Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The 4T Generational Constellations - Red v Blue
#15
(09-24-2020, 09:08 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:
(09-24-2020, 01:25 PM)sbarrera Wrote: Can you be more specific, re: "other errors" ? 

I am curious if you have your own version of the red and blue generational constellations.

I'd rather not waste a lot of time on a political argument, and your original post is way too deep in the blue koolaid to answer briefly, so I won't go into specifics.

I don't think there are separate constellations.  You can divide people by Red or Blue, which is merely party labeling, or you can divide them between the outgoing neoliberal regime and the incoming regime, which we don't know the details of yet.

Red Idealists include Gingrich and Trump, and also some younger people like Romney and Baker.  Of these examples, all but Trump are stuck in the neoliberal mindset, though Gingrich might be able to adjust.  Pence is also Idealist, and if Trump is so successful that Pence wins a term in 2024-2028, it remains to be seen whether he will build on Trump's movement toward a nationalist workers' future, or if he'll be the final exponent of neoliberalism.

Blue Idealists include the Clintons, and Sanders and Obama act a lot like Idealists though they are on the edges of the generation at best.  The Clintons are neoliberalism personified.  Sanders and Obama could be exponents of a different future, one where workers are marginalized but neoliberalism is replaced by an oligarchy of economic elites legitimized by votes from the government dependent welfare masses.  Or rather, that's what their vision of socialism will become once it's implemented by Blue Reactives.

Red Reactives are dominant in the active Republican party - almost all Republican Senators of note are Reactives, along with the Republican House leadership.  These are the guys doing the detailed planning to finish the transition of the Republican party into a workers' party - one that champions people who work for a living over people who don't, where the latter includes both people on long term welfare and ridiculously rich owners and investors.

Blue Reactives dominate the ranks of those ridiculously rich owners and investors - Bezos, Pichai, etc.  These are the people who wouldn't mind transitioning from being oligopolists to being oligarchs, and wouldn't mind replacing pesky workers with machines and an expanded welfare vote plantation, at least until they can get rid of democracy entirely.

I'm just not seeing how the Republicans are champions of workers; nationalists I can see, but pro-labor I cannot. They seem to be fighting for the last vestiges of their side of the culture wars - hence the focus on judicial appointments as the main accomplishment of this time. "detailed planning to finish the transition of the Republican party into a workers' party" is new to me; maybe you can give some insights into these details? Share some of that red koolaid with us!  Wink

I do like the idea of the Blue Reactives as the emerging oligarchs of the tech industry, an industry which is almost completely unscathed by the Covid pandemic. Jeff Bezos is the Henry F. Potter of our time, and the whole country is his Potterville.
Steve Barrera

[A]lthough one would like to change today's world back to the spirit of one hundred years or more ago, it cannot be done. Thus it is important to make the best out of every generation. - Hagakure

Saecular Pages
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The 4T Generational Constellations - Red v Blue - by sbarrera - 09-25-2020, 10:39 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  War & Military Turning & Generational Issues JDG 66 5 5,301 03-24-2022, 03:01 PM
Last Post: JDG 66
  Generational Constellation Math For The Current And Next Turning galaxy 8 3,576 11-09-2021, 01:51 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  the generational cycle, progress, and the perception of mass death pbrower2a 0 1,386 03-26-2020, 04:15 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)