Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 23-Oct-16 World View -- Philippines leader Rodrigo Duterte in comic dance with China

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • Philippines leader Rodrigo Duterte in comic dance with China
  • Duterte's statement generates backlash at home
  • Philippines president Duterte apparently cedes Scarborough Shoal to China

****
**** Philippines leader Rodrigo Duterte in comic dance with China
****


[Image: g161022b.jpg]
Xi Jinping and Rodrigo Duterte meeting in Beijing last week (CNN)

Media headlines in the past couple of days have been saying things
like "Duterte's flip-flop into bed with China is a disaster for the
United States" and "While we watched the debate, the Philippines
aligned with China."

The headlines are referring to the new Philippines president Rodrigo
R. Duterte. He announced a cutoff of relations with the United States
first by calling President Obama the "son of a whore." Then he
visited Beijing, where he was given a red carpet welcome by China's
president Xi Jinping, and made the following announcement to
thunderous applause in the Great Hall of the People:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Your honors, in this venue, I announce my separation
> from the United States. Both in military... not maybe social, but
> economics also, America has lost. I will be dependent on you. ...
>
> I’ve realigned myself in your ideological flow and maybe I will
> also go to Russia to talk to Putin and tell him that there are
> three of us against the world — China, Philippines and Russia.
>
> Americans are loud, sometimes rowdy. Their larynx is not adjusted
> to civility."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

In a world where politicians are constantly making ridiculous
statements, this isn't the most ridiculous recent statement (pretty
much anything from Vladimir Putin is worse), but it's close.

For one thing, the Philippines does $24 billion in annual trade with
the US. For another thing, the Philippines has a mutual defense
treaty with the US which has been in force since 1951 where both
countries pledge to come to each other’s defense in the event of an
armed attack, and Duterte alone does not have the power to abrogate
the treaty, nor would the Philippine people want him to. LA Times and Inquirer (Philippines)

Related Articles

****
**** Duterte's statement generates backlash at home
****


As I've been writing for years, it's a core principle of Generational
Dynamics that even in a dictatorship, major policies and events are
determined by masses of people, entire generations of people, and not
by politicians. Thus, Hitler was not the cause of WW II. What
politicians say or do is irrelevant, except insofar as their actions
reflect the attitudes of the people that they represent, and so
politicians can neither cause nor prevent the great events of history.

And in this case, the will of the people is pretty evident from polls
conducted by Pew Global research: Among the Philippine people, 54%
have a favorable view of China, while 92% have a favorable view of the
United States. A recent survey shows that 55% of Philippines people
have "little trust" in China, while only 11% feel the same about the
United States.

In fact, Philippine senators crossed party lines and warned Duterte to
back down. According to the Senate minority leader:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Any drastic shift in our foreign policy direction
> should be well-thought-out and not simply blurted out. It should
> be a product of deep study and wide discussion. Because of its
> far-reaching implications, it cannot be an announce now, study
> later thing.
>
> Yes, our relations with the United States may not be perfect. But
> a country which has illegally built a great wall of sand in our
> seas is not, and far from, the epitome of a good friend
> either."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Other politicians called him a madman and delusional. Duterte's
spokesman "clarified" Duterte's statement by saying that he just wanted
to "separate the nation from dependence on the U.S. and the West and
rebalance economic and military relations with Asian neighbors" like
China, Japan and South Korea.

The Chinese people are skeptical as well. China's politicians and
media have remained mostly silent about Duterte's comments, but people
on social networks see it as a ploy to get investments and loans from
China. Some likened his “separation” from the United States to a new
social phenomenon in China in which people make use of fake divorces
to get around restrictive regulations in order to obtain a second
housing loan.

So Duterte's announcement present an interesting case study for
Generational Dynamics. China and the Philippines will never be
friends, because their respective populations hate each other. It's
not the politicians who decide policies, but the people. Inquirer (Philippines) and Pew Global - Philippines - China and Pew Global - Philippines - US and International Business Times (Singapore)

****
**** Philippines president Duterte apparently cedes Scarborough Shoal to China
****


In his trip to China last week, Philippines president Rodrigo
R. Duterte may have ceded Scarborough Shoal to China.

In its July 12 ruling on the South China Sea, the United Nations
Permanent Court of Arbitration eviscerated China's claims to the South
China Sea, and said:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"[The Tribunal] FINDS that Scarborough Shoal has been
> a traditional fishing ground for fishermen of many nationalities
> and DECLARES that China has, through the operation of its official
> vessels at Scarborough Shoal from May 2012 onwards, unlawfully
> prevented fishermen from the Philippines from engaging in
> traditional fishing at Scarborough Shoal."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

China has been using its vast military power to build artificial
islands and military bases in the South China Sea both in
international waters and in waters that are part of other countries.
In 2012, China forcibly invaded and annexed Scarborough Shoal, and
used military threats to prevent Philippine fishermen from fishing
there.

So when Duterte went to China to declare "separation" from the United
States, many fishermen hoped that Duterte would regain access to
Scarborough Shoal. But apparently Duterte didn't even try. When he
was asked about it, he said: "We cannot win that ... Even if we get
angry, we'll just be putting on airs. We can't beat China."

Later, Duterte said: "I leave it to them to, it’s one of the things I
said that in the private talks which I cannot, but tingnan natin [let
us see]. Let us see what develops in the days to come."

So Duterte really got nothing except promises. He got promises of
loans and investments, and he apparently got a promise that China
would allow the Philippines to do a little bit of fishing there.

We've seen the US administration concede one thing after another to
Iran for the nuclear deal and to Russia for a farcical ceasefire in
Aleppo Syria. Duterte is doing the same thing with Russia. For those
of you who, like me, wondered for years how it was possible for
Britain to appease Hitler, you're seeing it happen here. This is how
the world works. Defense One and International Business Times (Singapore) and Philippine Star and CNN Philippines

Related Articles

KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Philippines, Rodrigo R. Duterte,
China, Xi Jinping, South China Sea, Scarborough Shoal,
United Nations Permanent Court of Arbitration

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
23-Oct-16 World View -- Philippines leader Rodrigo Duterte in comic dance with China - by John J. Xenakis - 10-22-2016, 09:30 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,823 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,405 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,691 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,279 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,339 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)