03-11-2018, 01:14 PM
Bob Butler 54
Which directly conflicts what the US Supreme Court said in establishing a litmus test, saying the courts could only limit civilian use weapons. The courts often rule politically rather than following precedent.
So I guess that means I can have a Vulcan cannon.
![[Image: M61_Vulcan.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/M61_Vulcan.jpg)
(03-11-2018, 02:03 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: This decision is a year old, but I had forgotten....
... "Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.
Which directly conflicts what the US Supreme Court said in establishing a litmus test, saying the courts could only limit civilian use weapons. The courts often rule politically rather than following precedent.
So I guess that means I can have a Vulcan cannon.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.