Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 27-Jan-17 World View -- China places missiles on Russia's border -- to gain respect and attack America

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • China places missiles on Russia's border -- to gain respect and attack America
  • Centuries-old Russia-China border dispute could lead to another war

****
**** China places missiles on Russia's border -- to gain respect and attack America
****


[Image: g170126b.jpg]
Battery of Chinese DF-41 missiles

China has deployed a brigade of Dongfeng-41 nuclear ICBM
(Intercontinental Ballistic Missile) systems near the Amur River,
which separates China from Russia's Far East. China's Global Times
describes the deployment, and also gives some insight into the what
China's leadership thinks:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Before Trump took power, his team showed a tough
> stance toward China, and in turn, Beijing will ready itself for
> pressures imposed by the new US government. It is logical that
> Beijing attaches particular importance to the Dongfeng-41 as a
> strategic deterrence tool. With China's rise, China's strategic
> risks are growing. China bears the heavy task of safeguarding
> national security. Nuclear deterrence is the foundation of China's
> national security, which must be consolidated with the rising
> strategic risks.
>
> The US has the world's most powerful military strength, including
> the most advanced and powerful nuclear arsenal. But Trump has
> called for a nuclear arms build-up many times. Even Washington
> feels that its naval forces and nuclear strength are lacking, so
> how can China be content with its current nuclear strength when it
> is viewed by the US as its biggest potential opponent?
>
> China's nuclear capability should be so strong that no country
> would dare launch a military showdown with China under any
> circumstance, and such that China can strike back against those
> militarily provoking it. A military clash with the US is the last
> thing China wants, but China's nuclear arsenal must be able to
> deter the US.
>
> The US has not paid enough respect to China's military. Senior US
> officials of the Asia-Pacific command frequently show their
> intention to flex their muscles with arrogance. The Trump team
> also took a flippant attitude toward China's core interests after
> Trump's election win. Enhancing communication and mutual
> understanding is not enough. China must procure a level of
> strategic military strength that will force the US to respect
> it."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

China has had missiles deployed on Russia's borders for decades, but
the deployment of the new DF-41 missiles is causing anxiety in Russia,
who fear that the new missiles are meant for Russian targets.
Russia's state media have been full of articles to reassure the
public. Russian military expert Konstantin Sivkov says that the
missiles could not possibly be targeting China:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"China has deployed inter-continental ballistic
> missiles near Russia with the aim to be able to reach targets in
> the US, Canada and Europe.
>
> This is an inter-continental class missile with an effective
> range of 10,000 to 12000 kms. The missile's dead zone is no less
> than three thousand kms. A large territory of Russia, practically
> the entire Far East and West Siberia are not within the missile's
> reach.
>
> If that were the purpose, the missiles should have been stationed
> deep inside mainland China or on its southern
> border."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

The last statement is somewhat ironic, since apparently two additional
brigades of DF-41 missiles have been deployed, and those brigades are
deep inside mainland China, and presumably could strike much of
Russia. Even the brigade on Russia's northeastern border could still
strike Moscow, which is in the west.

Each DF-41 ICBM can carry ten independently targetable warheads, with
a maximum speed close to 20,000 mph. By deploying an ICBM brigade on
the Amur River, the missiles could attack the US by going over the
North Pole, and could hit any target in the US, while remaining out of
range of the defensive Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
system that the US is deploying in South Korea. The nominal purpose
of the THAAD system, according to the US, is to protect the US from a
North Korean missile launch. However, everyone believes, undoubtedly
correctly, that the bigger purpose of the THAAD system is as a first
line of defense to a Chinese missile attack on the United States, but
the THAAD system could not defend against China's new missile
deployment. Global Times (Beijing) and Sputnik News (Moscow) and Daily Mail (London) and Russia Today and Japan Times

Related Articles

****
**** Centuries-old Russia-China border dispute could lead to another war
****


The Amur River that forms part of the border between China and
Russia's Far East has been the site of wars between the two people for
centuries.

The first conflict began in 1628 when the Russians invaded a territory
inhabited by a Mongol-related ethnic group. The Russians and the
Mongols had already fought many long, bitter wars following the
conquests of Genghis Khan in the 1200s, but that wasn't the motivation
for this invasion. The motivation for the 1628 invasion was fur, gold
and silver.

The most recent war in this region occurred in the 1960s, and
is known as the Damansky Incident. On March 2, 1969,
border units of the Soviet Union and China clashed on Damansky
Island, gaining control of the island.

Militarily, the Damansky Incident was a small operation, but
symbolically and politically it's been extremely important. The
fighting generated worldwide concern, over fears that China and Russia
would escalate the fight into nuclear war. The United States sided
with China in the clash, causing China to have much more favorable
relations with the US. In fact, this incident is thought to be the
trigger that led to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger
successfully developing diplomatic relations with China in 1971.

As regular readers know, Generational Dynamics predicts that
in the approaching Clash of Civilizations world war, Russia
and the United States will be allied against China. I've given
many reasons for this, but the tensions along the Amur River
provide another one.

Russia's Far East is a vast sparsely populated region. Across the
Amur River is heavily populated northeast China. By some estimates,
there are about 5 million illegal Chinese immigrants living in
Russia's Far East, with the number increasing by a million or so each
year. The 1969 border war is well remembered by both sides, so the
new DF-41 missile deployment is stoking strong nationalistic feelings
on both sides.

Since 2012 China has increased spending on infrastructure along the
Amur River border region, to make it easier for Chinese businesses to
operate. This supports the rapid growth of Chinese trade in the
thinly populated Far East and confirms Russian fears that Chinese
businesses and Chinese migrants will take over Russia's Far East
before long.

In 2014, Russia held the massive Vostok military exercises in the Far
East, explaining that the military drills were necessary to prepare
for war with the United States. And yet, the assets deployed during
this exercise were more consistent with preparing for a defense of the
Far East, a region that America would be unlikely to invade if it
wanted to invade Russia at all. The only state actor that against
which such a defense is needed is China. And so it appears that
Russia and China claim that they're each preparing for war with the
United States, but in reality they're preparing for war with each
other. Russia Behind the Headlines (2-Sep-2015) and American University
and Strategy Page and The Diplomat

Related Articles


KEYS: Generational Dynamics, China, Dongfeng-41, Russia, Far East, Amur River,
Konstantin Sivkov, Damansky Incident,
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, THAAD, South Korea

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
27-Jan-17 World View -- China places missiles on Russia's border -- to gain respect - by John J. Xenakis - 01-26-2017, 11:47 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,827 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,409 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,693 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,288 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,341 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)