10-15-2017, 10:12 PM
*** 16-Oct-17 World View -- Bitcoin super-bubble surges through $5,000 and blasts even higher
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
****
**** Bitcoin super-bubble surges through $5,000 and blasts even higher
****
![[Image: g171015b.gif]](http://Media.GenerationalDynamics.com/ww2010/g171015b.gif)
Price of Bitcoin 7/18/2010 to 10/15/2017 (Coindesk.com)
The price of the international currency Bitcoin surged past $5,000 on
Thursday, and reached $5,809 on Sunday, before falling back to
$5,712.97. It started the year at a measly $966, and has risen
meteorically all year, if you don't count the fact that it fell to
$3226.41 on Sept 14 from $4950.72 on Sept 1.
I've been asked by several people recently about my recommendations
for investing in Bitcoin. Investing in Bitcoin is the road to
disaster. I literally cannot think of a worse investment today than
Bitcoin, or the various copycat newcomers, such as Ethereum. Bitcoin
is almost literally a Ponzi scheme backed by nothing but air.
Let's take a look at some other investments.
Suppose you want to buy an apartment building as an investment. You
start by estimating the income -- how much money you'll be paid in
rents. Then you estimate all the expenses -- mortgage payments,
repairs, real estate taxes, and so forth. All of these income and
expense amounts are spread out over time, usually over decades, so you
have to perform "present value" computations for future income and
payments. (If you're interested in the mathematical details, see my
2008 article, "A primer on financial engineering and structured finance")
So when you're finished, you get a number that represents the value of
the apartment building for investment purpose. If the value is, say,
$625,000, then you know that you should spend no more than $625,000
for the apartment building, because that's all it's worth.
Another investment is stock shares. A stock share is backed by the
company that issues the shares, and the company's earnings are
published in annual reports. The higher the earnings, the more the
stock share is worth. This is usually measured by the "price/earnings
ratio," which is the price of a share divided by the annual earnings
per share. Historically, investors expect to earn about 7% return on
investment in stock shares, which means that the P/E ratio should be
around 1/.07, or about 14. Today, the average P/E ratio is 25, so
stocks are way overpriced and in a bubble, as I'll discuss below.
Another investment is tulips. I'm referring here to the historic
"Tulipomania bubble" that occurred in Holland in the 1600s, when the
price of a single Tulip bulb rose to be higher than the price of a
house. The bubble burst in 1637, causing a financial disaster across
Europe.
In the fall of 1636, you could purchase a certificate guaranteeing to
you a tulip bulb of a certain type and weight the following spring,
and you could pay for it with a personal credit note. Edward
Chancellor's 1999 book, Devil Take the Hindmost, a history of
financial speculation tells what happened:
<QUOTE>"By the later stages of the mania, the fusion of the
[i]windhandel with paper credit created a perfect symmetry of
insubstantiality: most transactions were for tulip bulbs that
could never be delivered because they didn't exist and were paid
for with credit notes that could never be honored because the
money wasn't there."<END QUOTE>[/i]
In other words, at the height of the bubble, there was this "perfect
symmetry of insubstantiality": A person would buy a certificate
representing a tulip, and give in return an IOU. The buyer could at
least hope that the certificate represented an actual tulip, just as
the purchaser of an apartment building knows that there is an actual
apartment building somewhere.
But with Bitcoin there's nothing. If you spend money on a Bitcoin,
and you don't get rid of it right away, then you have nothing that
backs it up in any way.
Before proceeding, let me put on my Senior Software Engineer hat. The
"blockchain" technology is what the Bitcoin is based on. This is a
solid technology, and it's a major advance in programming data
structures that goes far beyond currency in leveraging the power of
the internet. The problem with internet transactions in general is
that if you do something online then you have no way of proving what
you did. If you buy a coat online then you may be able to prove
through your bank (a third party) that you paid for it, but you can't
prove that you bought a coat unless the merchant confirms that you
did. That's fine in most cases, but blockchain technology allows you
to make any sort of online transaction and prove that it occurred,
without having to depend on a third party. This applies to such
things as financial transactions, smart contracts, and even voting.
So, whatever the value of Bitcoin is, the underlying technology is
solid.
So now let me take my Senior Software Engineer hat off, and again put
on my Prophet of Doom hat.
There's a concept in Bitcoin technology called a "hard fork."
Technically, it simply means that the blockchain software is being
updated to a new version where transactions might have a different
representation. Ideally, everyone simply uses the new transaction
format. But since the Bitcoin community is mostly a collection of
airheads, it's possible to continue using both the old and new
transaction formats, so that now there are two currencies where there
used to be only one, and so there's the opportunity to create two
bubbles instead of just one.
Bitcoin had a fork in August, and here's how a news story on
Coindesk.com describes it:
<QUOTE>"Yet it seems, investors believe the momentum is
warranted given the results of the last hard fork in August, which
split the network in two, but did so in a way that fairly safely
created a new asset called bitcoin cash.
Distributed to all bitcoin owners at the time of the fork,
investors were suddenly given an equal amount of valuable
cryptocurrency (bitcoin cash has held relatively steady around
$300 per coin, but has traded for as much as $1,000). Far from a
risky proposition, investors see that extra value as just created
out of thin air and delivered to existing investors for
free."<END QUOTE>
Anyone who reads these two paragraphs would have to laugh and think
it's a joke. But not for these airheads. These investors think of a
hard fork as "extra value as just created out of thin air and
delivered to existing investors for free."
So the term "hard fork," which is really an obscure technical term for
a software update, has taken on a magical, bewitching aura as
something that makes free money out of thin air. And there's a new
Bitcoin hard fork coming up soon, and these investors are looking
forward to it, because they're going to get more free money.
By the way, Bitcoin competitor Ethereum is implementing a hard fork
starting yesterday (Sunday), and investors are torn between hoping for
a free money bonanza, and a total disaster.
One more point: The fact that bitcoin uses the internet is both its
strength and its weakness. The internet is ubiquitous, making Bitcoin
a globally universal currency. But in a regional or global crisis, or
a war crisis, the internet is likely to be unavailable, making Bitcoin
worthless. Guardian (London) and Coindesk.com and CNBC
****
**** Stock market continues its huge bubble
****
![[Image: g171015d.gif]](http://Media.GenerationalDynamics.com/ww2010/g171015d.gif)
S&P 500 Price/Earnings ratio at 24.55 on October 13, indicating a huge stock market bubble (WSJ)
Bitcoin isn't the only investment that's in a huge bubble that could
implode at any time. There are $8 trillion globally in in corporate
and government bonds with negative yields, which means that you invest
$1,000, but only get $990 when you sell the bonds. In other words,
you don't earn money by investing -- you pay money to invest. But
people do it anyway, because they perceive these bonds to be safe
havens in which to store their money, and they're willing to pay a
price for that safety.
But low or negative interest rates on bonds means that the prices of
the bonds are astronomically high, so bonds are also in a huge bubble.
If the Fed and other central banks start raising interest rates, which
they say they're going to do, then the values of these bonds could
come crashing down.
Watching CNBC this week, I learned that stock traders are unhappy
because stock market volatility (measured by the VIX) has been
extremely low. Traders love the chaos of high volatility, with stock
prices jumping up and down, because they're good at making timed
trades and making money from them. But with the markets so quiet and
placid, traders are unable to make money.
Therefore, traders are hoping for a geopolitical crisis, like a North
Korea nuclear crisis or a major Mideast war, to increase volatility so
that they can make money.
Many people are crediting the large stock market rise of 19% as a
"Trump rally," but taking credit for a stock market rally is extremely
dangerous, since then you get the blame when the stock market falls.
According to Friday's Wall Street Journal, the S&P 500 Price/Earnings index (stock valuations index)
on Friday morning (October 13) was at an astronomically high 24.55.
This is far above the historical average of 14, indicating that the
stock market bubble is still growing, and could burst at any time.
Generational Dynamics predicts that the P/E ratio will fall to the 5-6
range or lower, which is where it was as recently as 1982, resulting
in a Dow Jones Industrial Average of 3000 or lower.
There's actually been a lot of debate and discussion recently on
whether a stock market crash is coming, much more discussion than I've
heard in the past. One person comes on and talks about price/earnings
ratios or other stock price measures to show that stocks are way
overpriced. Then a kid comes on, who seems barely old enough to
remember the financial crisis of 2008, and says that the American
economy is resilient, and there are no signs of an impending crash,
and no reason for one to occur at this time.
So I like to point out that no one has any idea why a stock market
panic occurred on the particular day October 28, 1928, and why it
didn't occur six months earlier or six months later. Even today,
economists and analysts cannot give a reason why that was the day.
Everyone understands that it had to occur because price/earnings
ratios were astronomically high (as they are today). But whether it
will occur tomorrow, next week, next month or next year is impossible
to predict and, as in 1929, we may not even know why it happened.
AP and Business Insider and Bloomberg
Related Articles
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Bitcoin, Ponzi scheme, Ethereum,
Holland, Tulipomania, blockchain, hard fork, VIX
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
- Bitcoin super-bubble surges through $5,000 and blasts even higher
- Stock market continues its huge bubble
****
**** Bitcoin super-bubble surges through $5,000 and blasts even higher
****
Price of Bitcoin 7/18/2010 to 10/15/2017 (Coindesk.com)
The price of the international currency Bitcoin surged past $5,000 on
Thursday, and reached $5,809 on Sunday, before falling back to
$5,712.97. It started the year at a measly $966, and has risen
meteorically all year, if you don't count the fact that it fell to
$3226.41 on Sept 14 from $4950.72 on Sept 1.
I've been asked by several people recently about my recommendations
for investing in Bitcoin. Investing in Bitcoin is the road to
disaster. I literally cannot think of a worse investment today than
Bitcoin, or the various copycat newcomers, such as Ethereum. Bitcoin
is almost literally a Ponzi scheme backed by nothing but air.
Let's take a look at some other investments.
Suppose you want to buy an apartment building as an investment. You
start by estimating the income -- how much money you'll be paid in
rents. Then you estimate all the expenses -- mortgage payments,
repairs, real estate taxes, and so forth. All of these income and
expense amounts are spread out over time, usually over decades, so you
have to perform "present value" computations for future income and
payments. (If you're interested in the mathematical details, see my
2008 article, "A primer on financial engineering and structured finance")
So when you're finished, you get a number that represents the value of
the apartment building for investment purpose. If the value is, say,
$625,000, then you know that you should spend no more than $625,000
for the apartment building, because that's all it's worth.
Another investment is stock shares. A stock share is backed by the
company that issues the shares, and the company's earnings are
published in annual reports. The higher the earnings, the more the
stock share is worth. This is usually measured by the "price/earnings
ratio," which is the price of a share divided by the annual earnings
per share. Historically, investors expect to earn about 7% return on
investment in stock shares, which means that the P/E ratio should be
around 1/.07, or about 14. Today, the average P/E ratio is 25, so
stocks are way overpriced and in a bubble, as I'll discuss below.
Another investment is tulips. I'm referring here to the historic
"Tulipomania bubble" that occurred in Holland in the 1600s, when the
price of a single Tulip bulb rose to be higher than the price of a
house. The bubble burst in 1637, causing a financial disaster across
Europe.
In the fall of 1636, you could purchase a certificate guaranteeing to
you a tulip bulb of a certain type and weight the following spring,
and you could pay for it with a personal credit note. Edward
Chancellor's 1999 book, Devil Take the Hindmost, a history of
financial speculation tells what happened:
<QUOTE>"By the later stages of the mania, the fusion of the
[i]windhandel with paper credit created a perfect symmetry of
insubstantiality: most transactions were for tulip bulbs that
could never be delivered because they didn't exist and were paid
for with credit notes that could never be honored because the
money wasn't there."<END QUOTE>[/i]
In other words, at the height of the bubble, there was this "perfect
symmetry of insubstantiality": A person would buy a certificate
representing a tulip, and give in return an IOU. The buyer could at
least hope that the certificate represented an actual tulip, just as
the purchaser of an apartment building knows that there is an actual
apartment building somewhere.
But with Bitcoin there's nothing. If you spend money on a Bitcoin,
and you don't get rid of it right away, then you have nothing that
backs it up in any way.
Before proceeding, let me put on my Senior Software Engineer hat. The
"blockchain" technology is what the Bitcoin is based on. This is a
solid technology, and it's a major advance in programming data
structures that goes far beyond currency in leveraging the power of
the internet. The problem with internet transactions in general is
that if you do something online then you have no way of proving what
you did. If you buy a coat online then you may be able to prove
through your bank (a third party) that you paid for it, but you can't
prove that you bought a coat unless the merchant confirms that you
did. That's fine in most cases, but blockchain technology allows you
to make any sort of online transaction and prove that it occurred,
without having to depend on a third party. This applies to such
things as financial transactions, smart contracts, and even voting.
So, whatever the value of Bitcoin is, the underlying technology is
solid.
So now let me take my Senior Software Engineer hat off, and again put
on my Prophet of Doom hat.
There's a concept in Bitcoin technology called a "hard fork."
Technically, it simply means that the blockchain software is being
updated to a new version where transactions might have a different
representation. Ideally, everyone simply uses the new transaction
format. But since the Bitcoin community is mostly a collection of
airheads, it's possible to continue using both the old and new
transaction formats, so that now there are two currencies where there
used to be only one, and so there's the opportunity to create two
bubbles instead of just one.
Bitcoin had a fork in August, and here's how a news story on
Coindesk.com describes it:
<QUOTE>"Yet it seems, investors believe the momentum is
warranted given the results of the last hard fork in August, which
split the network in two, but did so in a way that fairly safely
created a new asset called bitcoin cash.
Distributed to all bitcoin owners at the time of the fork,
investors were suddenly given an equal amount of valuable
cryptocurrency (bitcoin cash has held relatively steady around
$300 per coin, but has traded for as much as $1,000). Far from a
risky proposition, investors see that extra value as just created
out of thin air and delivered to existing investors for
free."<END QUOTE>
Anyone who reads these two paragraphs would have to laugh and think
it's a joke. But not for these airheads. These investors think of a
hard fork as "extra value as just created out of thin air and
delivered to existing investors for free."
So the term "hard fork," which is really an obscure technical term for
a software update, has taken on a magical, bewitching aura as
something that makes free money out of thin air. And there's a new
Bitcoin hard fork coming up soon, and these investors are looking
forward to it, because they're going to get more free money.
By the way, Bitcoin competitor Ethereum is implementing a hard fork
starting yesterday (Sunday), and investors are torn between hoping for
a free money bonanza, and a total disaster.
One more point: The fact that bitcoin uses the internet is both its
strength and its weakness. The internet is ubiquitous, making Bitcoin
a globally universal currency. But in a regional or global crisis, or
a war crisis, the internet is likely to be unavailable, making Bitcoin
worthless. Guardian (London) and Coindesk.com and CNBC
****
**** Stock market continues its huge bubble
****
S&P 500 Price/Earnings ratio at 24.55 on October 13, indicating a huge stock market bubble (WSJ)
Bitcoin isn't the only investment that's in a huge bubble that could
implode at any time. There are $8 trillion globally in in corporate
and government bonds with negative yields, which means that you invest
$1,000, but only get $990 when you sell the bonds. In other words,
you don't earn money by investing -- you pay money to invest. But
people do it anyway, because they perceive these bonds to be safe
havens in which to store their money, and they're willing to pay a
price for that safety.
But low or negative interest rates on bonds means that the prices of
the bonds are astronomically high, so bonds are also in a huge bubble.
If the Fed and other central banks start raising interest rates, which
they say they're going to do, then the values of these bonds could
come crashing down.
Watching CNBC this week, I learned that stock traders are unhappy
because stock market volatility (measured by the VIX) has been
extremely low. Traders love the chaos of high volatility, with stock
prices jumping up and down, because they're good at making timed
trades and making money from them. But with the markets so quiet and
placid, traders are unable to make money.
Therefore, traders are hoping for a geopolitical crisis, like a North
Korea nuclear crisis or a major Mideast war, to increase volatility so
that they can make money.
Many people are crediting the large stock market rise of 19% as a
"Trump rally," but taking credit for a stock market rally is extremely
dangerous, since then you get the blame when the stock market falls.
According to Friday's Wall Street Journal, the S&P 500 Price/Earnings index (stock valuations index)
on Friday morning (October 13) was at an astronomically high 24.55.
This is far above the historical average of 14, indicating that the
stock market bubble is still growing, and could burst at any time.
Generational Dynamics predicts that the P/E ratio will fall to the 5-6
range or lower, which is where it was as recently as 1982, resulting
in a Dow Jones Industrial Average of 3000 or lower.
There's actually been a lot of debate and discussion recently on
whether a stock market crash is coming, much more discussion than I've
heard in the past. One person comes on and talks about price/earnings
ratios or other stock price measures to show that stocks are way
overpriced. Then a kid comes on, who seems barely old enough to
remember the financial crisis of 2008, and says that the American
economy is resilient, and there are no signs of an impending crash,
and no reason for one to occur at this time.
So I like to point out that no one has any idea why a stock market
panic occurred on the particular day October 28, 1928, and why it
didn't occur six months earlier or six months later. Even today,
economists and analysts cannot give a reason why that was the day.
Everyone understands that it had to occur because price/earnings
ratios were astronomically high (as they are today). But whether it
will occur tomorrow, next week, next month or next year is impossible
to predict and, as in 1929, we may not even know why it happened.
AP and Business Insider and Bloomberg
Related Articles
- Fed Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen says 'no financial crisis in our lifetimes' (02-Jul-2017)
- As foreclosures surge, people ask why mortgage lenders were so lax / Tulipomania (28-Mar-2007)
- Champagne corks pop as a 'Trump rally' sends Wall Street stocks parabolic (04-Mar-2017)
- Updating the 'real value' of the stock market (03-Aug-2010)
- A primer on financial engineering and structured finance (23-Jan-2008)
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Bitcoin, Ponzi scheme, Ethereum,
Holland, Tulipomania, blockchain, hard fork, VIX
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
