Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 2-Jul-17 World View -- Fed Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen says 'no financial crisis in our lifetimes'

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • Fed Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen says 'no financial crisis in our lifetimes'
  • Examining the stock market bubble
  • Remembering Alan Greenspan as Fed Chairman
  • Remembering Ben Bernanke as Fed Chairman

****
**** Fed Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen says 'no financial crisis in our lifetimes'
****


[Image: g170701b.jpg]
Fed Chairman Janet Yellen

Janet Yellen, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, the successor
to Ben Bernanke and Alan Greenspan, held a press conference on Tuesday
of last week, during which she said that she believes that there will
be no new financial crisis "in our lifetimes":

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Would I say there will never, ever be another
> financial crisis?
>
> You know probably that would be going too far but I do think we're
> much safer and I hope that it will not be in our lifetimes and I
> don't believe it will be."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Yellen said that the reason she believes that there won't be a
financial crisis "in our lifetimes" is because the Fed is much more
clever and vigilant now about detecting risks, having learned lessons
from the last financial crisis:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"I think the system is much safer and much sounder.
> We are doing a lot more to try to look for financial stability
> risks that may not be immediately apparent but to look in corners
> of the financial system that are not subject to regulation,
> outside those areas in order to try to detect threats to financial
> stability that may be emerging.
>
> After the financial crisis, those who see the damage in that type
> of thinking have played a major role in ensuring that we have a
> more appropriate system of supervision and regulation, hopefully
> for a good long time."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

This is such a bizarre, naïve statement, that it's hard to know what
to make of it. Yellen is expressing precisely the attitude that's
always been prevalent prior to every financial crisis in world
history. Politicians say "This time it's different," and "We've
learned our lessons," and "It can't happen this time." And it doesn't
happen this time, until it does.

Actually, the lessons from the last financial crisis haven't been
learned at all. The Fed and central banks around the world have been
"printing" hundreds of trillions of dollars, and governments around
the world have been borrowing that money and going into new debt at an
exponentially increasing rate. We've recently been reporting that
it's too late for Illinois and Puerto Rico,
which have gone into so much debt there's literally no hope
of every paying it off.

This is true all around the world. According to a new report by the
Institute of International Finance, global debt has reached $217
trillion in the first quarter of this year, and that's 327% of gross
domestic product for the whole world.

China in particular poses an enormous risk. China's total debt
surpassed 304% of GDP as of May 2017, according to the IIF.

Janet Yellen apparently believes that all this is no problem, that if
a problem does arise, then the Fed or some other central bank can just
print another trillion dollars in free money and use it to patch up
the problem. So we have nothing to worry about.

Reuters and CNBC and CNBC

Related Articles

****
**** Examining the stock market bubble
****


I started paying attention to the Fed in 2002, after seeing a huge
graph of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) from 1920 to the
present in the Boston Globe. I took one look at the graph and could
see that it was perfectly obvious that we were in a stock market
bubble. Later, of course, I did the calculations and verified it.

There are many reasons why I believe that mainstream economists are
airheads, and one of them is the belief that you can't detect a bubble
until after it occurs. In the case of the DJIA, it's rather simple.
If you analyze historical values of the DJIA, you find that in the 90-year period from 1904 to 1994 it grew
at an average of 4.5% per year, including inflation. So since the
DJIA started growing much more rapidly than 4.5% per year, starting in
1995, the you know that it's in a growing bubble. Today, the DJIA is
at 258% of its long-term trend value, as determined by the 4.5% growth
rate, so we can be sure that the DJIA is in an enormous bubble. In
fact, it was at 255% of the trend value when the crash began in 1929,
and fell to only 24% of the trend value by 1932, after several years
of crashing.

Another thing that mainstream economists are incapable of grasping is
the concept of "Reversion of the Mean." This means that the average
(or mean) of a value must be the same in the future as it was in the
past.

This is easiest to explain with the S&P 500 Price Earnings ratio (p/e
ratio). The historic average value of the p/e ratio is 14, but since
the 1990s, it's been well above the average, and today it's around 24.

Now, airhead economists use the erroneous phrase "Reversion TO the
Mean," and they say you should be prepared for the p/e ratio to revert
to its mean value of 14. This would be a significant stock market
correction, but it's only a small part of the story.

If the p/e ratio only reverts to 14, then that means for the last 20
years, the average (or mean) value was well above 14. That doesn't
satisfy the requirement that the average before 1995 was 14, and so
after 1995 it also has to be 14. That's why we say "Reversion OF the
Mean," which says that the average value must return to 14, which
means that the p/e ratio would have to fall to around 5 for 20 years,
just as it was well above 14 for the last 20 years. This portends
major stock market crash.

The members of the Federal Reserve are some of the major economists of
our time, each with huge staffs to do research. And yet, Janet Yellen
says that the Fed has everything under control, and there won't be a
financial crisis "in our lifetimes." It's just absolutely bizarre.

Related Articles

****
**** Remembering Alan Greenspan as Fed Chairman
****


The bizarre statement by current Fed Chairman Janet Yellen is inciting
feelings of nostalgia in me to remember the days of her predecessors.
Since I started writing Generational Dynamics analyses in 2003, there
have been two prior Fed chairmen, Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke.
Let's start with Greenspan.

Another reason why I consider mainstream economists, or at least
mainstream economics journalists and analysts, to be airheads is
because of how they covered the Alan Greenspan years at the Fed.
Throughout the early 2000s, they would make a "Greenspeak" or "Fed
speak" joke that when Greenspan gave a speech or statement he could
not be understood because he used convoluted language. So the
so-called economics experts would say that they simply couldn't
understand what Greenspan was saying. That whole excuse was totally
ridiculous. I didn't understand what he was saying all the time
either, but then I would go to the Federal Reserve web site and read
the transcript of his speech. After reading it three or four times,
even the convoluted language made sense. So I formed the opinion that
any economics journalist or economist who said that he couldn't
understand Greenspan because of convoluted language was an airhead --
and there were a lot of people like that.

So I was carefully following Greenspan during 2003, 2004, and 2005 to
see what he thought of the growing stock market and housing bubbles.
All my articles are on my web site, but to summarize: Early in 2004,
he said there were no bubbles. In August 2004, he said that there was
a housing bubble, but that it was a good thing, because homeowners
could mortgage their homes, borrowing money on their homes, and have
extra money to spend. In November 2004, he had a front-page interview
with the Wall Street Journal admitting that he had known since 1996
that there was a stock market bubble, but decided to ignore it, and
deal with it when it began to grow. Early in 2005, he completely
reversed himself, and repudiated his earlier reasoning, saying that
the bubble was growing. By the end of 2005, and his tenure as Fed
president, Greenspan was saying that high asset prices were becoming very dangerous, and that " history has not dealt kindly with the
aftermath of protracted periods of low risk premiums."

My web site was pretty much the only place in the world where you
could read this description of Greenspan's change of mind, as it was
going on. You'd think it would be big news when Greenspan repudiated
his own reasoning early in 2005, but there was not a word in the
mainstream media, apparently because the airheads at the Wall Street
Journal and CNBC were too dumb to understand his "convoluted
language."

The other amazing thing is that Greenspan himself is apparently too
embarrassed to admit that he predicted the housing bubble. He clearly
discussed it in his speeches in 2005-5, but never referred to those
speeches later. Apparently he was afraid that if he admitted that he
knew what was going on, then he'd be blamed for it.

To me, Greenspan's story is one of the most amazing of the 2000s
decade.

Related Articles

****
**** Remembering Ben Bernanke as Fed Chairman
****


Alan Greenspan was born in 1926, and lived through the Great
Depression, so when he became alarmed in 2005, it must have been
because he recognized all the signs of impending disaster from his
childhood.

Ben S. Bernanke was born in 1953 and grew up during the 1950s, when
America had already defeated the Great Depression and defeated the
Nazis, and no goal was out of reach. He was in college in the 1970s
when high inflation was the major problem, so naturally inflation was
his greatest concern as Fed Chairman.

As I described in my 2005 article, "Ben S. Bernanke: The man without agony", Bernanke was a
complete contrast to Greenspan. Bernanke didn't believe in bubbles.
He believed that the 1930s Great Depression was CAUSED by the Fed --
which could have poured some money into the economy and prevented the
Great Depression completely.

Ben Bernanke's story is not yet completely over. In 2008, during the
financial crisis, his policy was to "print" as much money as he
thought necessary, and pour it into the banking system. He did that,
and central banks around the world followed him and did the same.

That's why global debt has reached $217 trillion in the first quarter
of this year, and that's 327% of gross domestic product for the whole
world. The current Fed chairman Janet Yellen says that the Fed has
this all figured out. If some segment of the world economy starts
crashing, threatening a chain reaction that will cause a catastrophic
global financial crisis, Yellen and the other central bankers will
just print money and stop the chain reaction. So we have nothing to
worry about.

Related Articles

KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen,
Alan Greenspan, Ben S. Bernanke, Greenspeak, Great Depression,
Dow Jones Industrial Average, Reversion of the Mean,
Price/earnings ratio

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
2-Jul-17 World View -- Fed Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen says 'no financial crisis in - by John J. Xenakis - 07-01-2017, 09:32 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,798 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,386 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,659 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,217 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,322 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)