Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • India reinforces its military in preparation for war
  • Bhutan makes it clear to China that its ally is India
  • SCMP: China and India on brink of war that could spread to the Indian Ocean

****
**** India reinforces its military in preparation for war
****


[Image: g170811b.jpg]
Chinese soldier stands guard on the Chinese side of the border crossing between India and China. (AFP)

India's military have raised the alert level in the region surrounding
the Doklam Plateau, along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) the forms
the border between India and China.

For almost two months, China and India have each had 300 soldiers just
100 meters apart on the plateau, 3,000 meters above sea level. India
is not increasing its troop strength on the plateau itself, but is
bring troops into bases nearby, and is raising the alert level in
preparation for war.

The border dispute involving China, India and Bhutan over the Doklam
Plateau continues to be unresolved, and in fact appears to be
escalating. As we've been reporting
a standoff between India's army and China's army on
Doklam plateau in the tiny country of Bhutan. China is attempting to
annex the region, and on June 16 sent Chinese troops and construction
workers to begin road construction. Bhutan troops tried to prevent
the Chinese troop incursion, but they were overrun. India sent in its
own troops, saying that it did so when Bhutan invoked a treaty with
India and asked for help, resulting in a standoff.

No bullets have been fired yet, but as we recently reported,
China appears to have set an August 19
deadline for India to withdraw its troops from the Doklam Plateau.

Even if August 19 passes with no military action, there's another hard
deadline: The Communist People's Congress in Beijing in November. If
the standoff hasn't been resolved in time for that meeting, it could
be a major humiliation for China's president Xi Jinping.

In addition to setting deadlines, China has been using every possible
form of psychological warfare on India to try to force them to
withdraw their soldiers, and allow the Chinese military to invade and
annex Doklam Plateau. Some of the techniques used by China include
the following:
  • Claim that India has invaded Chinese territory, even though
    India's troops are on the Doklam Plateau, which belongs to
    Bhutan.

  • Warn India to avoid a repeat of their loss in a 1962 border war,
    without mentioning China's loss in a 1967 border war.

  • Warn India that if it doesn't back down, then China will invade
    Jammu and Kashmir.

India has moved its army to a state of "no war, no peace," which is an
alert state where soldiers take up positions that are earmarked for
them in the event of a war. Reuters and Indian Express and India Times and Financial Express and International Business Times (India)

****
**** Bhutan makes it clear to China that its ally is India
****


From the beginning of this crisis, China's media have insisted that
Bhutan and China have no dispute, implying that the two countries
agree that the Doklam Plateau belongs to China, not Bhutan.

Furthermore, China's media have insisted that Bhutan did not want
India's intervention, and that Indian troops had entered the region in
order to gain control of Bhutan.

Bhutan has in fact tried to avoid inflaming the situation, and has
said little, hoping that India and China find a peaceful resolution.

However, on Thursday, the government of Bhutan issued a statement made
its position very clear:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Our position on the border issue of Doklam is very
> clear. Please refer to our statement which has been published on
> the web site of Bhutan's Foreign Ministry on June 29,
> 2017."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

The referenced June 29 statement is as follows:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Press Release June 29, 2017
>
> In view of the many queries raised recently in the media regarding
> the Bhutan – China boundary in the Doklam area the Ministry of
> Foreign Affairs would like to convey the following:
>
> On 16th June 2017, the Chinese Army started constructing a
> motorable road from Dokola in the Doklam area towards the Bhutan
> Army camp at Zompelri. Boundary talks are ongoing between Bhutan
> and China and we have written agreements of 1988 and 1998 stating
> that the two sides agree to maintain peace and tranquility in
> their border areas pending a final settlement on the boundary
> question, and to maintain status quo on the boundary as before
> March 1959. The agreements also state that the two sides will
> refrain from taking unilateral action, or use of force, to change
> the status quo of the boundary.
>
> Bhutan has conveyed to the Chinese side, both on the ground and
> through the diplomatic channel, that the construction of the road
> inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the agreements
> and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between our
> two countries. Bhutan hopes that the status quo in the Doklam area
> will be maintained as before 16 June 2017."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Once again, we have a situation where China's claims are simply lies.
As usual, we have to point out that China has lied repeatedly and
continuously about its claims and criminal activities in the South
China Sea, and so there is no reason to believe any claims they make
about Bhutan's territory on the Doklam Plateau.

As we've said before, China is a highly militarized international
criminal state, but at some point they'll go one step to far, and
bring an enormous catastrophe on themselves and the world. India Times (8-Aug) and Kashmir Monitor and Bhutan Foreign Ministry

****
**** SCMP: China and India on brink of war that could spread to the Indian Ocean
****


Among Chinese media publications, we often quote China Daily and
Global Times. Both are strictly controlled by the Chinese Communist
Party, though Global Times is far more nationalistic.

The Hong-Kong based South China Morning Post (SCMP) is a bit more
independent than the other two. That's not to say that they would
directly confront and contradict Beijing policy -- if they did,
Beijing would probably have the editors abducted, thrown into a pit
and tortured. But they are able to print analyses that are a bit more
balanced than the pure propaganda of the other two.

According to an SCMP analysis, both China and India are preparing for
an armed conflict in the event that negotiations fail.

The article quotes a Chinese military source:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"The PLA [People's Liberation Army] will not seek to
> fight a ground war with Indian troops early on. Instead it will
> deploy aircraft and strategic missiles to paralyse Indian mountain
> divisions stationed in the Himalayas on the border with China.
> [Indian troops will probably hold out for] no more than a
> week."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

Chinese military sources believe that any conflict will be controlled,
and not spill over into other disputed areas, of which there are
currently three along the 2,000 km border.

However, an Indian defense expert, says that a conflict will not be
limited, and could extend into the Indian Ocean.

China is vulnerable in the maritime area, because China is heavily
reliant on imported fuel and, according to figures published by state
media, more than 80 per cent of its oil imports travel via the Indian
Ocean or Strait of Malacca.

Dr Rajeev Ranjan Chaturvedy of the National University of Singapore
says:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"Any Chinese military adventurism will get a fitting
> reply from the Indian military.
>
> Certainly, it will be detrimental for both, but if Beijing
> escalates [the conflict], it will not be limited. Perhaps, it may
> extend to the maritime domain as well.
>
> If China engages in a military offensive against India, New Delhi
> will take all necessary measures ... [and will] respond to Chinese
> actions in its own way. Why only a border war? It could escalate
> to a full-scale India-China war."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

South China Morning Post (Hong Kong)

Related Articles

KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Bhutan, Doklam Plateau, India, China,
Line of Actual Control, LAC, Kashmir,
China Daily, Global Times, South China Morning Post, Hong Kong,
Rajeev Ranjan Chaturvedy

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau - by John J. Xenakis - 08-11-2017, 10:48 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,807 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,394 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,671 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,245 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,332 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)