05-13-2017, 10:08 AM
(05-08-2017, 08:02 AM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > You have yet to state credible arguments for the following points:
> 1.) That chinese strategic thinking is based on hiding their
> military capabilities. When in fact they have tended to brandish
> and proclaim their capabilities and advances in military
> tech.
That's my point. That instead of hiding their military capabilities
as Sun Tzu and Deng Xiaoping tell them to do, the geopolitical
situation is forcing them to proclaim their capabilities.
(05-08-2017, 08:02 AM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > 2.) That either Debkafile or the Epoch Times are reliable sources
> of information regarding the world strategic scene. In fact those
> two sites along with worldnetdaily are generally regarded as the
> military-intelligence community equivalent of tabloid
> news.
I haven't used Epoch Times as a source since 2006, and then I
described it as a "dissident newspaper."
When I use Debka as a source, unless what they say is supported by
other sources, I say that they sometimes get things wrong.
(05-08-2017, 08:02 AM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > 3.) That a US invasion of North Korea to destroy their missile
> program either carried on our own (with south korea assisting) or
> in coordination with a Chinese invasion from the North; would be a
> bad thing for world peace.
So?
(05-08-2017, 08:02 AM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > 4.) That Trump implementing his campaign promises regarding
> military/diplomatic/strategic policy including a likely repeal of
> PDD-60 (which states that the US would not launch a nuclear first
> strike and only counterattack after an enemy first strike); would
> be a bad thing for world peace.
So?
You're using your usual technique of hallucinating things that I said
and then claiming that your hallucinations are wrong.