11-01-2017, 07:28 AM
(10-31-2017, 06:33 PM)rds Wrote: > I didn't know you were cross-posting on Breitbart, not that I
> care. I also didn't know that you had personally worked with
> Bannon. I have to ask, did you introduce Bannon to the idea of
> the turnings? Bannon would seem to be doing more to give them a
> black eye than anyone else alive.
No, it was the other way around. He became familiar with the Fourth
Turning and was personally acquainted with Neil Howe, and then came to
Generational Dynamics when he was working on the movie Generation
Zero.
I've written many times this year that Steve Bannon is an expert on
world and military history, and is also an expert on Generational
Dynamics. Donald Trump's foreign policy has been generally consistent
with Generational Dynamics, which undoubtedly comes from Steve Bannon.
I believe that America's survival in the coming world war depends on
understanding what's going on in the world, and Trump's understanding
of Generational Dynamics analyses through Bannon is a major benefit to
the United States and the world.
** 9-Feb-17 World View -- Mainstream media frets over Steve Bannon, the Fourth Turning, and Donald Trump
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/x...tm#e170209
** 21-Jan-17 World View -- President Trump's inauguration speech links today's America to the 1930s
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/x...tm#e170121
** 7-Jul-17 World View -- Donald Trump's speech in Warsaw Poland evokes the Clash of Civilizations
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/x...tm#e170707
** 30-Sep-17 World View -- Steve Bannon and Henry Kissinger form project to sound alarm on China
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/x...tm#e170930
(10-31-2017, 06:33 PM)rds Wrote: > As for credibility, yes I trust the NYT, Wapo and NBC a lot more
> than Brietbart. It's not that I love them all that much, but I
> don't have to wonder if there is even an iota of truth in any
> particular article. But more power to you if you trust them as a
> source. It'll be pretty funny to find out that Hillary and Bush
> really are both lizard people. I would like to regularly monitor
> a conservative news site, but they're pretty hard to find (for me
> at least) on the free web. I use to read the Economist and WSJ,
> but times have changed and my current finances preclude
> subscriptions at the moment. As for HuffPo, yes I use them for
> headlines, very much the same way I use to use Drudge. I forget
> what got me ticked at Drudge, but I threw in the towel on his
> babble.
You should read the Breitbart National Security page.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/
The Big Government and Big Journalism pages are mostly fatuous
political stuff, but the National Security is really very good -- and
of course that's where my articles are posted. The National
Security page has some political stuff but relatively little, and
instead covers world events pretty well.
(10-31-2017, 06:33 PM)rds Wrote: > As for having a clue, I'm not convinced anyone has a clue about
> anything. There are multiple possible outcomes of this turning.
> Your prediction of the generational war coming is a likely
> scenario. If it happens, I'll congratulate you if I'm around, but
> I'm pretty sure I'll be a radio active cinder in the first
> volley.
I have a clue.
