Let's make fun of Trump, bash him, etc. while we can!

[Classic-Xer]

(07-30-2016, 02:09 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote:

(07-30-2016, 01:52 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(07-30-2016, 10:04 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: The Cleveland convention crowd did their 'Lock her up!" chant a week ago.  Trump just endorsed that, 'I'm starting to agree'

This is par for the course with his use of language that pushes the spiral of violence.  He doesn't say he wants to rebut what the Democratic speakers are saying, he says he wants to be physically violent with them.  He doesn't say he wants to defeat his opponent in an election, he says he wants to imprison opposing politicians.

Now, I'm not quite one to say Trump is Hitler's long lost clone.  Trump does show a persistent liking for Agricultural Age tyrannic government, with his endorsement of great leaders like Saddam Hussain.  He might be as close to a Cynic Hero restoree politicians as we are apt to find.  Still, not all tyrants or wannabe tyrants are equally bad.  At this point Trump is reality connected enough to state his mind but not to try to act on it.  He hasn't actually punched anybody.  He didn't find any Republican Philadelphia cops and send them into the convention to arrest Hillary.

But I wouldn't want to tempt him by granting him the power to actually do what he says he wants to do.

Lets see, the Democrats are allowed to "hit" Trump for this and that or for whatever they want but Trump is chastised for saying he's going to "hit" them back. Are you into child's play? Do you think child's play is going to resolve issues? Do you really want to do liberal child play with an old school adult? I'll do liberal child's play if you want just for shits and giggles and to see how many emotional twits it drums up. Hell, I played that game all through the Bush years. I played it with Kiff. Where's Kiff? I played it so well that your numbers fell greatly and older posters began dropping out. I "hit" hard and I "hit" where it has the greatest impact and where it really hurts. I expect more from a so-called intelligent adult like yourself. I know who the real bully beaters are and who they tend to support. I also know the name of candidate who represents them. Did you go to a similar high school as me? A larger suburban high school with several social groups? If you did, did you pay much attention to what actually made it work?

Did you watch the conventions at all?  If so, did you pay attention?  It seems not.  'Hit' is Trump's word.  He is the one shifting the discussion from the exchange of ideas and ideals to a tone of not so veiled violence.

Why would I waste my valuable time watching a bunch of Democrats pumping themselves up? I get it, the Democrats still believe that they're the greatest people on Earth and their presence alone entitles them to x amount of support. "Hit" is the word that a group of liberals chose from a context in which it was said. Smart are capable of figuring that out themselves. I used to hate it when a so-called intelligent person would completely ignore the context and exploit one word that I said as if I used it literally. Child's play. I can't stand liberal child's play. Did child's play defeat Bush when times were more serious? Nope. Are times more serious? Yep. Lets see, "hitting" cops for this and that and whatever they want has resulted in several dead cops. Do you think any white progressive dumb fucks ever thought about that? Where do you think white progressives should rank with white Americans who aren't life long Democrats? If your honest and aware of all the negatives said about white people, you would rank yourself at the bottom.