Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 5-Aug-17 World View -- China further escalates the rhetoric threatening India over Doklam Plateau

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • China further escalates the rhetoric threatening India over Doklam Plateau
  • China attempts to justify its claim to the Doklam Plateau

****
**** China further escalates the rhetoric threatening India over Doklam Plateau
****


[Image: g170804b.jpg]
India's prime minister Narendra Modi and China's president Xi Jinping at a meeting last year (AP)

The border dispute involving China, India and Bhutan over the Doklam
Plateau seems far from resolution. As we've been reporting
a standoff between India's army and China's
army on Doklam plateau in the tiny country of Bhutan. China is
attempting to annex the region, and on June 16 sent Chinese troops and
construction workers to begin road construction. Bhutan troops tried
to prevent the Chinese troop incursion, but they were overrun. India
sent in its own troops, saying that it did so when Bhutan invoked a
treaty with India and asked for help. The result is a standoff,
though no bullets have been fired yet.

China's Foreign Ministry tells the story a little differently:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"On June 16, the Chinese side was building a road in
> the Dong Lang area which is located on the Chinese side of the
> Sikkim Sector of the China-India boundary. This was aimed at
> improving the local transportation and facilitating local
> herdsmen's grazing of livestock and border troops' patrolling. It
> is normal activity of China in its own territory which is
> completely lawful and legitimate."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Unfortunately, it isn't "normal activity," and it isn't China's
territory. It's Bhutan's territory.

To make its point, China's military has carried out live fire
exercises in Tibet, presumably near the Doklam region. A video on
China Central Television (CCTV) showed a commander sitting in a
vehicle shouting “3, 2, 1, fire!” into two telephones and a missile
was launched into the sky. Troops were shown loading and firing other
missiles, some of which landed in fiery explosions.

Probably more significant is that a commentary in China's official
Xinhua news agency said, "China has made it clear that there is no
room for negotiation and the only solution is the unconditional and
immediate withdrawal of Indian troops from the region."

China's state-run Global Times says that China would "annihilate"
Indian forces:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"India is publicly challenging a country that is far
> superior in strength. India's recklessness has shocked
> Chinese. Maybe its regional hegemonism in South Asia and the
> Western media comments have blinded New Delhi into believing that
> it can treat a giant to its north in the way it bullies other
> South Asian countries.
>
> Over the past month, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has been
> on the move. We believe that the PLA has made sufficient
> preparation for military confrontation.
>
> It is a war with an obvious result. The government of Prime
> Minister Narendra Modi should be aware of the PLA's overwhelming
> firepower and logistics. Indian border troops are no rival to PLA
> field forces. If a war spreads, the PLA is perfectly capable of
> annihilating all Indian troops in the border region."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Indian authorities have said in the past that they are prepared
for a military clash with China in Doklam, and that they expect
to win.

India's Ministry of External Affairs is using far more diplomatic
rhetoric than China, but has not shown and inclination to back down.
A spokesman said that India is continuously coordinating with Bhutan
to arrive at a "mutually-acceptable solution" to resolve the Doklam
dispute. He added, "Our objective is to achieve peace and tranquility
through diplomacy." However, it's hard to see how war can be avoided
unless India backs down.

China's president Xi Jinping may be under pressure to resolve the
situation as quickly as possible.

The Communist Party congress is set for November. If the Doklam
standoff continues until them, or if China's military withdraws, then
it would make Xi look weak, and would bolster his rivals.

From the point of view of Generational Dynamics,
xenophobia and nationalism are increasing in countries around the
world, as countries go deeper into a generational Crisis era.
The result is that many countries are becoming more belligerent,
at least in rhetoric.

On the Arabian Gulf, the four Arab countries Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,
United Arab Emirates, and Egypt have implemented a land, sea
and air blockade against Qatar. This has gone on for weeks.

As we reported two days ago,
US
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that China was risking "open
conflict" with the US over its policies in the South China Sea and in
Korea. His remarks were consistent with other statements by President
Donald Trump and Senator Lindsey Graham. They represent a significant
escalation in rhetoric by the US, and a change in policy that's
consistent with a Generational Dynamics analysis.

Another example is North Korea itself, which is exhibiting increased
belligerence through development of ballistic missiles and
nuclear weapons.

China's escalating rhetoric over the Doklam Plateau is consistent with
these other examples, which illustrate how the worldwide increase in
xenophobia and nationalism is pointing in the direction of a new war.
India.com and AP and China's Foreign Ministry and Global Times (Beijing)

****
**** China attempts to justify its claim to the Doklam Plateau
****


On Wednesday, China's Foreign Ministry issued a 15-page document
entitled: "The Facts and China’s Position Concerning the Indian Border
Troops’ Crossing of the China-India Boundary in the Sikkim Sector into
the Chinese Territory."

It goes into detail about an agreement called the "1890 Convention
Between Great Britain and China Relating to Sikkim and Tibet" to
provide proof that the Doklam Plateau really belongs to China, rather
than Bhutan. However, that was a colonial-era agreement between Great
Britain and China. Bhutan was not a party to that agreement.

We always run into the same problem with China. In the South China
Sea, they're building artificial islands and military bases that are
in violation of international law, and they've repeatedly lied to make
their claim to annexing the entire South China Sea. If they've lied
repeatedly about the South China Sea, why would anyone believe
anything they say about the Doklam Plateau or anything else?

Of course it doesn't make any difference whether China is lying or
not. China is a highly militarized state with a "China dream" that is
preparing for many wars. China's Foreign Ministry (PDF) and India Times and International Business Times (India)

Related Articles


KEYS: Generational Dynamics, China, India, Bhutan, Doklam Plateau,
Narendra Modi, Xi Jinping, Rex Tillerson,
Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Qatar

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
5-Aug-17 World View -- China further escalates the rhetoric threatening India over Do - by John J. Xenakis - 08-04-2017, 10:45 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,827 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,409 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,693 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,288 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,341 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)