06-27-2017, 11:16 PM
*** 28-Jun-17 World View -- As Narendra Modi visits Washington, China threatens India after border clash
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
****
**** China threatens India over military border clash in Sikkim state
****
![[Image: g170627b.jpg]](http://Media.GenerationalDynamics.com/ww2010/g170627b.jpg)
Narendra Modi and Donald Trump hugging during their meeting (AP)
Decades of disputes on the Himalayan border between China's Sikkim
state and China's Tibet province were renewed this month in more than
ten days of confrontations between Chinese and Indian troops.
The confrontation began early in June. China accuses India of sending
border guards to cross into what China calls its "sovereign territory"
in Sikkim, and said that the guards had "obstructed normal activities"
by Chinese forces building roads connecting coal mines.
An article titled "Indian troops’ provocation brings disgrace to
themselves" in China's state media Global Times makes a number of
vitriolic accusations and threats directed at India:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"Chinese and Indian soldiers are locked in a face-off
> at the Sikkim section of the China-India border after Indian
> troops crossed the boundary and entered Chinese territory. ...
>
> It remains unclear whether this flare-up is the fault of low-level
> Indian troops or a tentative strategic move made by the Indian
> government. Whatever the motive, China must stick to its bottom
> line. It must force the Indian troops to retreat to the Indian
> side by all means necessary, and China's road construction mustn't
> be stopped.
>
> India's national confidence has been greatly boosted with its GDP
> rising to fifth in the world. The fact that the US and West are
> willing to woo India to counterbalance China has particularly
> added to Indians' sense of strategic superiority.
>
> Some Indians believe the US and Japan are building a circle to
> contain China, and India has an advantage over China by choosing
> whether to join this circle. Therefore, they can indulge
> themselves on issues including border disputes, while China has no
> choice but to make concessions. ...
>
> China avoids making an issue of border disputes, which has
> indulged India's unruly provocations. This time the Indian side
> needs to be taught the rules.
>
> India cannot afford a showdown with China on border issues. It
> lags far behind China in terms of national strength and the
> so-called strategic support for it from the US is
> superficial. China has no desire to confront India. Maintaining
> friendly ties with New Delhi is Beijing's basic policy. But this
> must be based on mutual respect. It's not time for India to
> display arrogance toward China. India's GDP is only one-quarter of
> China's and its annual defense budget is just one-third. Having a
> friendly relationship and cautiously handling border issues with
> China is its best choice."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
In retaliation, China has blocked the entry of 400 Indians making an
annual pilgrimage to a holy site in Tibet.
Following a policy of downplaying border conflicts, India has been
relatively silent about this month's confrontation. An Indian media
story entitled "India pushes back Chinese Army in Sikkim" says:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"A standoff running into more than 10 days now between
> Indian and Chinese troops has led to tension on the eastern
> frontier. There was also a scuffle as Indian troops pushed back
> their Chinese counterparts who made attempts to enter Indian
> territory at Doka La general area in Sikkim.
>
> Sources said the confrontation began about two weeks ago but a
> flag meeting was called on June 20 after two earlier attempts
> failed.
>
> "The situation is still tense," said a government official.
>
> There are reports of two Indian bunkers also being damaged.
>
> Indian soldiers formed a human chain to stop the Chinese troops,
> sources said."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
There is an ill-defined border some 4,000 km (2,500 miles) between
China and India, of which 220 km fall in Sikkim. There was a major
border war in 1962, and there have numerous minor clashes and
incursions since then, although nothing has been settled.
The destruction of two Indian bunkers is a Chinese military response
to India's continuing buildup of its military infrastructure in the
Himalayas, and the apparent planning of an effective counter-thrust in
the event of a conflict.
Analysts say that China has exhibited greater aggressiveness along the
border since April of this year, when the Dalai Lama visited
a region of northeast India claimed by
China. Global Times (Beijing) and DNA India (New Delhi)
Related Articles
****
**** Trump, meeting Modi in Washington, approves sale of 22 drones to India
****
Some analysts believe that China provoked the military confrontation
in Sikkim because of the planned Tuesday meeting of India's prime
minister Narendra Modi with president Donald Trump in Washington, and
because news stories had signaled greater military cooperation between
India and the US, as well as seeing China as a common challenge.
The major military outcome of the meeting was the Trump
administration's approval of the sale of 22 Guardian maritime drones
to India, worth about $2 billion. India had requested to buy the
drones late last year, but president Barack Obama left the decision to
the new administration. The drones will be unarmed, and will be used
for gathering intelligence over the India Ocean.
It's against American policy to sell an armed drone to a non-Nato
country, India has indicated that it may purchase armed drones from
Israel.
The joint statement following the meeting between Modi and Trump did
not mention China by name, but set out principles that are "central to
peace and stability" in the Indo-Pacific region. These principles
were clearly directed at China, with additional text specifically
directed at North Korea:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"In accordance with the tenets outlined in the U.N.
> Charter, they committed to a set of common principles for the
> region, according to which sovereignty and international law are
> respected and every country can prosper. To this end, the leaders:
>
>
> The leaders strongly condemned continued provocations by the
> Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), emphasizing that its
> destabilizing pursuit of nuclear and ballistic missile programs
> poses a grave threat to regional security and global peace. The
> leaders called on DPRK to strictly abide by its international
> obligations and commitments. The leaders pledged to work together
> to counter the DPRK’s weapons of mass destruction programs,
> including by holding accountable all parties that support these
> programs."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
The items listed above allude to China's invasion and annexation of
the South China, which is a violation of international law, and calls
for freedom of navigation throughout the region.
The third item in the list alludes to China's "One Belt One Road"
(OBOR) project. India has rejected the OBOR project, saying that the
massive infrastructure projects violate India's sovereignty in
Kashmir. The appearance of this item in the joint statement indicates
that the Trump administration agrees with India's objections to the
OBOR project.
Needless to say, these statements have infuriated China. According to
China state media, if the US "cozies up" to India, it could lead to
"catastrophic results," which presumably means a war between India and
China:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"Washington's pursuit of closer ties with New Delhi is
> mainly driven by its strategic need to utilize India as a tool to
> counterbalance China. ...
>
> Washington and New Delhi share anxieties about China's rise. In
> recent years, to ratchet up geopolitical pressure on China, the US
> has cozied up to India. But India is not a US ally like Japan or
> Australia. To assume a role as an outpost country in the US'
> strategy to contain China is not in line with India's
> interests. It could even lead to catastrophic results. If India
> regresses from its non-alignment stance and becomes a pawn for the
> US in countering China, it will be caught up in a strategic
> dilemma and new geopolitical frictions will be triggered in South
> Asia.
>
> In an era when emerging countries have been playing an
> increasingly important role in global affairs, if India, an
> important participant in two non-Western organizations - the
> Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS - can firmly stand
> together with China in striving for more discourse power, it will
> be helpful for New Delhi to realize its big power ambitions.
>
> From the end of the 1950s to the beginning of the 1960s, both the
> Soviet Union and the US wanted to play the India card to check
> China. Then the Kennedy government supported India's Forward
> Policy. But the result wasn't what was expected. India isn't able
> to balance China, which has been proved by history. New Delhi
> should avoid being roped into a geopolitical trap. Despite its
> anxieties over China's rise, maintaining a stable relationship
> with China is of more importance to its security and
> development."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
The sale of drones to India, and the apparent China "containment"
policy of India and the US, are going on at the same time as a
flare-up of border clashes in Sikkim. This is a good time to recall
that there's another border dispute that's becoming critical: The
increasing violence between separatist insurgents and Indian security
forces in Kashmir. These are , are all signs of significantly
worsening tensions between India and China. Defense News and Live Mint (India) and Sputnik News (Moscow) and Global Times (Beijing)
Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, India, Narendra Modi, Himalayas,
Sikkim state, China, Tibet province, Guardian drones,
North Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, DPRK
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
- China threatens India over military border clash in Sikkim state
- Trump, meeting Modi in Washington, approves sale of 22 drones to India
****
**** China threatens India over military border clash in Sikkim state
****
Narendra Modi and Donald Trump hugging during their meeting (AP)
Decades of disputes on the Himalayan border between China's Sikkim
state and China's Tibet province were renewed this month in more than
ten days of confrontations between Chinese and Indian troops.
The confrontation began early in June. China accuses India of sending
border guards to cross into what China calls its "sovereign territory"
in Sikkim, and said that the guards had "obstructed normal activities"
by Chinese forces building roads connecting coal mines.
An article titled "Indian troops’ provocation brings disgrace to
themselves" in China's state media Global Times makes a number of
vitriolic accusations and threats directed at India:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"Chinese and Indian soldiers are locked in a face-off
> at the Sikkim section of the China-India border after Indian
> troops crossed the boundary and entered Chinese territory. ...
>
> It remains unclear whether this flare-up is the fault of low-level
> Indian troops or a tentative strategic move made by the Indian
> government. Whatever the motive, China must stick to its bottom
> line. It must force the Indian troops to retreat to the Indian
> side by all means necessary, and China's road construction mustn't
> be stopped.
>
> India's national confidence has been greatly boosted with its GDP
> rising to fifth in the world. The fact that the US and West are
> willing to woo India to counterbalance China has particularly
> added to Indians' sense of strategic superiority.
>
> Some Indians believe the US and Japan are building a circle to
> contain China, and India has an advantage over China by choosing
> whether to join this circle. Therefore, they can indulge
> themselves on issues including border disputes, while China has no
> choice but to make concessions. ...
>
> China avoids making an issue of border disputes, which has
> indulged India's unruly provocations. This time the Indian side
> needs to be taught the rules.
>
> India cannot afford a showdown with China on border issues. It
> lags far behind China in terms of national strength and the
> so-called strategic support for it from the US is
> superficial. China has no desire to confront India. Maintaining
> friendly ties with New Delhi is Beijing's basic policy. But this
> must be based on mutual respect. It's not time for India to
> display arrogance toward China. India's GDP is only one-quarter of
> China's and its annual defense budget is just one-third. Having a
> friendly relationship and cautiously handling border issues with
> China is its best choice."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
In retaliation, China has blocked the entry of 400 Indians making an
annual pilgrimage to a holy site in Tibet.
Following a policy of downplaying border conflicts, India has been
relatively silent about this month's confrontation. An Indian media
story entitled "India pushes back Chinese Army in Sikkim" says:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"A standoff running into more than 10 days now between
> Indian and Chinese troops has led to tension on the eastern
> frontier. There was also a scuffle as Indian troops pushed back
> their Chinese counterparts who made attempts to enter Indian
> territory at Doka La general area in Sikkim.
>
> Sources said the confrontation began about two weeks ago but a
> flag meeting was called on June 20 after two earlier attempts
> failed.
>
> "The situation is still tense," said a government official.
>
> There are reports of two Indian bunkers also being damaged.
>
> Indian soldiers formed a human chain to stop the Chinese troops,
> sources said."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
There is an ill-defined border some 4,000 km (2,500 miles) between
China and India, of which 220 km fall in Sikkim. There was a major
border war in 1962, and there have numerous minor clashes and
incursions since then, although nothing has been settled.
The destruction of two Indian bunkers is a Chinese military response
to India's continuing buildup of its military infrastructure in the
Himalayas, and the apparent planning of an effective counter-thrust in
the event of a conflict.
Analysts say that China has exhibited greater aggressiveness along the
border since April of this year, when the Dalai Lama visited
a region of northeast India claimed by
China. Global Times (Beijing) and DNA India (New Delhi)
Related Articles
- Dalai Lama to visit region of northeast India claimed by China (03-Apr-2017)
- China punishes Mongolia for Dalai Lama visit during financial crisis (29-Dec-2016)
- China tests new long-range missile in Tibet, near India border (01-Aug-2012)
- 3-Feb-10 News - China objects to Obama's meeting with Dalai Lama (03-Feb-2010)
****
**** Trump, meeting Modi in Washington, approves sale of 22 drones to India
****
Some analysts believe that China provoked the military confrontation
in Sikkim because of the planned Tuesday meeting of India's prime
minister Narendra Modi with president Donald Trump in Washington, and
because news stories had signaled greater military cooperation between
India and the US, as well as seeing China as a common challenge.
The major military outcome of the meeting was the Trump
administration's approval of the sale of 22 Guardian maritime drones
to India, worth about $2 billion. India had requested to buy the
drones late last year, but president Barack Obama left the decision to
the new administration. The drones will be unarmed, and will be used
for gathering intelligence over the India Ocean.
It's against American policy to sell an armed drone to a non-Nato
country, India has indicated that it may purchase armed drones from
Israel.
The joint statement following the meeting between Modi and Trump did
not mention China by name, but set out principles that are "central to
peace and stability" in the Indo-Pacific region. These principles
were clearly directed at China, with additional text specifically
directed at North Korea:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"In accordance with the tenets outlined in the U.N.
> Charter, they committed to a set of common principles for the
> region, according to which sovereignty and international law are
> respected and every country can prosper. To this end, the leaders:
>
>
- reiterate the importance of respecting freedom of
> navigation, overflight, and commerce throughout the region;
>
> - call upon all nations to resolve territorial and maritime
> disputes peacefully and in accordance with international law;
>
> - support bolstering regional economic connectivity through the
> transparent development of infrastructure and the use of
> responsible debt financing practices, while ensuring respect for
> sovereignty and territorial integrity, the rule of law, and the
> environment; and
>
> - call on other nations in the region to adhere to these
> principles. ...
> The leaders strongly condemned continued provocations by the
> Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), emphasizing that its
> destabilizing pursuit of nuclear and ballistic missile programs
> poses a grave threat to regional security and global peace. The
> leaders called on DPRK to strictly abide by its international
> obligations and commitments. The leaders pledged to work together
> to counter the DPRK’s weapons of mass destruction programs,
> including by holding accountable all parties that support these
> programs."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
The items listed above allude to China's invasion and annexation of
the South China, which is a violation of international law, and calls
for freedom of navigation throughout the region.
The third item in the list alludes to China's "One Belt One Road"
(OBOR) project. India has rejected the OBOR project, saying that the
massive infrastructure projects violate India's sovereignty in
Kashmir. The appearance of this item in the joint statement indicates
that the Trump administration agrees with India's objections to the
OBOR project.
Needless to say, these statements have infuriated China. According to
China state media, if the US "cozies up" to India, it could lead to
"catastrophic results," which presumably means a war between India and
China:
> [indent]<QUOTE>"Washington's pursuit of closer ties with New Delhi is
> mainly driven by its strategic need to utilize India as a tool to
> counterbalance China. ...
>
> Washington and New Delhi share anxieties about China's rise. In
> recent years, to ratchet up geopolitical pressure on China, the US
> has cozied up to India. But India is not a US ally like Japan or
> Australia. To assume a role as an outpost country in the US'
> strategy to contain China is not in line with India's
> interests. It could even lead to catastrophic results. If India
> regresses from its non-alignment stance and becomes a pawn for the
> US in countering China, it will be caught up in a strategic
> dilemma and new geopolitical frictions will be triggered in South
> Asia.
>
> In an era when emerging countries have been playing an
> increasingly important role in global affairs, if India, an
> important participant in two non-Western organizations - the
> Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS - can firmly stand
> together with China in striving for more discourse power, it will
> be helpful for New Delhi to realize its big power ambitions.
>
> From the end of the 1950s to the beginning of the 1960s, both the
> Soviet Union and the US wanted to play the India card to check
> China. Then the Kennedy government supported India's Forward
> Policy. But the result wasn't what was expected. India isn't able
> to balance China, which has been proved by history. New Delhi
> should avoid being roped into a geopolitical trap. Despite its
> anxieties over China's rise, maintaining a stable relationship
> with China is of more importance to its security and
> development."<END QUOTE>[/indent]
The sale of drones to India, and the apparent China "containment"
policy of India and the US, are going on at the same time as a
flare-up of border clashes in Sikkim. This is a good time to recall
that there's another border dispute that's becoming critical: The
increasing violence between separatist insurgents and Indian security
forces in Kashmir. These are , are all signs of significantly
worsening tensions between India and China. Defense News and Live Mint (India) and Sputnik News (Moscow) and Global Times (Beijing)
Related Articles
- India's 'Operation All-Out' brings Kashmir closer to all-out war (24-Jun-2017)
- India and Singapore launch major naval exercises in South China Sea (25-May-2017)
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, India, Narendra Modi, Himalayas,
Sikkim state, China, Tibet province, Guardian drones,
North Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, DPRK
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
