Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 26-Mar-17 World View -- Iraq halts Mosul operation after US coalition airstrikes kill hundreds of civilians

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • US confirms that US coalition airstrikes on Mosul killed hundreds of civilians on March 17
  • Iraq halts the Mosul operation under international pressure

****
**** US confirms that US coalition airstrikes on Mosul killed hundreds of civilians on March 17
****


[Image: g170325b.jpg]
A boy rides his bike past destroyed cars and houses in a neighborhood recently liberated by Iraqi security forces on the western side of Mosul on March 19, 2017. (AP)

The US Central Command confirmed on Saturday that multiple airstrikes
on March 17 had killed dozens of civilians, while other reports claim
that the number killed was as high as 200. The airstrikes were
launched at targets belonging to the so-called Islamic State (IS or
ISIS or ISIL or Daesh) in western Mosul in Iraq. The United Nations
expressed profound concern, saying it was "stunned by this terrible
loss of life."

The military operation to free Mosul from ISIS is now in its sixth
month. The operation has recaptured the entire eastern side
of Mosul, east of the Tigris River, and about half of the
western side. Iraq's Shia army are leading the operation
on the ground, backed by coalition airstrikes.

Stories have been surfacing in the last few days of the civilian death
from the airstrikes. The US military investigated, revealing that the
coalition had struck fighters and equipment in an area in western
Mosul that matched the reports of civilian casualties. Saturday's
announcement said:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"At the request of the Iraqi Security Forces, the
> Coalition struck ISIS fighters and equipment, March 17, in West
> Mosul at the location corresponding to allegations of civilian
> casualties. ...
>
> The Coalition respects human life, which is why we are assisting
> our Iraqi partner forces in their effort to liberate their lands
> from ISIS brutality.
>
> Our goal has always been for zero civilian casualties, but the
> coalition will not abandon our commitment to our Iraqi partners
> because of ISIS’ inhuman tactics terrorizing civilians, using
> human shields, and fighting from protected sites such as schools,
> hospitals, religious sites and civilian
> neighborhoods."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

The announcement didn't identity which country's aircraft conducted
the airstrikes. Warplanes from Australia, France, Belgium, Britain
and the United States have all been heavily engaged in the Mosul
operation.

According to reports from residents, ISIS is using civilians as human
shields. The tactic is to gather dozens of civilians into a building,
and then take up positions on the roofs, firing at Iraqi soldiers.
When the Iraqi forces request a coalition airstrike targeting the ISIS
fighters, the civilians in the building are vulnerable.

In the case of the March 17 strike, some reports indicate that the
airstrike hit explosions that had been laid in the house by ISIS, and
the explosion collapsed the entire building, trapping or killing the
civilians inside.

The assault on ISIS in western Mosul is only just beginning,
with the worst yet to come. The urban warfare is extremely intense.
According to one Iraqi commando:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"The fighting is at much closer quarters. It was
> street-by-street — now it’s house-by-house. We are often
> literally in the same house, on the roof, and [ISIS] is
> downstairs. Sometimes we drop grenades. If there are civilians,
> families in the homes, we shout to them to take cover inside a
> room."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

There are still some 600,000 civilians believed to remain in ISIS-held
areas. These civilians are essentially trapped. If they remain, then
they may be killed by an airstrike or in the crossfire in the fighting
between the Iraqis and ISIS. ISIS is refusing to allow them to leave,
and any civilians that try to leave can be shot on sight by ISIS.
News.com (Australia) and Reuters

****
**** Iraq halts the Mosul operation under international pressure
****


The civilian death toll in the Mosul operation is being described by
as "a humanitarian catastrophe," and pressure is growing to change
tactics.

Lise Grande, the United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq
issued the usual kind of laughable statement that's always coming out
of the United Nations:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"We are stunned by this terrible loss of life and wish
> to express our deepest condolences to the many families who have
> reportedly been impacted by this tragedy.
>
> Nothing in this conflict is more important than protecting
> civilians. International humanitarian law is clear. Parties to
> the conflict – all parties – are obliged to do everything possible
> to protect civilians.
>
> This means that combatants cannot use people as human shields and
> cannot imperil lives through indiscriminate use of
> firepower."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

We can imagine ISIS leader Abu Omar al-Baghdadi saying, "Oh no! I
didn't know using human shields violated international humanitarian
law. We'll stop doing it immediately!"

However, pressure is also growing from Iraqi politicians and
international activists. The result is that Iraq has ordered the
Mosul operation to be halted immediately, until the situation can be
reassessed. According to an Iraqi Federal Police spokesman on
Saturday:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"The recent high death toll among civilians inside the
> Old City [of Mosul] forced us to halt operations to review our
> plans. It's a time for weighing new offensive plans and
> tactics. No combat operations are to go on.
>
> We need to make sure that taking out [ISIS] from the Old City will
> not cost unwanted high casualties among civilians. We need
> surgical accurate operations to target terrorists without causing
> collateral damage among residents."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

President Donald Trump in January issued an executive order demanding
a new plan to defeat ISIS from his military. The new plan arrived on
his desk in February but has not been detailed in public. Some
activists are suggesting that a change in the rules of engagement
under President Trump is leading to an increase in civilian
casualties. Independent (London) and Rudaw (Kurdistan)

Related Articles

KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Iraq, Mosul, US Central Command,
Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh,
Australia, France, Belgium, Britain
Lise Grande, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
26-Mar-17 World View -- Iraq halts Mosul operation after US coalition airstrikes kill - by John J. Xenakis - 03-25-2017, 10:03 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,800 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,388 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,660 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,219 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,324 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)