03-02-2018, 04:38 PM
For a bartender to refuse a drink that endangers or a men's store to refuse to stock pink underwear, fine. For Walmart to limit its gun sales is fine. I have trouble, though, if you can't get a weapon at any store, if the corporations try to void a basic right through their own choice. For example, some women have trouble exercising rights to health care of certain types at certain places, and the courts sometimes have to step in to prevent prejudice.
Laws, federal, state or local, make little difference. If a right exists as clearly as the 2nd, any law infringing on the right to keep and bear arms should be unconstitutional. Limitation of rights if the life or rights of another are put at risk is allowed if due process is honored.
It is a matter of rights and law. The will of the majority does not override the rights of the individual. This is basic to our legal system.
Laws, federal, state or local, make little difference. If a right exists as clearly as the 2nd, any law infringing on the right to keep and bear arms should be unconstitutional. Limitation of rights if the life or rights of another are put at risk is allowed if due process is honored.
It is a matter of rights and law. The will of the majority does not override the rights of the individual. This is basic to our legal system.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.