12-13-2017, 11:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-13-2017, 12:32 PM by Cynic Hero '86.)
(12-13-2017, 11:20 AM)John J. Xenakis Wrote:(12-13-2017, 11:00 AM)Cynic Hero Wrote: > The point of a war is to get the regime to disarm, not take out
> the regime unless we have no choice. We deliberately avoided known
> regime targets (like the emperor and the general staff
> headquarters) when we fought Japan in WW2 and simply targeted the
> enemy war machine. The option I point out is the one least likely
> to lead to all-out world war. The options preferred by the boomers
> (either doing nothing or wage a campaign on conditions of allowing
> China to control the end state of North Korea) are much more
> likely to lead to world war.
The regime will not disarm under any circumstances. They're as insane
as you are.
No, you're incorrect. In the current situation, at the current time,
all options lead to world war.
They would be compelled to do so (disarm) by force (i.e: war).
