05-22-2016, 02:45 AM
(05-21-2016, 10:33 PM)radind Wrote:(05-21-2016, 08:39 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: One thing that has been pointed out, is that the Secretary of State's office was subject to hacking, but Mrs. Clinton's server was not. Which was really more secure?
That is not the question if TS/SAP info was improperly handled. That is just a diversion from the investigation of proper or improper handling of highly classified info.
Wait for the FBI.
I don't want to be that guy, but the FBI is just as political as any other governmental entity. Even if the FBI finds sufficient reason to bring criminal charges to Federal Court the AG will contest it. The only way to bring her to justice is to get Daddy elected. His AG is likely to bring criminal charges as the existence of a cover up indicates shenanigans happened.
Makes me wonder if no one ever told Shillary: It isn't the original scandal that gets people in the most trouble - it's the attempted cover-up.
It really is all mathematics.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out ofUN/NATO/WTO/TPP/NAFTA/CAFTA Globalism.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out of