Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory
When the Silent dominated the Senate - Printable Version

+- Generational Theory Forum: The Fourth Turning Forum: A message board discussing generations and the Strauss Howe generational theory (http://generational-theory.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Fourth Turning Forums (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: History Forum (http://generational-theory.com/forum/forum-18.html)
+--- Thread: When the Silent dominated the Senate (/thread-792.html)



When the Silent dominated the Senate - GeekyCynic - 05-19-2017

Anita Hill hearing in 1991 when the Silent had a peak majority in the Senate (65 out of 100). I wonder how a hearing like this would go now with a Boomer-dominated Senate. I'm guessing a lot less collegial and more openly combative. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc7KSINLF5U


RE: When the Silent dominated the Senate - Odin - 05-20-2017

(05-19-2017, 09:32 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote:
(05-19-2017, 03:14 PM)GeekyCynic Wrote: Anita Hill hearing in 1991 when the Silent had a peak majority in the Senate (65 out of 100). I wonder how a hearing like this would go now with a Boomer-dominated Senate. I'm guessing a lot less collegial and more openly combative. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc7KSINLF5U

Funny you mentioned it.

I was on a business trip in Asia while it was going on.

I was the youngest in the entourage, the lone Xer. The rest were Boomers.

Suffice it to say, the commentary around me was prefiguring Fox News points of view.

I sensed future darkness.

It will be interesting to see what Congress will be like when Millennials dominate it.


RE: When the Silent dominated the Senate - Warren Dew - 05-20-2017

The majority leader is still a silent. When McConnell goes, the filibuster will be eliminated and we'll see true partisanship.


RE: When the Silent dominated the Senate - GeekyCynic - 05-20-2017

(05-20-2017, 04:07 PM)Odin Wrote:
(05-19-2017, 09:32 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote:
(05-19-2017, 03:14 PM)GeekyCynic Wrote: Anita Hill hearing in 1991 when the Silent had a peak majority in the Senate (65 out of 100). I wonder how a hearing like this would go now with a Boomer-dominated Senate. I'm guessing a lot less collegial and more openly combative. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc7KSINLF5U

Funny you mentioned it.

I was on a business trip in Asia while it was going on.

I was the youngest in the entourage, the lone Xer. The rest were Boomers.

Suffice it to say, the commentary around me was prefiguring Fox News points of view.

I sensed future darkness.

It will be interesting to see what Congress will be like when Millennials dominate it.

We'll have to wait until at least the mid 2030s for that. As of now, there are only 4 Millennials in Congress.


RE: When the Silent dominated the Senate - Marypoza - 02-20-2019

(05-20-2017, 04:27 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: The majority leader is still a silent.  When McConnell goes, the filibuster will be eliminated and we'll see true partisanship.

-- Mitch is gone. The Majority Leader is still a Silent


RE: When the Silent dominated the Senate - pbrower2a - 02-21-2019

I am convinced that the hyper-partisan quality of American politics is an imposition from the economic elites in an effort to confuse, divide, and overpower.

I was at a Democratic Party meeting tonight in my county, and our guest was the local State Senator -- a Republican. That took some guts on his part. What did he discuss? Roads, the budget, and schools, things that matter greatly in Michigan. I could agree with him that much of the problem in education is that kids have excessive involvement with electronic entertainments. As is noteworthy he told us that Silicon Valley executives who make their living off supplying electronic gadgets and search engines limit their kids' access to the mind-numbing toys. That includes the Idiot Screen that has been around for about seventy years now. I have known people born about a century ago who had limited formal education but were well aware of news and were surprisingly well-read. I'm guessing that when the educational norm was eighth grade, educators tried to get kids to know as much as they could before they left school for work when 13 or so.

It's not Trump - Trump - Trump forever. Once he is off the political scene we will realize how screwed we have been. A little over half know this now, and when it is three-fifths, the political tendencies that led to Trump will be completely unsustainable. I am tempted to believe that we will start recognizing that character matters, and not only for the proles. The legitimate objective of politics in a democracy is service, and not control of people or economics.

I didn't get to say this, but I would love to give every kid a reader that gets only a few web sites, all undeniably educational (Project Gutenberg is the star, and among others, maybe WebMD, Khan Academy, the Library of Congress, Wikipedia, a dictionary site, and a site connecting to art. Outside links w3ould be disabled.

Bored? Read a little Dostoevsky or Hugo. Or take a look at some Cezanne or Hokusai.


RE: When the Silent dominated the Senate - Eric the Green - 04-11-2019

(04-11-2019, 01:11 PM)Snowflake1996 Wrote:
(05-19-2017, 03:14 PM)GeekyCynic Wrote: Anita Hill hearing in 1991 when the Silent had a peak majority in the Senate (65 out of 100). I wonder how a hearing like this would go now with a Boomer-dominated Senate. I'm guessing a lot less collegial and more openly combativehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc7KSINLF5U

You guessed correctly!

Yes, we already saw this happen a few months ago.