03-11-2018, 07:41 AM
(03-11-2018, 02:03 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: This decision is a year old, but I had forgotten....Which directly conflicts what the US Supreme Court said in establishing a litmus test, saying the courts could only limit civilian use weapons. The courts often rule politically rather than following precedent.
NEWS FEB 22 2017, 10:24 AM ET
Assault Weapons Not Protected by Second Amendment, Federal Appeals Court Rules
by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ass...es-n724106
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland's ban on 45 kinds of assault weapons and its 10-round limit on gun magazines were upheld Tuesday by a federal appeals court in a decision that met with a strongly worded dissent.
In a 10-4 ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said the guns banned under Maryland's law aren't protected by the Second Amendment.
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.