in the world. And we have to ask what the hell Kerry thinks he's doing. Kerry must have known that the ceasefire would quickly fail, as it did. Kerry must have known that the Syrians and Russians would use the ceasefire as an opportunity to reorganize and rearm in preparation for the end of the ceasefire. Kerry must have known the Syrians and the Russians were making a complete fool out of him. The most likely explanation is that Kerry still hopes that the loons in Sweden will give him the Nobel Peace Prize when they announce it October 7. They gave it to Obama in 2009 "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." So why not? If Kerry stumbles and lurches from one failed policy to the next, all in the name of "peace," then why shouldn't the Swedish loon give it to Kerry for exactly the same reason: "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples" -- even though all such efforts have been absurd failures. On Friday, Syrian and Russian warplanes appeared to be closing in for the killed. Hundreds of missiles and barrel bombs rained down on eastern Aleppo, turning many neighborhoods to rubble mixed with blood and body parts. Washington Post and CNN Related Articles
**** **** Responses to reader comments **** > [indent]<QUOTE>"The Syrian government is working with the terrorist > group Hezbollah, a sworn enemy of Israel."<END QUOTE>[/indent] This is a very good point that isn't mentioned enough. Hezbollah, Bashar al-Assad, and Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei are all committed to the destruction of Israel. > [indent]<QUOTE>"Give it up Breitbart, We the people don't want a war > with Syria. Let Saudi Arabia and Israel fight they're own wars > for the pipeline. The lives of are sons and daughters should not > be sacrificed for globalist!"<END QUOTE>[/indent] One of the bitter ironies of the way the world works is that war is rarely a choice. The United States has mutual defense treaties with many countries: Japan, South Korea, Israel, Taiwan, the Philippines, the Marshall Islands, the ANZUS agreement with Australia and New Zealand, a special treaty with Iceland, and the NATO agreement with all of Europe. Even more important, there are a lot of people, in America and in the world, who believe in American Exceptionalism, and who truly believe that America has a moral obligation, or even an obligation dictated by God, to do the right thing, so we won't stay out of a war very long. > [indent]<QUOTE>"Of all the players in the Syrian conflict, Erdogan is > the most culpable. Assad being an Alawite, and therefore an > infidel in Sunni eyes, the Gulf Arabs put up the funding and > Erdogan the logistical support for an armed uprising against him. > Turkey provided free passage for ISIS volunteers, training, and > medical support. Turkey bought ISIS oil and passed on Gulf money. > But Erdogan has a problem. He hates the Kurds even more than he > hates Assad. And Russia supports Assad. So he is putting off the > removal of Assad for now, the better to deal with his own Kurds, > and those in Syria and Iraq."<END QUOTE>[/indent] This simply doesn't make any sense. Recall that early in 2011, Turkey and Syria were allies. The historic enmity between Alawites and Sunnis was put aside, and Turkey's prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan considered Bashar al-Assad to be a friend. Hamas had its headquarters office in Damascus, with the support and protection of al-Assad. Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah were all uneasy allies, but allies nonetheless, with only one common enemy: Israel. Then al-Assad started exterminating peaceful anti-government protesters. Imagine if President Obama sent out warplanes to kill peaceful protesters on the Washington Mall, then you can understand the shock throughout the region to al-Assad's depraved violence. The real turning point came in August, when al-Assad started a massive military assault on a large, peaceful Palestinian refugee camp in Latakia, filled with tens of thousands of women and children Palestinians. The US State Department called the attacks "abhorrent and repulsive." Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu issued a stark warning to Syrian authorities to immediately halt military operations across the country, or Turkey would "take steps," although those steps were not specified: > [indent]<QUOTE>"If these operations do not stop there will be nothing > left to say about the steps that would be taken. This is our > final word to the Syrian authorities, our first expectation is > that these operations stop immediately and unconditionally. > > In the context of human rights this cannot be seen as a domestic > issue."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Turkey never took direct military action against Syria (until 2016 with Operation Euphrates Shield), but the attack on the refugee camp completely changed Mideast politics. Turkey began turning against al-Assad, reviving the old Alawite-Sunni fault line. Hamas withdrew its headquarters from Damascus and moved it to Qatar. The Saudis and Turks began supporting "moderate" Syrian opposition rebels, some of whom aligned themselves with al-Qaeda as the al-Nusra Front. Tens of thousands of jihadists from dozens of countries around the world started pouring into Syria to fight al-Assad, later forming themselves into the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh). It's now five years later, and it's almost beyond belief how Bashar al-Assad, with the support of Russia, Hezbollah and Iran, has caused the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 21st century so far. Syria itself is turning into rubble, but al-Assad's disaster goes well beyond Syria's borders. Sectarian tensions are at a fever pitch, with Iran and Saudi Arabia close to war. Al-Assad has created millions of refugees, flooding into neighboring countries and Europe. So Erdogan did not foment an armed uprising against al-Assad. Al-Assad did that all by himself by his extermination of peaceful protesters, with a major turning point at his massive military attack on the Palestinian refugee camp in Latakia. Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Syria, Aleppo, Bashar al-Assad, John Kerry, Sergei Lavrov, Igor Konashenkov, Alawites, Iran, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Nusra Front, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh Palestinians, Ahmet Davutoglu Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 25-Sep-16 World View -- US will deport tens of thousands of Haitian immigrants - John J. Xenakis - 09-24-2016 *** 25-Sep-16 World View -- US will deport tens of thousands of Haitian immigrants surging toward California This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Surge of nearly 40,000 Haitians on their way to California **** From 2004 - Poor neighborhood in Haiti Sarah Saldaña, Director of U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement said that new figures indicate that 40,000 Haitians are on their way to the Mexican border with the United States. Most are headed for Tijuana, from where they expect to cross the border legally to San Diego, California. Once in the United States, they travel to established Haitian communities in New York and Miami. Following the enormous January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, the US granted Haitian nationals "Temporary Protected Status (TPS)," which permits them to live and work in the United States without being subject to deportation. The following table shows the number of undocumented Haitians arriving in San Diego and Miami as of August 31, 2016: Year San Diego Miami ---- -------- ----- 2014 479 249 2015 339 266 2016 4,346 216 There is already an emergency situation on the San Diego border, where 4,346 Haitians have arrived so far this year, while only 216 arrived in all of last year. Saldaña says that information from Central American countries indicates that tens of thousands more are en route. According to Saldaña, many Haitians have been working in Brazil and other South American countries, but are now out of work because of severe economic downturns. Up until Thursday, Haitians presenting themselves at the US border were allowed into the US under the TPS humanitarian program. But as of Thursday, Haitians seeking entry now are subject to a fast-track process called Expedited Removal that entails immediate detention, likely followed by deportation. However, that plan will require cooperation with the government of Haiti, which has yet to make a statement. It's unclear what will happen if Haiti refuses to accept deported immigrants. Even before the earthquake, Haiti was one of the poorest countries in the world, and it still hasn't recovered from the earthquake. Furthermore, Haiti's government is in chaos, run by acting president Jocelerme Privert after Michel Martelly stepped down as president without a successor. Haiti Libre and LA Times and US Dept. of Homeland Security and Haiti Libre Related Articles
**** **** How Haitians travel to the United States **** Research gathered by the Miami Herald shows the path that Haitians take to arrive in the US. The travel begins with a plane trip to Rio de Janeiro in southern Brazil, and continues through 12 countries:
That's how it used to work, until Thursday. Starting then, the Haitians crossing the border are held in detention until a hearing can be held, after which they'll be deported. Miami Herald Related Articles **** **** Illinois Rep Luis V. Gutiérrez demands TPS status for Ecuadorians **** A strong earthquake struck Ecuador on April 16 of this year, killing 700, with thousands injured and homeless, leading to demands that Ecuadorians be given the same Temporary Protected Status (TPS) that was granted to Haitians after their 2011 earthquake. According to government figures, there are more than 200,000 undocumented Ecuadoreans in the U.S. among the one million Ecuadoreans residing in the country. Many of those would benefit from the TPS if granted. Besides Haiti, several Latin American countries have TPS status. El Salvador has had TPS status since 2001 because of a devastating earthquake. Nicaragua and Honduras have had TPS status since a hurricane that happened 18 years ago. According to a statement by Rep. Luis V. Gutiérrez (D-IL): > [indent]<QUOTE>"My constituents and I would greatly appreciate > knowing what exactly the State Department recommended to DHS on > this matter,” the Congressman wrote today to Secretary Kerry. “In > the interests of transparency, especially for the numerous > Ecuadorian nationals living in the U.S. and those U.S. citizens > with strong ties to Ecuador, I urge you to make public the > recommendation that was made by State to DHS regarding TPS... > Citizens of Ecuador and citizens of the United States deserve to > know how the U.S. government is deliberating – or failing to > deliberate – a TPS designation."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Gutiérrez added that "People’s lives hang in the balance." Lawndale (Ill) News (1-Sep) and Telesur TV (18-May-2016) and US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Haiti, Temporary Protected Status, TPS, Tijuana, San Diego, Miami, Sarah Saldaña, U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jocelerme Privert, Michel Martelly, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Darian Gap, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatamela, Mexico, Luis V. Gutiérrez Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 26-Sep-16 World View -- Murder of Jordan writer exposes fault line between secularist - John J. Xenakis - 09-25-2016 *** 26-Sep-16 World View -- Murder of Jordan writer exposes fault line between secularists and Muslim Brotherhood This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Writer Nahed Hattar, accused of blasphemy, gunned down in Amman, Jordan **** A mourner holds up a photo of Nahed Hattar, who was murdered on Sunday (Reuters) Nahed Hattar, 56, a controversial satirical writer in Jordan, was gunned down on Sunday in front of a courthouse where he had been on trial for blasphemy for posting a cartoon deemed offensive to Islam. He was shot by Riad Abdullah, 49, a conservative Muslim and former imam, thought to be a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood. Hattar, self-described as a Christian atheist, was arrested on August 15 on charges of insulting religion in a satirical cartoon posted on Facebook. He intended for his cartoon to expose the hypocrisy of jihadists in the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh). The cartoon was captioned "In paradise," and depicted an ISIS jihadist in a tent in bed with two woman. A bearded Allah opens the flap of the tent, and has this conversation with the jihadist: > [indent]<QUOTE>Allah: “May your evening be joyous, Abu Saleh, do you > need anything?” > > Jihadist: “Yes Lord, bring me the glass of wine from over there > and tell Jibril [the Angel Gabriel] to bring me some > cashews. After that send me an eternal servant to clean the floor > and take the empty plates with you.” > > Jihadist continues: “Don’t forget to put a door on the tent so > that you knock before you enter next time, your > gloriousness.”<END QUOTE>[/indent] The phrase "Your gloriousness" ("Subhanekh") is considered insulting because it's a play on the word for "Glory be to Allah" ("Subhanallah"). To see the actual cartoon, click on the "Clarion Project" link below. Hattar was extremely controversial not only because he was a secularist and an atheist, but also because he was a strong supporter of Syria's president Bashar al-Assad, and a critic of ISIS and al-Qaeda. So far, Jordan has escaped the worst of the sectarian and ethnic violence that has occurred in other Mideast countries, although there have been some terrorist acts. The worst so far was an ISIS suicide car bombing near the Syrian border in June, killing seven Jordanian soldiers. Jordan reacted by closing the border with Syria. Because of the blatant nature of Sunday's attack in the heart of Amman, Jordan's capital city, it's feared that sectarian tensions between secularists and Islamists will increase, triggering tit-for-tat revenge attacks. Jordan Times and AP and Clarion Project (15-Aug) Related Articles
**** **** Nahed Hattar shooting exposes Jordan's secularist vs Muslim Brotherhood fault line **** The family of Nahed Hattar is blaming his murder on Jordan's prime minister, Hani Mulki, for bringing him to trial on blasphemy charges in the first place, and for not protecting him from extremists. In a statement, the family said, "Many fanatics wrote on social media calling for his killing and lynching, and the government did nothing against them." In the aftermath of the shooting, Mulki and his cabinet were forced to resign. However, the King Abdullah of Jordan asked Mulki to stay on as a caretaker, and then to form a new government with a new cabinet. However, Jordanian society is deeply split. Muslim Brotherhood MP Dima Tahboub wrote, "Seculars are the downfall of our society." One analyst said, "I am deeply disturbed by what has happened today, and even more by the fact that some people are celebrating the murder on social media." Other tweets include the following: > [indent]<QUOTE>"The ugliness that lurks within the Jordanian masses > rears its head in the response to the assassination of > #NahedHattar." > > "To hell and good riddance, God bless the shooter, (We) are a > people God is proud of." > > "I disagree with Nahed Hattar’s ideas, but I’m afraid for my > country and my children after seeing all the tweets that have come > out welcoming his killing!"<END QUOTE>[/indent] Jordan's King Abdullah was interviewed on Sunday on CBS's 60 Minutes, but the interview had been recorded before Hattar's murder. Petra (Jordan government) and Al Bawaba and Middle East Eye and 60 Minutes Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Jordan, Nahed Hattar, Riad Abdullah, Muslim Brotherhood, Syria, Bashar al-Assad, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh Hani Mulki, King Abdullah, Dima Tahboub Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 27-Sep-16 World View -- US, UK, UN officials accuse Syria and Russia of barbarism - John J. Xenakis - 09-26-2016 *** 27-Sep-16 World View -- US, UK, UN officials accuse Syria and Russia of barbarism and war crimes This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Russian warplanes drop phosphorus bombs and bunker buster bombs on Aleppo **** White helmet workers in Aleppo find a small child in the rubble after a bombing (CNN) In 2015, Syria's army suffered a string of defeats, and even al-Assad admitted that his army was in danger of collapse. That was turned around when Russia fully entered the war in September of last year. Earlier this year on March 15, Russia's president Vladimir Putin announced that most of Russia's forces in Syria would be withdrawn because "the objectives set before the Defense Ministry and the Armed Forces have on the whole been achieved." Russia has been forced to reverse this withdrawal, as Bashar al-Assad's Syrian army appeared last month once again to be collapsing. Furthermore, Turkey has invaded Syria with "Operation Euphrates Shield," and is setting up a growing "safe zone" in Syria along Turkey's border that will not easily be displaced. Other regions of Syria are being controlled by the Kurds, by the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh), and by Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Nusra Front, now Jabhat Fateh al-Sham or JFS). I heard one analyst say that Al-Assad is being reduced to be ruler of "Alawite-istan," meaning that al-Assad, an Alawite, may end up being president of only a small portion of Syria along the Mediterranean Sea. Hoping to prevent complete disaster for al-Assad, Russia is back with more force than ever, and with bigger weapons than ever -- phosphorous incendiary bombs that suffocate people by sucking up all the oxygen, cluster munitions, and huge "bunker buster" bombs that penetrate deep underground by punching holes in concrete before detonating, bringing down whole buildings. Some reports indicate that the Russians have targeted hospitals whose operating rooms have moved to the basement for safety, but are now vulnerable to bunker buster bombs. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said, "Let us remember: the fighting has forced hospitals and schools to operate in basements. These bombs are not busting bunkers; they are demolishing ordinary people looking for any last refuge of safety." Foreign Policy and Daily Mail (London) Related Articles
**** **** Comparisons of Syria civil war to Sri Lanka civil war **** I heard an analyst today compare the war in Syria to the Sri Lanka civil war. From the point of view of Generational Dynamics, that comparison does not hold up. In fact, the situation is Syria is almost the exact opposite of the situation in Sri Lanka in 2009. As long-time readers may recall, as the Sri Lanka civil war approached a climax in May 2009, every news organization and analyst that reported on the civil war were predicting that the civil war would continue on for months or years, because it had already gone on for 26 years. As far as I know, every analysis in the world was wrong except the Generational Dynamics analysis. As I had been saying for months earlier, the Sri Lanka civil war was a generational crisis war, headed for an explosive climax, and when that climax was finally reached, then the war would be over once and for all. The comparison I made was to the surrender of Berlin and Tokyo that ended World War II once and for all. In January 2008, the low-level violence turned into a full scale generational crisis war, as we reported at the time. Finally, in May 2009, the Sinhalese army trapped the Tamil Tiger militants in a U.N.-declared "safe zone" and slaughtered them, including a number of civilians, although 50,000 civilians that had been trapped there were freed. That was the end of the war. This analyst said that al-Assad and Putin expect a similar outcome in Syria from the current flattening of Aleppo. This is close to being delusional. The Syria war is an Awakening era war, and they following a predictable pattern that I've described many times in countries like Burundi, Thailand, Zimbabwe, South Sudan, and others. The Syria war should have fizzled in 2011 or 2012, but continued only because of the depraved violence of Bashar al-Assad, backed up force from Iran and Hezbollah, and especially by massive flattening of civilian neighborhoods by Russian bombs. The pattern for an Awakening era war is that it runs for a while, then it stops because of some kind of peace agreement, then picks up again a few months or years later. The primary pattern of an Awakening era war is this alternation between conflict and "peace" -- where the peace is characterized by peaceful demonstrations and protests. The bombing of Aleppo does not change that fundamental pattern. World War II ended with the fall of Berlin, and with the nuking of Japanese cities. The Sri Lanka war ended with the trapping and slaughter of the Tamil Tiger rebels. But none of that is true in Aleppo. Consider the statistic that some 600 civilians in Aleppo were killed over the weekend. That's a lot of civilians, but that kind of slaughter isn't enough to stop the Kurds, ISIS, al-Nusra or Turkey. There are over 200,000 civilians living in Aleppo, and Russia's phosphorous incendiary bombs, cluster munitions, and "bunker buster" bombs are not going to end the war. At times like this I become philosophical. If policy makers and politicians understood generational theory, then they wouldn't make so many stupid mistakes. But one can't expect delusional leaders like al-Assad and Putin to act rationally, unfortunately. Al Jazeera Related Articles
**** **** US, UK, UN officials accuse Syria and Russia of barbarism and war crimes **** Relations between Russia and the West reached a vitriolic height at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council on Sunday. In the past, Western politicians diplomatically refrained from criticizing Russia, in the hope from bringing peace to Syria. But Western officials have been made fools of so many times, and the Syrian war has been such a geopolitical disaster that Western officials no longer see the point of being diplomatic. Samantha Power, the US Ambassador to the UN accused Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Ambassador to the UN, of repeated lying. She added: > [indent]<QUOTE>"What Russia is sponsoring and doing is not > counterterrorism, it is barbarism. Instead of pursuing peace, > Russia and Assad make war. Instead of helping get life-saving aid > to civilians, Russia and Assad are bombing the humanitarian > convoys, hospitals and first responders who are trying desperately > to keep people alive."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he was "appalled" by the military escalation and that the use of bunker-busting bombs "brings the violence to new depths of barbarity." Matthew Rycroft, Britain's ambassador to the UN, said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"After five years of conflict, you might think that > the regime has had its fill of barbarity -- that its sick > bloodlust against its own people has finally run its course. > > But this weekend, the regime and Russia have instead plunged to > new depths and unleashed a new hell on Aleppo. This isn't > Pompeii."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Sergei Lavrov said that the Western accusations were an attempt to deflect attention from last week's accidental bombing of a Syrian army unit: > [indent]<QUOTE>"I would like to emphasize that the Americans and > their Western allies, for one thing, want to distract public > attention from what had happened in Deir Ezzor."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Syrian officials later said that the Deir Ezzor bombing was "intentional." Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov expressed outrage at the charges of barbarism and war crimes directed at Russia: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We note the overall unacceptable tone and rhetoric of > the representatives of the United Kingdom and the United States, > which can damage and harm our relations."<END QUOTE>[/indent] It's particularly ironic for Peskov to worry about damaging and harming Russia's relations with the West. Guardian (London) and CNN and Russia Today Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Syria, Bashar al-Assad, Russia, Vladimir Putin, Turkey, Operation Euphrates Shield, Ban Ki-moon, Aleppo, Iran, Hezbollah, Sergei Lavrov, Samantha Power, Matthew Rycroft, Sri Lanka, Tamil Tigers, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Nusra Front, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, JFS, Front for the Conquest of Syria Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 28-Sep-16 World View -- As ISIS loses territory, it turns increasingly to terrorism - John J. Xenakis - 09-27-2016 *** 28-Sep-16 World View -- As ISIS loses territory, it turns increasingly to terrorism This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** ISIS losing territory in Iraq and Syria **** Smoke rising from a burning oil well in the town of Qayyara as set on fire by ISIS as they fled the town (Rudaw) Ever since the so-called Islamic State (IS or ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) shocked the entire Mideast by capturing Mosul in Iraq in June, 2014, it's been an important objective of Iraq's army to recapture Mosul, and indeed it's been an important objective of the Iraqis, Kurds, Turks and Syrians to stop the spread of ISIS. Iraq's Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi has repeatedly said that he wants the army to begin to take Mosul back from ISIS before the end of 2016. Other analysts say that 2016 is unrealistic, but recapturing Mosul during 2017 is realistic. At one time, ISIS controlled huge swaths of territory in Syria and Iraq, and seemed unstoppable. But in the last year, ISIS has suffered some significant defeats. Iraq's army and Shia militias backed by the U.S. led air coalition have successfully driven ISIS out of Tikrit, Ramadi and Fallujah during 2016. The also recaptured Shargat and Qayyara, two oil rich towns in northern Iraq. Kurdish forces drove ISIS out of southern Kirkuk’s Hamrin and Hijel oilfields. ISIS had depended on oil for a large part of its income, ISIS no longer holds an oil well in Iraq, which has severely weakened its finances. ISIS has also suffered badly in Syria. ISIS had controlled Manbij and Jarabulus in Syria along the border with Turkey, allowing ISIS to move people and supplies back and forth across the border. Kurdish forces recaptured both cities in a month-long push. But then Turkey invaded Syria in Operation Euphrates Shield, and drove the Kurds out of both cities. Some analysts and politicians are saying that, after so many defeats, ISIS is close to total defeat, especially after Mosul is recaptured. However, Mosul may be a lot harder to recapture than analysts expect. Mosul has a population of over 2 million people, almost all Sunni Muslims and ethnic Iraqis. This means that both Shia militias and Kurdish militias will be reluctant to take part in the military operations. Even more important is that fact that ISIS is expected to "fight to the last man." In the smaller cities, ISIS forces simply fled as the opposing armies approached. But Mosul is preparing for a major defense of its control of Mosul. ISIS has built huge walls in Mosul's airport, to prevent landings. It has fortified routes into the city by digging vast trenches that could be filled with oil and set alight. And it is digging vast networks of tunnels across the city where they can hide from enemy fire. The battle to recapture Mosul is expected to be very big and very bloody. Already a major new flood refugees are fleeing from Mosul, and there may be a major new humanitarian disaster in progress in the next few months. Guardian (London, 7-Sep) and Rudaw (Iraq-Kurdish) and Independent (London) Related Articles
**** **** Pyrrhic victory over ISIS could create a 'terrorist diaspora' **** A "Pyrrhic victory" is a victory, but one that comes at too great a cost. After King Pyrrhus of Epirus defeated the Romans in 279 BC, the losses were so great that he's quoted as saying, "One more victory against the Romans and we will be ruined." Many people fear that the defeat of ISIS could be a Pyrrhic victory. This was most clearly stated on Tuesday by FBI Directory James Comey, who said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"The so-called caliphate will be crushed. The > challenge will be: Through the fingers of that crush are going to > come hundreds of very, very dangerous people. They will not all > die on the battlefield in Syria and Iraq. There will be a > terrorist diaspora sometime in the next two to five years like > we've never seen before. ... > > We must prepare ourselves and our allies particularly in western > Europe to confront that threat because when ISIL is reduced to an > insurgency and those killers flow out they will try to come to > western Europe and try to come here to kill innocent > people."<END QUOTE>[/indent] There are tens of thousands of jihadists in ISIS, having come from over 80 countries around the world to fight Syria's president Bashar al-Assad. Crushing the ISIS "caliphate" will be a great victory, for which politicians will heartily congratulate themselves and take credit, but there will still be tens of thousands of jihadists. Some will remain in Syria and Iraq, but as we've been writing since 2012, thousands of them will return to their home countries, including America and Europe, create, as Comey said, "a terrorist diaspora like we've never seen before." UPI Related Articles KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Iraq, Syria, Mosul, Haidar al-Abadi, Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh Tikrit, Ramadi, Fallujah, Shargat, Qayyara, James Comey, Hamrin, Hijel, Manbij, Jarabulus, Turkey, Operation Euphrates Shield Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 29-Sep-16 World View -- Wells Fargo receives laughable 'punishment' formassive crimie - John J. Xenakis - 09-28-2016 *** 29-Sep-16 World View -- Wells Fargo receives laughable 'punishment' for massive criminal fraud This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Wells Fargo found to have defrauded millions of customers **** Wells Fargo branch in New York (AP) An audit consulting firm has determined that Wells Fargo opened over 1.5 million "ghost" bank accounts in the name of customers who didn't even know about it. Apparently the way it worked was as follows:
This wasn't one or two rogue employees. This was thousands of employees defrauding millions of customers. The size of this fraud is mind-boggling. The number of crooked employees is staggering. The number of defrauded customers is beyond belief. And yet it's clear that nobody will go to jail. The crooked employees will keep their huge bonuses, and even if they've been fired, they'll be perfectly free to go on to other jobs and defraud other people, because with the rise of Generation-X, fraud has essentially become a free crime. Wells Fargo was fined $185 million by the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. Wells Fargo's net income in the second quarter was $5.6 billion, so the fine is just 3.3% of one quarter's net income (or less than 1% of annual income). Wells Fargo's CEO John Stumpf was fired and fined $41 million, but that leaves him with more than $100 million in company stock and millions in salary. I've already used the words "mind-boggling," "staggering" and "beyond belief," so there are no words left to describe the enormity of this farce. Bankers can get away with almost anything today, with no punishment except sometimes to give back a small portion of their fraudulent gains, and then they're free to go to the next fraud. I've written about this many times in the past. First there was the "financial crisis" of the mid-2000s decade. That was created by Gen-Xers who poured out of colleges in the 1990s with masters degrees in financial engineering. Those crooks knowingly created tens of trillions of dollars in fraudulent securities, and sold them to investors knowing that they were defrauding the investors. And not a single goddam one of these crooks has gone to jail or even been criminally prosecuted. Instead, President Obama's Department of Justice adamantly refused to prosecute these crooks, but instead chose to accept billions of dollars in campaign contributions from the very banks that had made trillions of dollars fraudulently, putting millions of people into bankruptcy or homelessness after being unable to pay their sub-prime mortgages. I've never believed this massive level of government corruption was possible in America, but it's happening. In 2010, congressional Financial Crisis Inquiry hearings provide 'smoking gun' evidence of widespread criminal fraud. I expected investigations and prosecutions to begin at that time, but there were none. In fact, as described in the movie "The Big Short," the crooks were financial rewarded by the administration for their criminal fraud. I've written many, many times, that the failure of the administration to criminally prosecute these crooked backs would leave the same bankers in the same jobs finding other ways to defraud people. That's exactly what's happened. The massive Wells Fargo frauds began in 2011, according to reports. The massive Libor and Forex rate-rigging began around the same time. I believe that when the 2010 Financial Crisis Inquiry hearings were completed and the crooked bankers were rewarded instead of being prosecuted, it was a signal to bankers that they could do anything they wanted, with impunity. This does not mean all bankers, of course, but it means a significant minority. As for bankers, I remember when I was growing up in the 1950s how much my mother hated bankers, and thought they were all crooks. Bankers seemed like nice people to me, so I never understood why she felt that way. But I understand now. She had grown up in the 1930s, a time when bankers were just as crooked as they are today. If you'd like to take a few moments for some musical entertainment, then listen to the song "Little Tin Box" from the 1959 Broadway Musical Fiorello!, about how 1930s politicians made millions of dollars and claimed they did it by saving their pennies in a "Little Tin Box." YouTube: Fiorello - 'Little Tin Box' - original Broadway version and CNN and LA Times Related Articles
**** **** Reasons given why no criminal prosecutions of bankers for criminal fraud **** In reading and listening to news reports on the financial crisis, reasons are sometimes given for why no one has been criminally prosecuted. Above, I gave what I think is the real reasons -- federal government corruption. But mainstream media reporters don't want to criticize this administration, so they look for other reasons. > [indent]<QUOTE>"All the banking laws were repealed by the Clinton and > Bush administrations, so they can't be prosecuted."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The laws on criminal fraud have never been repealed. The 2010 congressional Financial Crisis Inquiry hearings found "smoking gun" evidence of criminal fraud. > [indent]<QUOTE>"If bankers are prosecuted, then banks will become > unable to do business, because they'll be unable to hire the right > talent for the most difficult jobs."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Believe it or not, I've actually seen this utterly moronic reason given for why bankers weren't prosecuted. Of course talented people will want to work for banks -- to get those 6 and 7 digit salaries, and also to get HONEST bonuses. > [indent]<QUOTE>"Sometimes building a strong case against individuals > can be difficult given how big and complicated banks are, and > sometimes, even when there is evidence, that evidence points not > to the C-suite suits, but middle-manager types."<END QUOTE>[/indent] So what? If some "middle-manager types" are prosecuted, then other "middle-manager types" will fear committing more crimes. As I said, I believe that the failure to prosecute after the 2010 congressional hearings was a signal to bankers that they could do anything they wanted, with impunity. Second, prosecuting "middle-manager types" allows for discovery, and allows for getting low-level employees to turn on their bosses, so that "the C-suite suits" can be prosecuted as well. These reasons all miss the major point: that the Wells Fargo, Libor, Forex and other banking scams came about because bankers knew that they could do anything they wanted, and the worst that would happen is that they'd have to give up a small portion of their fraudulent gains. New York Magazine quotes Notre Dame law professor Jimmy Gurulé in listing many recent instances of banks engaging in massive criminal activity, and coming away only with monetary punishments: > [indent]<QUOTE>"To take just a handful of them: In 2012, Standard > Chartered was found to have violated the U.S.’s economics > sanctions by moving hundreds of billions of dollars for Iran, and > settled for $330 million. In 2012, federal investigators found > that HSBC had, as the Times put it, “transferred billions of > dollars for nations under United States sanctions, enabled Mexican > drug cartels to launder tainted money through the American > financial system, and worked closely with Saudi Arabian banks > linked to terrorist organizations.” HSBC paid $1.92 billion. Then > there was Barclays in 2010 — a fine of $298 million for illegal > dealings with Cuba, Iran, Libya, Sudan, and Myanmar (before > reluctantly approving the settlement, the judge in that case > called it a “sweetheart deal”). Also, Credit Suisse in 2009: it > settled for $536 million in connection with similar > charges."<END QUOTE>[/indent] So if you're a banker, then what's the point of being honest? You can get away with anything you want, and you won't be prosecuted. It's mind-boggling. Washington Post and New York Magazine Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Wells Fargo, John Stumpf, Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, CFPB, Financial Crisis Inquiry, Libor, Forex, The Big Short, Jimmy Gurulé, Notre Dame, Fiorello!, Little Tin Box Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe |