04-18-2017, 12:05 AM
(04-12-2017, 05:10 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:(04-12-2017, 03:56 PM)Galen Wrote:(04-10-2017, 12:25 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote:(04-08-2017, 08:47 PM)Galen Wrote:(04-05-2017, 07:54 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote: Source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/politics/c...index.html
Oh, holy fuck, both political parties have gone off the deep end. So you warmongers, just exactly what do y'all expect to replace Assad? IS, Al Qeada , anarchy? The US should stop this neo-crusade crap and just the hell out of there. Blow-back's a bitch.
I am curious about the deal Trump made with the deep state because this is what the establishment of both major parties have been wanting for years. It could be about a proposed pipeline that Assad has opposed for years.
Mahahaha! We drugged him, made him worship the secret Black Rock in the UN, forced him to do a Knights Templar blood oath, then, for good measure, we threatened to reveal the wee wee tape. Now ... he's our bitch!
I am not saying anything like that but I think anybody looking at US history for the last hundred years would have to admit that there is a collection of financial and political interests that are pretty consistent and wield great power. This is why no matter which party or even who is president seems to matter much. Murray Rothbard used the term power elite to describe the much same thing.
Well, I the term, "Deep State", is the military/intelligence agencies which enact the "power elites'" agendas. Said Deep State is an unelected assemblage of agencies/private contractors/bought off elected officials who wield the power in the name of stuff like Black Rock,Martin Marietta, Boeing, CIA/NSA/DHS, etc. There's $$$ to be made in whatever wars happen. "Humanitarian intervention" is just another trope, man.
You can define the Deep State that way, but overall it simply means career government employees (and contractors) who are long-term and not the recent political appointees.