Hillary Clinton is honest and trustworthy

[Kinser79]

(05-21-2016, 08:39 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: One thing that has been pointed out, is that the Secretary of State's office was subject to hacking, but Mrs. Clinton's server was not. Which was really more secure?

Eric, since I already know you're delusional I won't ask that obvious question.

The email server was listed as clintonemail.com.  Now I don't have to be some hacker to think with a domain name like that it may involve the Clintons and it may involve email and therefore would be worth hacking.  Furthermore we have no evidence that the server was not hacked as it appears HRC is doing all in her power to destroy the evidence as we speak.  Therefore considering she was Sec of State, and considering that this is public knowledge it is probable that someone who wished to hack her server probably did.  

The State Department's servers come under attack every day as does the DoD's (the latter receiving a minimum of 100k attacks a day--and the DoD has a pretty good record of stopping hacks in their tracks--btw that is public knowledge so I'm not divulging any of the probably obsolete state secrets I know about).  

And that doesn't even get into the fact that information that would under normal circumstances be classified should be treated as if it were classified, including oral communication, there is no telling what state secrets ended up in the hands of those who don't have the US's interests in mind.

(Never-minding the obvious that being told to HRC herself, in the first place, probably jeopardized national security anyway.)