Presidential election, 2016

[Warren Dew]

(01-02-2017, 06:03 PM)David Horn Wrote:

(01-01-2017, 07:46 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:

(01-01-2017, 01:33 PM)David Horn Wrote:

(12-31-2016, 12:14 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:

(12-31-2016, 09:55 AM)David Horn Wrote: Let me try this.  I'm opposed to letting you  have free reign if, in the process, 100 others are hurt.  That's especially the case when you are not in any danger of penury and they are.

In this case, though, no one would have been hurt, if the administration had merely kept the policy of requiring proof of health insurance.  In fact, with Obamacare, they wouldn't even had to require proof of health insurance, since that was verified through tax law.

Instead, they used excessive regulatory enforcement to force people into employee status and take away peoples' control over their own lives, because the progressive ideal is to require everyone to live the way the government thinks they should, rather than the way they personally would prefer.

What insurance were you unable to use as a 'proof of insurance'?

You need to reread what I actually wrote.  I bolded the most relevant parts to simplify it for you.

In other words, you chose to fly naked, and got dinged?  Or am I missing something.

You're missing something.  Maybe I should have said, go back and read what I wrote, slowly enough to comprehend it.