Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 30-Jan-18 World View -- NY Times publishes a generational analysis of South Korea

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • NY Times publishes a generational analysis of South Korea
  • North Korea cancels joint cultural event because of 'insulting' media reports
  • Brief generational history of South Korea since World War II

****
**** NY Times publishes a generational analysis of South Korea
****


[Image: g180129b.jpg]
The Korean women's hockey team is planned to include players from both countries (AP)

Mainstream journalists, analysts and economists are generally
incapable of grasping even the simplest generational concepts, so on
the extremely rare occasion when a major publication publishes an
actual generational analysis it's worth noting.

An article in the NY Times by Choe Sang-Hunjan titled "Olympic Dreams
of a United Korea? Many in South Say, ‘No, Thanks’" gives a
generational analysis of South Korea as the Winter Olympics games
approach, and the changing attitudes to reunification of different
South Korean generations.

The article quotes surveys that show a big gap in attitudes between
younger and older South Koreans:
  • Across the population, support for reunification has fallen to
    57.8%, down from 69.3% just four years ago.

  • However, 71.2% of South Koreans in their 20s oppose reunification,
    while more than 47% of those 60 and older said the two Koreas must
    reunify "because they belong to the same nation."

  • A "historic agreement" for the North and the South to form a joint
    women's hockey team has been called an "unprecedented breakthrough"
    in relations between the two countries. However, more than 72% of
    South Korean adults overall, and 82% of those in their 20s and 30s,
    oppose it, with many expressing anger that some South Korean players
    would cede their positions to North Koreans.

  • According to one researcher, "Especially men in their 20s, about
    half of them, consider North Korea an outright enemy. To young South
    Koreans, North Korea is someone they don’t want anything to do
    with."

The article quotes a former South Korean foreign minister: "I am taken
aback. Young people seem to think of North Korea as strangers who
barge into their party bringing with them nothing but empty spoons."

The current left-wing South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, has long
supported unification, driven by his personal desire to see his
birthplace in the North.

According to the article:

<QUOTE>"Key members of Mr. Moon’s presidential office and
governing party are progressives in their 50s, who went to college
in the 1980s. Then, campuses were rife with anti-American
activism, partly driven by resentment over the division of the
Korean Peninsula after World War II. Students defied the
authorities by sending a “unification envoy” to the World Festival
of Youth and Students, alternative games that North Korea held in
Pyongyang in 1989 to counter the previous year’s Summer Olympics
in Seoul.

Progressives in that era believed in a peaceful process of
reunification, built on the expansion of economic and social
exchanges. Today, many of that generation see the North’s nuclear
weapons program as a desperate attempt to protect itself from the
United States and the South, with which it is still technically at
war."<END QUOTE>


These paragraphs need a bit of interpretation. As I'll explain in
detail below, what the article calls 1980s "progressives" are known as
the "386 Generation" of the 1980s -- affluent, highly
pro-Leninist-Marxist and highly anti-American, since they had no
memory of their parents' extreme poverty and destitution, nor of how
an American military intervention saved South Korea from the North in
1950.

However it is true, as the article points out, that the 386er
generation strongly believed that the communist government of North
Korea was superior to Western democracies, and that the South and the
North could be unified peacefully if only the South could adopt that
same kind of government. Events since then, especially "the fiasco of
the 386 generation" (described below), and North Korea's unstoppable
nuclear missile development, have forced the 386ers to abandon those
extreme radical views, and look for opportunities for peaceful
negotiations. The 2018 Winter Olympics games are the best opportunity
so far. NY Times (or Open version)

****
**** North Korea cancels joint cultural event because of 'insulting' media reports
****


On Monday, North Korea abruptly canceled a joint cultural event to be
held on February 4 in the North Korean territory of Mount Kumgang.
The plan had been for skiers from both sides to train in North Korea's
Masikryong Ski Resort.

The North blamed the South Korean media for encouraging “insulting”
public sentiment regarding the North. There were no specifics given,
but South Korea has a free press, and there has been a lot of
criticism of North Korea. There have also been individual protests,
including burning a picture of North Korea's dictator Kim Jong-un,
which would be a capital offense if done in North Korea. However,
it's not known whether those were the problem.

It's suspected that the North is angry about media coverage of North
Korean plans to stage a large military parade in Pyongyang on February
8, just before the start of the Olympics. Some media reports say that
some 50,000 North Korean soldiers will march in the parade, which will
feature the latest in North Korean weapons, including ballistic
missiles. These reports may be the reason why they canceled
the cultural event.

The South Korea's Unification Ministry issued a statement:

<QUOTE>"It is very regrettable that an event agreed by the
South and the North will not be held due to North Korea's
unilateral notification (decision). What has been agreed must be
implemented under the spirit of mutual respect and understanding
as the South and the North have only taken a hard-earned first
step toward improving the South-North relationship."<END QUOTE>


In another development, South Korea's Defense Minister
Song Young-moo said:

<QUOTE>"The North Korean regime will probably be removed from
the map if it uses developed nuclear weapons against South Korea
or the United States.

It's an anachronistic idea that North Korea will use nuclear
weapons for the unification (of the two Koreas)."<END QUOTE>


It's certain that there will continue to be some hostile media
coverage, and it's certain that there will be anti-North protesters
before and during the games. This media coverage will be interpreted
by the North as threatening their new strategy of using the Olympics
to drive a wedge between South Korea and the US. Whether they become
so infuriated that they start canceling other events, or even their
entire participation in the games, remains to be seen. Yonhap News (Seoul) and Reuters and UPI and The Hankyoreh (Seoul) and Yonhap News (Seoul)

****
**** Brief generational history of South Korea since World War II
****


In an article that I wrote in 2007 ( "South Korean politicians are 'euphoric' over North Korea nuclear deal"
), I included a brief generational history
of South Korea. The following is an update.

Korea is one of the oldest nations on earth, with some 4000 years of
history. Here we can only give a brief summary of its extremely
tumultuous history in the 1900s:
  • Japanese occupation. Japan invaded and colonized
    Korea in 1905, and was only expelled when Japan was defeated in World
    War II. Korea's attitude toward Japan remains bitter to this day,
    especially because of the use of
    Korean "comfort women" by the Japanese army during World War II.

  • Korean War. South Korea's last generational crisis war was
    World War II, but the country's Recovery era was delayed because it
    was followed soon after by a non-crisis war ignited by the Communist
    Soviets. Known to us as the Korean War, it became a proxy war between
    United States / United Nations forces in the south versus Russian and
    Korean forces, and eventually Chinese forces as well in the north.
    The fighting ended in a 1953 armistice, but the war never ended, and
    the border between North and South Korea is heavily guarded to this
    day, with both sides having orders to kill on sight. People who lived
    through the Korean War mostly tend to be highly pro-American, and
    value the American forces still in South Korea as protection from
    North Korean forces.

  • April 19 Revolution (1960). The U.S. military ruled S.
    Korea from 1945-48, when the First Republic of South Korea was
    established. Like subsequent governments, this government was
    extremely repressive and used violence against demonstrators and
    jailing of dissidents freely to maintain control. As the country
    entered its generational Awakening era in 1960, student demonstrations
    protested what it claimed was a corrupt election on March 15. This is
    known as the "April Revolution." Police started shooting at
    rock-throwing students. On April 11, a student's body was found on
    the beach. The skull had been penetrated by a tear gas grenade. On
    April 19, students at Korea University began protesting against police
    violence and called for new elections. The massive student
    demonstrations brought down the government, forcing the resignation of
    Rhee Syng-man, and the suicide of the Prime Minister and his
    family.

  • President Park Chung-hee (1961-79) President Park
    dominated South Korea for almost 20 years, through the Second, Third
    and Fourth Republics of South Korea, several constitutional changes,
    and several assassination attempts. Park's detractors refer to his
    oppressive government, while his champions credit him with the
    modernization of South Korea, greatly raising the standard of living,
    and turning it into one of the most powerful economies in the world.
    Park was assassinated on October 26, 1979, by the chief of the Korean
    Central Intelligence Agency; the KCIA had been established by Park
    himself in 1961 in his fight against Communist and North Korean
    infiltration.[/b]

  • 12/12 coup d'état (1979) and Kwangju massacre (1980).
    Following Park's assassination, violence within the government led to
    a coup d'état on December 12, 1979. This aroused massive student
    demonstrations against the government in the city of Kwangju
    (Gwangju) on May 18, 1980. The demonstrations were brutally
    suppressed through a declaration of martial law. Later investigations
    found that hundreds of students were killed, and there were unproved
    allegations of involvement of U.S. forces on behalf of the
    government.

  • "Kwangju generation" defeats "April 19" generation (1987).
    In American terms, this is Generation-X versus the Boomers. But in
    Korea, it was a new, but minor coup d'état. The Kwangju massacre had
    galvanized the college age generation (like America's Generation-X),
    and massive riots beginning on June 10, 1987, forced the previous
    generation's military regime to resign, in favor of new elections,
    leading to the formation of the Sixth Republic of South Korea. This
    generation was affluent, highly pro-Leninist-Marxist and highly
    anti-American, since they had no memory of their parents' extreme
    poverty and destitution, nor of how an American military intervention
    saved South Korea from the North in 1950.

  • The 386 Generation (1990-2008). The generation that we've
    been calling the "Kwangju generation" gave itself a new name in the
    1990s: the "386 Generation" or the "386ers". This name was chosen
    because they were all in their 30s (at that time), they had been
    activists in the 1980s, and they had been born in the 1960s. The name
    "386 Generation" fell out of favor the disastrous failure of the Roh
    Moo-hyun administration, which ended in 2008.

  • Kim Dae-jung and the "Sunshine Policy" (1997). 1997 saw
    the first transfer of the government between parties by peaceful
    means, as Kim Dae-jung won the Presidential election. His policies
    reflected the new-found power of the 386 generation and, in
    particular, brought a fundamental change of policy towards North
    Korea known as the "Sunshine Policy." Kim attempted to reconcile
    with the North, and held a summit meeting with Kim Jong-il, for which
    Kim Dae-jung received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2000.[/b]

  • Roh Moo-hyun and far-left government(2003-2008). Roh
    Moo-hyun, born in 1946, was not strictly a 386er, but he supported
    their policies and was considered one of their own. The 386ers got
    Roh elected President in 2002, and forced a far-left radicalization of
    the government in 2003, with some 20 386ers in high positions of power
    in the government. The administration was strongly pro-unification
    with North Korea, despite the North's nuclear weapons development.
    However, a major financial scandal late in 2006 threw the government
    into a crisis from which it couldn't extricate itself. This was
    described as "the fiasco of the 386 generation," causing the "386"
    name, which had previously evoked strong feelings of pride, to fall
    into disuse.

  • Lee Myung-bak, Park Geun-hye and center-right government
    (2008-2017)
    Just as the 386ers rejected the pro-Western values of
    their parents' generation, the children of the 386ers rejected the
    far-left values of the 386ers. Disillusionment with the Roh
    administration led to a movement to the right by the population, led
    by the younger voters, and an improved relationship with the US and
    West. Lee Myung-bak was elected in 2008, and Park Geun-hye was
    elected in 2013.

  • North Koreans torpedo Cheonan warship and shell Yeonpyeong
    Island (2010)
    South Korean attitudes took a sharp turn to the
    right in 2010. In May, North Korea torpedoed and sank the warship Cheonan,
    killing dozens
    of South Korean crew members, and in November, North Korea killed
    South Korean civilians by shelling Yeonpyeong Island.
    The North Koreans correctly calculated that the
    South would be too politically weak to respond, but these acts of war
    caused a reversal of pro-unification sentiment, and a big increase in
    distrust of North Korea. These acts are a big reason why young South
    Koreans are distrustful of and hostile to North Koreans today.

  • Moon Jae-in and the return of the 386 Generation (2017-)
    Although the phrase "386 Generation" is no longer used, the election
    of Moon Jae-in in May 2017 was the return of a center-left
    administration populated by 386ers. Moon won on a pro-unification
    platform, promising to resolve the North Korean nuclear missile threat
    peacefully through negotiations, and also to develop closer relations
    with China. However, when North Korea made a major new ballistic
    missile launch on July 29, Moon was forced to respond by approving
    further deployment of the American THAAD anti-missile and advanced
    radar systems in South Korea -- something that was bitterly opposed by
    both China and South Korea.

  • North Korea changes strategy as PyeongChang 2018 Olympics
    games approach (2018)
    In anticipation of the Winter Olympics, to
    be held in South Korea from February 9-25, North Korea adopted a major
    change of strategy. North Korea offered to send a team of athletes to
    the South Korea Olympics, in return for postponing the annual US-South
    Korea military drills normally held around the same time. President
    Moon strongly supported this move as an opening for possible future
    reunification. However, the move was widely criticized by South
    Koreans, young Koreans, as a political stunt designed to give the
    North more time to develop nuclear weapons and ballistic
    missiles.

That 2007 article was written in response to conciliatory policy
changes by the George Bush administration, resulting in euphoria on
the part of South Koreans. In that article, I quoted a BBC
correspondent, Charles Scanlon in Seoul, who described the euphoria as
unrealistic:

<QUOTE>"We are seeing something approaching euphoria, from at
least among some members of the South Korean government, in
reaction to this agreement that was signed in Beijing.

The Unification Minister who's responsible for relations with the
North said this could be a turning point in the establishment of
a peace regime on the Korean peninsula.

And certainly the South Koreans do feel to some extent vindicated
by what has been in effect a major change in U.S. policy toward
North Korea.

They've been urging a more conciliatory approach from the very
beginning, and they're certainly very relieved that the Americans
now do seem serious about getting a negotiated settlement with the
North Koreans, and they've softened some of their pressure
tactics.

The president, Roh Moo-hyun, said he's expecting a very easy
implementation of this accord.

I think there we are seeing really wishful thinking on the
President's part, because after all any agreement with the North
Koreans is not going to come easy."<END QUOTE>


I don't know whether the current president Moon Jae-in personally
feels euphoria about the new Winter Olympics détente, but as we've
described, the young generation of South Koreans feel little but
anger. The controversy has sent South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s
overall approval rating below 60% for the first time since he took
office in May last year, dropping more than 6 percentage points in one
week. Korea Times (5-Feb-2008) and Meng News (3-Jun-2014)

Related Articles


KEYS: Generational Dynamics, NY Times, Choe Sang-Hunjan, South Korea, North Korea,
Moon Jae-in, Kim Jong-un, 386 Generation, Mount Kumgang,
Song Young-moo, April 19 Revolution, Park Chung-hee,
Kwangju massacre, Gwangju massacre, Kim Dae-jung, Sunshine Policy,
Roh Moo-hyun, Lee Myung-bak, Park Geun-hye,
Cheonan warship, Yeonpyeong Island,
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, THAAD, Charles Scanlon

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
30-Jan-18 World View -- NY Times publishes a generational analysis of South Korea - by John J. Xenakis - 01-29-2018, 10:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,808 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,395 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,672 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,246 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,333 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)