12-30-2016, 02:47 PM
(12-30-2016, 01:09 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:(12-29-2016, 09:38 PM)taramarie Wrote: I do not think that is what he is saying. The way I see it he wants to help people who need it. For me that would qualify people who have certain disabilities, mental and physical, women or men with small children or those who have lost jobs. Just to name a few. Note he says "benefits for those who really NEED them." This I do agree with.I don't think it's a good idea for an older retiree's like Bob to piss off younger private sector taxpayers like Warren. I think its pretty stupid understanding the separation/ the gap that clearly exists between the private sector's (Republican/Libertarian voters) and the public sectors (Democratic/Progressive voters).
If telling the truth is pissing off the deceived, so be it.
Yes, we understand the gap. Calling it private and public sector is better than business and government, because no-one likes "government." "Public sector" means it belongs to the people.
The error is to think that people in the public sector, or who benefit from it, vote for Democrats, and people in the private sector vote for Republicans. That's not true; it's nonsense to assume so. Many people in the private sector realize the benefits to society and themselves of the public sector. They vote Democratic too, if they are smart.