Generational Dynamics World View - Printable Version +- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum) +-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Theories Of History (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: Generational Dynamics World View (/thread-51.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
|
15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - John J. Xenakis - 01-14-2017 *** 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American tanks and troops in decades This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American tanks and troops in decades **** Prime Minister of Poland Beata Szydlo and Maj. Gen. Jaroslaw Mika, commander of Poland's 11th Armored Cavalry Division, conduct a review of U.S. and Polish troops during an official ceremony in Zagan, Poland (DVIDS) People across Poland are celebrating "Operation Resolve," the arrival to Poland the largest US military deployment to Europe in decades. The deployment includes about 4,000 troops and also 2,400 pieces of military equipment, including tanks and Humvees. The deployment is a reaction to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Ukraine's Crimea peninsula. Other countries in eastern Europe are concerned that they will be the next victim of a Russian invasion, and it's hoped that the presence of US troops will deter Russia. Prime Minister Beata Szydlo said, > [indent]<QUOTE>"Welcome to Poland. ... The presence of American > soldiers in Poland is another step in our strategy to ensure > safety and security for Poland and the region. ... > > It's a great day today when we can welcome, here in Zagan, > American soldiers who represent the best, the greatest army in the > world."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Poland's Defense Minister Antoni Macierewicz said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We have waited for you for a very long time. We > waited for decades, sometimes feeling we had been left alone, > sometimes almost losing hope, sometimes feeling that we were the > only ones who protected civilization from aggression that came > from the east."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The American troops will be part of a Nato contingent that will include troops from Britain and Canada. The troops will be rotated every nine months through Poland, the Baltic countries, Bulgaria and Romania in order to provide a technical workaround to a promise made to Moscow after the fall of the Soviet Union that Nato would not permanently base large numbers of forces east of Germany. Deutsche Welle and CNN and AFP **** **** US troop deployment in Poland angers Russia **** Russia's president Vladimir Putin is always calling everyone he dislikes "Nazis" and "Fascists," but he doesn't like to admit that Russia's were also "Nazis and Fascists" prior Adolf Hitler's invasion of Russia. Hitler and Josef Stalin had signed a treaty (the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact) in 1939 where they split up Poland between them. The agreement also divided Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, and Romania between the Nazis and the Communists. It was only in 1941, when the Nazis invaded Russia, that Stalin finally learned being a Nazi is not a good thing. Even so, after Hitler was defeated, Stalin's Soviet forces occupied Poland and other east European countries for decades. These events are far ancient history to today's young generations in America and Western Europe, but they're still very raw memories to the people of Poland and other East European countries. They've seen Russia invade and annex parts of Georgia and Ukraine, and they have no doubts that Russia would invade their countries, as has happened in the past. Putin press spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the US troops in Poland would be "a threat to Russia's national security." It's hard to believe that 5,000 American troops would be a threat to Russia's security, inasmuch as Russia has something like 330,000 troops along its western border. Furthermore, Russia has long-range Iskander cruise missiles in Kaliningrad that can be made nuclear. The US deployment is being described as a "tripwire" force, designed to prevent Russia from getting away with an easy invasion of some other country, as they did with Georgia and Ukraine. It's thought that Russia would not be willing to risk a larger war by attacking an American force of any size. Russian military expert Vladimir Kozin says that another reasons for the deployment is that outgoing President Obama wants to box in Donald Trump: > [indent]<QUOTE>"According to the German military, some 900 railroad > cars will be needed to deliver all this equipment to the > deployment sites. But what is the reason? First, [US President > Barack] Obama wants to play a mean trick on President-elect Donald > Trump who won the election."<END QUOTE>[/indent] It's worth mentioning that there's one other possible theory why Obama did this in the last few days of his administration: It's possible that Trump asked Obama to do it before leaving office, so that he wouldn't have to do it. Kozin said that the deployment is unprecedented since the collapse of the Soviet Union, and that the US is forcing Europe to accept it: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Finally, the US wants to maintain tensions around the > world and particularly in Europe. They want to turn the region > into another tinderbox ready to ignite. This number one > priority. ... > > The US and NATO plan to increase aerial, anti-submarine, missile > defense and intelligence activities with the use of heavy military > equipment. In order to justify sanctions, the situation needs to > be tense all the time. Europe is becoming a prisoner of this new > Cold War initiated by Obama."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Sputnik News (Moscow) and Deutsche Welle (14-Nov-2016) and Sky News Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Poland, Beata Szydlo, Jaroslaw Mika, Antoni Macierewicz, Operation Resolve, Ukraine, Crimea, Bulgaria, Romania, Russia, Vladimir Putin, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, Dmitry Peskov, Kaliningrad, Vladimir Kozin Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - SomeGuy - 01-14-2017 Lol, in recent news, Poland admits that it has been longing for foreign tanks on its soil again! How have you been, John? RE: Generational Dynamics World View - John J. Xenakis - 01-16-2017 *** 16-Jan-17 World View -- With Libya in chaos, migrant deal with Italy collapses This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Over 100 migrants drown in Mediterranean after their dinghy sinks **** Migrants in a dinghy rescued on Thursday of last week (AP) Italy's Coast Guard was able to rescue only four people after a rubber dinghy with 110 migrants sank in rough waters in the Mediterranean Sea about 30 miles off the coast of Libya. These situations are brought about by people smugglers. They charge desperate migrants thousands of dollars each. Typically, the people smugglers put hundreds of migrants into a single large rubber dinghy, and give the migrants enough fuel to leave Libyan waters and a cell phone to use to call the Italian coast guard. The four who were rescued were among 550 who were rescued on one day, Friday. It's expected (or feared) that, like last year, hundreds of thousands of migrants will attempt to cross from Libya to Italy this year. According to Malta Prime Minister Joseph Muscat: > [indent]<QUOTE>"Come next spring, the number of people crossing over > the Mediterranean will reach record levels. The choice is trying > to do something now, or meeting urgently in April, May ... and try > to do a deal then."<END QUOTE>[/indent] It's also expected that there will be thousands of migrants departing from Egypt, with the same objective. Libya Herald and Reuters and Telegraph (London) and AP **** **** With Libya in chaos, migrant deal with Italy collapses **** Italy reopened its embassy in Libya's capital city Tripoli last week, the first Western country to do so since 2015. Italy had hoped that doing so would lead to an agreement with the government of Libya to slow the flow of migrants trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea to Italy. Unfortunately, the agreement was never signed by the government of Libya because the phrase "the government of Libya" is meaningless. There are several governments in Libya:
None of these three governments recognizes either of the others, and so there's no hope of getting any agreement. In fact, the Beida government last week accused Italy's Coast Guard of violating Libyan sovereignty with its rescue program. Italy had received the approval of the Government of National Accord, but in a note last week, the Beida government said, > [indent]<QUOTE>"An Italian military vessel loaded with soldiers and > ammunition has entered Libyan territorial waters. It is a clear > violation of the UN charter and a form of repeated > aggression."<END QUOTE>[/indent] One other government could be mentioned -- the so-called National Salvation Government, led by Khalifa Ghwell, who claimed several days ago that his forces had seized several ministries in Tripoli, and that the Government of National Accord (GNA) had been defeated. His claims could not be confirmed. VOA and Libya Herald and North Africa Post and Libya Herald Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Libya, Italy, Mediterranean Sea, Malta, Joseph Muscat, Egypt, Libya Dawn, General National Congress, GNC, Libya National Army, LNA, Khalifah Haftar, Government of National Accord, GNA, National Salvation Government, Khalifa Ghwell Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - John J. Xenakis - 01-16-2017 (01-14-2017, 10:17 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: Lol, in recent news, Poland admits that it has been longing for foreign tanks on its soil again! Just barely surviving, and you? RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - SomeGuy - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 12:09 AM)John J. Xenakis Wrote:(01-14-2017, 10:17 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: Lol, in recent news, Poland admits that it has been longing for foreign tanks on its soil again! Am doing fairly well. Am working again, starting up some supplementary classes this week to finish the second degree, all that good stuff. Appreciate the reach out on LinkedIn, too. So, still not convinced of your crisis war alliance configuration, but the prospects (still speculative at this point, but still) of improved relations with Russia give it a little boost, imo. I know that's been keeping you up at night. Dunno about the same with Iran, now. Lot of people in the ole Trump Admin and on Capitol Hill chomping at the bit at the prospect of confronting it once and for all. Which is unfortunate, because I largely agree with your case about social attitudes among their rising Idealists. The post-Awakening changes might not take effect quick enough for our old Idealists, and the value shift is never complete until the conclusion of their next 4T. But we'll see. Have you got any thoughts on dates, over there at Generational Dynamics, on a possible start date for the big 'un? The 2020s are starting to loom real large on the upcoming horizon. 17-Jan-17 World View -- European leaders shocked and surprised at Trump's statements - John J. Xenakis - 01-16-2017 *** 17-Jan-17 World View -- European leaders shocked and surprised at Trump's foreign policy comments This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** China threatens to 'take off the gloves' with Donald Trump **** Trump interview on Monday (dpa) A kind of war of words continues to grow between by president-elect Donald Trump and China's media over Trump's repeated comments appearing to challenge the "One-China Policy," which states that there is one China, not two, but leaves it to mainland China and Taiwan to interpret it differently. Recently, an editorial in China's Global Times threatened "revenge" against Trump over his comments. Although Global Times is Chinese state media, it is the most nationalistic of the state English-language publications, and its editorials are sometimes ignored just ravings. So it's worth noting that the latest editorial with a threat is in China Daily, which is a more mainstream state media outline. The editorial appears to be carefully worded, talking about China's "warm heart" at the beginning, and leaving the threat of taking the "gloves off" almost to the end. According to the editorial, because Trump is making repeated comments, he's now "showing intent" to challenge the policy: > [indent]<QUOTE>"When it comes to tolerance, it is our tradition to > display a big heart. That is why one can normally get away with > making the same mistake twice, as one will be given the benefit of > the doubt. > > But one will seldom be given the benefit of the doubt twice, > because doing the same wrong for a third time shows intent. > > When United States president-elect Donald Trump broke his > country's longstanding diplomatic protocol and answered a > "congratulatory call" from Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen, the Chinese > foreign minister merely responded by calling it a "petty trick" by > Taipei. > > When, just nine days later, Trump told Fox News Sunday the US > would not "be bound by the one-China policy", Beijing simply > reiterated that acknowledgement of one China is fundamental, and > non-negotiable, for healthy ties. > > To many, that was a mistake Trump made twice. ... > > It seems wishful thinking to assume Trump and his team's remarks > on Taiwan have been based on bluster or miscalculation. On the > contrary, it appears the next administration is intending to use > the one-China policy as its trump card. ... > > If Trump is determined to use this gambit on taking office, a > period of fierce, damaging interactions will be unavoidable, as > Beijing will have no choice but to take off the > gloves."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The latest Global Times editorial says that "China cannot and will not offer anything in exchange for the one-China policy, and Trump must understand that." It adds that China will be closely watching what Trump does as president rather than what he has been saying. China Daily and Global Times (Beijing) **** **** European leaders shocked and surprised at Trump's foreign policy comments **** European leaders are expressing shock and surprise at comments made by president-elect Donald Trump in a pair of newspaper interviews. Trump expressed great support for Brexit, referring to the plans underway for Britain to leave the European Union: > [indent]<QUOTE>"I think Brexit’s going to end up being the great > thing. And I predicted it – but the heat I took was > unbelievable. And I said – it’s because people don’t wanna have > other people coming in and destroying their country. I thought the > UK was so smart in getting out."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Trump said that NATO is obsolete: > [indent]<QUOTE>"And I said long time ago that NATO had problems and > the one of them it was obsolete because it was designed many many > years ago. And, number two, the countries weren’t paying what they > were supposed to pay."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Trump's attitudes on immigrants are well-known, after his campaign remarks about Mexican immigrants being rapists and murderers and about deporting all Muslims. He's highly critical of the 2015 remarks by Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel which many people blame for much of the refugee crisis in Europe. In the interview, Trump said: > [indent]<QUOTE>"I have great respect for her (Merkel), I felt she was > a great great leader. I think she made one very catastrophic > mistake – and that was taking all of these illegals, taking all of > the people wherever they come from – and nobody really knows where > they come from."<END QUOTE>[/indent] European leaders have expressed shock and dismay at Trump's remarks, but were careful not to inflame the situation further. Some pointed out that not all immigrants are illegals. From the point of view of Generational Dynamics, the question is: How are these remarks affecting the course of events? As long-time readers are aware, Generational Dynamics predicts that the world is headed for a new world war, and that this will be brought about by a worldwide renewal of nationalism, racism and xenophobia, as the survivors of World War II continue to die off, and memories of the horrors of WW II are forgotten. My own belief is that Trump's remarks will have no effect at all on the course of events, except to create a flurry of global political posturing. The events of the next year may prove or disprove that belief. Euro News and Deutsche Welle and France 24 Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Donald Trump, China, Taiwan, One-China policy, Brexit, Germany, Angela Merkel, Nato Generational Dynamics, Donald Trump, China, Taiwan, One-China policy, Brexit, Germany, Angela Merkel, Nato Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - John J. Xenakis - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 12:42 AM)SomeGuy Wrote:(01-16-2017, 12:09 AM)John J. Xenakis Wrote:(01-14-2017, 10:17 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: Lol, in recent news, Poland admits that it has been longing for foreign tanks on its soil again! You seem to be continuing a conversation that we've had before, but I have no idea who you are, or what this conversation was/is about. RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - SomeGuy - 01-17-2017 Jordan Goodspeed. I used to argue with you about referring to Boko Haram as a Hausa organization when they're really a Kanuri one (am right on that one), whether Thailand was in an Awakening or Crisis (have come around to your view), etc. I was asking if Generation Dynamics has a rough date range for when they think the crisis war will start. 18-Jan-17 World View -- The Gambia's leader, refusing to step down - John J. Xenakis - 01-17-2017 *** 18-Jan-17 World View -- The Gambia's leader, refusing to step down, declares state of emergency This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** The Gambia's leader, refusing to step down, declares state of emergency **** Supporters of incumbent President Yahya Jammeh sit at a campaign rally prior to the 1-Dec-2016 election that Jammeh lost to businessman Adama Barrow (Getty) Britain is withdrawing almost 1,000 tourists from The Gambia, after president Yahya Jammeh declared a state of emergency two days before Jammeh's term in office ends. Like many other African leaders, Jammeh is refusing to step down when his term in office officially ends on January 19. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has been mediating in the crisis hoping to convince Jammeh to step down peacefully on Thursday, something that now appears will not happen. There has been an implied threat that Senegal and other ECOWAS countries will send in a military force. Meanwhile, thousands of Gambians are fleeing the country or sending their children abroad, fearing a possible war. However, it's not clear what the mission of such a military force would be, as some and perhaps most of The Gambian army is remaining loyal to Jammeh. Independent (London) and Guardian (London) and The Point (The Gambia) Related Articles
**** **** Burundi's leader, refusing to step down, withdraws peacekeeping troops fighting al-Shabaab in Somalia **** Burundi's president Pierre Nkurunziza is withdrawing his troops from the African Union peacekeeping force, over a pay dispute with the European Union. The EU pays the salaries of the Burundi peacekeeping troops, but they don't want to pay the money to Nkurunziza out of fear that he'll just put the money into his overseas bank account, or use the money to buy weapons to be used against his political opponents. Like many African leaders, Nkurunziza is refusing to step down, and instead is remaining in office in violation of Burundi's constitution. As usual in Africa, this is about tribal violence. Nkurunziza is an ethnic Hutu, he's conducting torture, sexual violence, arbitrary jailings, targeted assassinations and summary executions against his political opposition, almost all from the Tutsi tribe. So the EU doesn't want to pay the soldiers' salaries, around $5.3 million per month, to the Nkurunziza government, but instead want to pay it directly to the soldiers. The peacekeeping force is really badly needed in Somalia, to fight the jihadist terror group al-Shabaab. Nkurunziza is now pulling out his troops from the peacekeeping force, hoping that he can extort the money out of the EU and use it to bash more political opponents. Vanguard (Nigeria) and Africa News and All Africa Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, The Gambia, Yahya Jammeh, Adama Barrow, Economic Community of West African States ECOWAS, Senegal, Burundi, Pierre Nkurunziza, African Union, European Union, Somalia, al-Shabaab Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - Warren Dew - 01-17-2017 (01-17-2017, 12:04 AM)SomeGuy Wrote: Jordan Goodspeed. If I understand his theory correctly, it's a probabilistic thing, with gradually increasing probability. That makes giving a date range tough. Hopefully he'll correct me if I'm wrong. RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - SomeGuy - 01-17-2017 (01-17-2017, 11:45 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:(01-17-2017, 12:04 AM)SomeGuy Wrote: Jordan Goodspeed. I don't think the one should necessarily preclude the other, but we'll see. RE: Generational Dynamics World View - SomeGuy - 01-18-2017 (01-17-2017, 12:34 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: I know there are quite a few Kremlin bootlicking NATO haters on this forum. Thanks for clearing that up. Way to take a stand. RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - John J. Xenakis - 01-18-2017 (01-17-2017, 12:04 AM)SomeGuy Wrote: > Jordan Goodspeed. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh. Jordan!!! Of course I recognize your name, where I didn't recognize "SomeGuy". Yeah, I did reach out to you on LinkedIn, though I wasn't sure it was you -- it might have been some OTHER Jordan Goodspeed. Thanks for the correction on the Kanuris. If memory serves, I thanked you for the correction at the time. As for Thailand, I've always been nervous about that timeline, even though I'm pretty sure it's correct. (South Sudan is another current example that makes me nervous.) In Thailand, what would really nail it is showing that the current "red shirts" and "yellow shirts" are respectively provably connected to the two sides in the Cambodian war, either through direct support or indirect support. > I was asking if Generation Dynamics has a rough date range for > when they think the crisis war will start. Well, you really can't tell. The Crisis Era began in 2003, so we're pretty deep already into the Fourth Turning. The question is: When will the Regeneracy occur, and how will it occur? There are many possible scenarios for how the war will start. It could be in the East or South China Sea, Pakistan vs India, in the Mideast, or even something involving Ukraine. It's really a crap shoot as to what will trigger a war. And I like to compare a generational crisis war to an inappropriate love affair. It's completely illogical and emotional. A person may have sex with someone even knowing that it will end badly, even destroy people's lives, but it happens anyway. Similarly, the South attacked Fort Sumter with no chance of winning the war. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor with no chance of winning the war. The Chinese think we're weak and won't even fight back, and they might start something at any time. Here are three examples showing how hard (or impossible) it is to specify anything like an exact time or scenario:
Warren's point is right as well. As you go deeper and deeper into a fourth turning, then there's a continual increase in nationalism, racism and xenophobia, so the climate gets better and better for a regeneracy. RE: 15-Jan-17 World View -- Poland welcomes biggest deployment of American troops - SomeGuy - 01-18-2017 I thought you might. Sorry, Have fallen back into old habits without always remembering that I changed my handle. Yeah, you did thank me (which I appreciate), I mentioned it solely to jog your memory. As for Thailand, yeah, it's kinda iffy. The king is finally dead, and thus far the red/yellow conflict hasn't shown signs of flaring into something more dramatic. I remember going back and forth with you about it, 'cause it's real easy to identify the active turnings versus the reactionary ones, but harder to distinguish which are which (2T vs 4T). Like I said, I've swung around to your view, but I suppose we'll see. I agree with the thing about timing, too. There's lots of kindling, some sparks, but as yet, no flames (at least among the principals). Trump looks like he could prove a catalyst. Should be interesting (for the apocryphal Chinese curse values of the same). Was just curious if you had settled on something a little more definite. Well, thanks. RE: Generational Dynamics World View - Warren Dew - 01-18-2017 John - and anyone else interested - how much warning do you think we'll get before cities start getting destroyed? Seems like the Civil war escalated pretty fast, but the US had a few years warning about WWII due to its starting elsewhere. Just wondering at what point to move kids out of likely target areas. RE: Generational Dynamics World View - SomeGuy - 01-18-2017 (01-18-2017, 09:12 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: John - and anyone else interested - how much warning do you think we'll get before cities start getting destroyed? Seems like the Civil war escalated pretty fast, but the US had a few years warning about WWII due to its starting elsewhere. Just wondering at what point to move kids out of likely target areas. If you're genuinely worried New Hampshire and Oregon have little to no major targets (cities or missile silos both) and fall outside of the major fallout patterns. Most of the radiation would vanish after the first couple of days, too (alpha radiation is a bit rough on nuclei). You also have to wonder, since there isn't quite the same hair-trigger disposition of forces or huge conventional forces imbalance a la the Red Army poised against Western Europe, whether nuclear weapons would be a first resort at all. RE: Generational Dynamics World View - Warren Dew - 01-18-2017 (01-18-2017, 09:23 PM)SomeGuy Wrote:(01-18-2017, 09:12 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: John - and anyone else interested - how much warning do you think we'll get before cities start getting destroyed? Seems like the Civil war escalated pretty fast, but the US had a few years warning about WWII due to its starting elsewhere. Just wondering at what point to move kids out of likely target areas. I'm not sure why anyone posting on this forum wouldn't be genuinely worried. But then, lots of people say they believe in evolution and don't apply their knowledge to their own lifestyle. Part of what I'm asking about is what the escalation to nuclear weapons is likely to look like and how long it will take - minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years? Okay, that's pretty much all I was asking in my previous post. You know, like will I have enough warning to buy and move to a home in New Hampshire or would I need a vacation cottage purchased in advance? 19-Jan-17 World View -- European anger and British self-delusion follow Brexit plan - John J. Xenakis - 01-18-2017 *** 19-Jan-17 World View -- European anger and British self-delusion follow Brexit plan speech This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Brexit becomes more real after Theresa May's speech **** Theresa May Britain's prime minister Theresa May gave a speech on Tuesday outlining her plans for how Britain will leave the European Union, following the Brexit referendum of June 23 of last year. The speech did not provide much hard information that wasn't already known, but the speech was important nonetheless because it made the Brexit concept a lot more real. Some of the major parts of the plan are as follows:
Although May laid out her Brexit plans for the first time, she didn't really provide any details beyond what was already known. For example, she wants to allow travel between Ireland and Northern Ireland. How is that possible, if Ireland is in the EU, while Northern Ireland is not? UK Government - speech transcript and Telegraph (London) **** **** European anger versus British self-delusion **** The combination of two of the items, trade and immigration, are the most explosive. They're also the one causing the most fury in the EU, and the ones about which the UK is most self-delusional. Today, as part of the EU, the UK freely trades with the EU countries, with goods flowing freely in both directions. That's one of the EU's "four freedoms": freedom of movement for people, goods, capital and services. Mrs. May and a number of other UK leaders seem to believe that the EU will be so anxious to continue trade relations with the UK, they'll be willing to agree to a trade agreement that would be as good as the one if the UK were still part of the EU Single Market, but without all the obligations of EU membership, such as freedom of movement for people. This attitude infuriates many EU leaders. That's not surprising because they've been furious with Britain ever the results of the June 23 Brexit referendum were announced, particularly because the Brexit referendum has stirred anti-immigration sentiment across the EU, and given rise to populist anti-EU politicians. May addressed this sentiment in her speech as follows: > [indent]<QUOTE>"So I believe the framework I have outlined today is > in Britain’s interests. It is in Europe’s interests. And it is in > the interests of the wider world. > > But I must be clear. Britain wants to remain a good friend and > neighbor to Europe. Yet I know there are some voices calling for > a punitive deal that punishes Britain and discourages other > countries from taking the same path. > > That would be an act of calamitous self-harm for the countries of > Europe. And it would not be the act of a friend. Britain would not > – indeed we could not – accept such an approach. And while I am > confident that this scenario need never arise – while I am sure a > positive agreement can be reached – I am equally clear that no > deal for Britain is better than a bad deal for > Britain."<END QUOTE>[/indent] Joseph Muscat, the prime minister of EU member nation Malta, said that "European rules and institutions cannot be compromised," and added: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We want a fair deal for the UK but that deal > necessarily needs to be inferior to membership. This should not > come as a surprise to anyone — indeed thinking it can be otherwise > would be a detachment from reality."<END QUOTE>[/indent] So you have anger on one side, and "detachment from reality" on the other side. May has not yet "invoked Article 50," which would launch two years of negotiations between Britain and the EU over the terms of the separation. She has promised to do that by the end of March, but there's also a pending court case, to be decided in next week, where a decision might take away May's power to invoke Article 50 without a vote from the Parliament. and Reuters and The Sun (London) Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Britain, Theresa May, Brexit, European Union, European Court of Justice, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Joseph Muscat, Malta Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 20-Jan-17 World View -- Senegal's troops enter The Gambia to force the ruler to step - John J. Xenakis - 01-19-2017 *** 20-Jan-17 World View -- Senegal's troops enter The Gambia to force the ruler to step down This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** Senegal's troops enter The Gambia to force the ruler to step down **** Supporters of president-elect Adama Barrow celebrate his inauguration at Gambia's embassy in Dakar, Senegal on Thursday (Reuters) The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), with Senegal in the lead, sent a military force into The Gambia on Thursday to begin traveling to the capital city Banjul, in order to force the long-time dictator Yahya Jammeh to step down, having lost the last election in December. Nigeria has sent aircraft and troops to Senegal, and deployed a warship. Jammeh has been dictator since a 1994 coup, but with his election loss, his mandate ends on Thursday, January 19. If Jammeh steps down without bloodshed, then he will be permitted to go into exile in the country of his choice. On the same day, the winner of December's election, Adama Barrow, was sworn in as president at Gambia's embassy in Dakar, the capital city of Senegal. That makes Barrow the legitimate leader of The Gambia, with the international authority to approve the ECOWAS military force. The United Nations Security Council immediately approved the ECOWAS military action. Analysts are mixed in their assessments of whether the military action will succeed. Jammeh is becoming increasingly isolated, in that many people in his government have resigned, and some army soldiers have indicated that they will not defend Jammeh. However, there are still some soldiers that are loyal to Jammeh, and a battle with Senegalese soldiers could go either way. As of this writing on Thursday evening ET (Friday morning in The Gambia), ECOWAS announced that it was halting its military operation in order to permit weekend negotiations for a mediated settlement. ECOWAS will send a team led by Guinea's president, Alpha Conde, and including the presidents of Liberia and Mauritania to Banjul on Friday. Reuters and BBC and AP Related Articles
**** **** Why you have to say 'The Gambia', rather than just 'Gambia' **** There are two reasons why "The Gambia" has "The" in front of its name:
Other geographic locations that demand the definite article are The Bahamas and The Hague. And let's not forget the immortal words of Ogden Nash who, in 1931, said "The Bronx? No thonx." Later in life, as an "older and wiser man," he apologized and wrote, "The Bronx? God bless them." Africa News and NAIJ (Nigeria) and Blogden Nash KEYS: Generational Dynamics, The Gambia, Banjul, Yahya Jammeh, Adama Barrow, Senegal, Dakar, Nigeria, Economic Community of West African States, ECOWAS, The Bahamas, The Hague, The Bronx, Ogden Nash Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe 21-Jan-17 World View -- President Trump's inauguration speech links today's America - John J. Xenakis - 01-20-2017 *** 21-Jan-17 World View -- President Trump's inauguration speech links today's America to the 1930s This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
**** **** President Trump's inauguration speech links today's America to the 1930s **** Friday's inauguration in Washington After the end of World War II, world leaders decided that the root causes of the war were nationalism and xenophobia in the 1930s, as I've been writing about for years, as well as American isolationism. President Donald J. Trump's inauguration speech combined strong nationalism and isolationism with just a tiny smidgen of xenophobia, much less of the latter than we've heard from him in the past. It seemed to me that he struck the right balance, but even so, his speech was a return to the mood of the 1930s. His appeal to nationalism and isolationism was at its strongest when he firmly declared that "it's going to be only America first, America first." All of these themes can be identified from the following excerpts: > [indent]<QUOTE>"We assembled here today are issuing a new decree to > be heard in every city, in every foreign capital, and in every > hall of power. From this day forward, a new vision will govern our > land. From this day forward, it's going to be only America first, > America first. > > Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign > affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American > families. We must protect our borders from the ravages of other > countries making our products, stealing our companies and > destroying our jobs. ... > > We will seek friendship and goodwill with the nations of the > world, but we do so with the understanding that it is the right of > all nations to put their own interests first. We do not seek to > impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an > example. We will shine for everyone to follow."<END QUOTE>[/indent] The invocation of nationalism and isolationism was not the only link in Trump's speech to 1930s America. His description of today's America could have come right out of a history book describing the Great Depression: > [indent]<QUOTE>"At the center of this movement is a crucial > conviction, that a nation exists to serve its citizens. Americans > want great schools for their children, safe neighborhoods for > their families, and good jobs for themselves. These are just and > reasonable demands of righteous people and a righteous public. > > But for too many of our citizens, a different reality exists: > mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; > rusted out factories scattered like tombstones across the > landscape of our nation; an education system flush with cash, but > which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all > knowledge; and the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have > stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized > potential. > > This American carnage stops right here and stops right > now."<END QUOTE>[/indent] MSNBC's Chris Matthews made the truly idiotic statement that Trump's inauguration speech was "Hitlerian." Actually, it was much more "Rooseveltian," because it describes a national mood today that's very similar to the national mood in the 1930s -- not Germany's mood, but America's mood. Perhaps, in drafting this speech, Trump was influenced by his chief strategist Steve Bannon, who is very knowledgeable about Generational Dynamics and about history in general. But however it came about, Trump's view of America today is remarkably similar to the Generational Dynamics view of America that I've been writing about for years. And Generational Dynamics predicts that the world his headed for a Clash of Civilizations world war, pitting China and its allies against America and its allies. This is what America and the Trump administration should be preparing for. Washington Post and The Hill Related Articles
**** **** The Gambia's leader steps down, after his army chief deserts him **** There was a lot of talk on Friday comparing the United States to the Gambia. America has had orderly transitions of power every four years since 1792, even during the American Civil War -- a remarkable feat possibly unparalleled by any other country in history. By contrast, in many countries in Africa, when a leader comes to power, he refuses to step down, and directs violence and torture to any opposition figures who object. I've written extensively about this in Zimbabwe and Burundi for example, as well as in Syria (not an African country). The Gambia was on exactly the same path, when the dictator Yahya Jammeh, who took power in a 1994 coup, refused to step down after losing the December election for president to businessman Adama Barrow. Jammeh's mandate ended on January 19, and troops from several of The Gambia's neighbors in the ECOWAS confederation (Economic Community of West African States) sent troops into The Gambia and threatened to force Jammeh to step down. What's remarkable about this situation is the unanimity of international opinion. In any similar situation, some countries would side with Jammeh and others would side with his opponent. But in this case, every country that made any statement at all sided against Jammeh. On Friday, the leaders of Mauritania and Guinea flew into The Gambia's capital city Banjul to convince Jammeh to leave without bloodshed. According to reports, Jammeh refused to give up power until late Friday evening, when his army leader General Ousman Badjie defected, and joined the calls for Jammeh to step down. Late reports indicate that he's agreed, but it's not known what the terms are or where he would be going. Meanwhile, on Friday, President Obama left office and President Trump entered that office. No threatening troops from any foreign country were required for that change to occur. Vanguard (Nigeria) and BBC Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Donald Trump, The Gambia, Banjul, Yahya Jammeh, Ousman Badjie, Adama Barrow, Senegal, Dakar, Nigeria, Economic Community of West African States, ECOWAS Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal John J. Xenakis 100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617-864-0010 E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe |