02-26-2018, 02:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-26-2018, 03:05 PM by Cynic Hero '86.)
(02-26-2018, 02:23 PM)John J. Xenakis Wrote:(02-26-2018, 02:08 PM)Cynic Hero Wrote: > The problem is we're in a 4T crisis era. The Boomer values are
> those of the 3T. Under the pressure of the Crisis era Most of the
> 3T doctrines are usually thrown away in favor of what allows the
> society to win the crisis. The 3T doctrines are therefore
> GUARANTEED to go the road of extinction.
I guess you don't understand the impact of what's going on. That's
not surprising, since when people like you grow older, you get
set in your ways and refuse to recognize the changes that are
going on, so you get swept away before you even know what
happened. Some people make things happen, while other people
say, "What happened?"
You may think that something or other is "GUARANTEED," but that's only
in your own hidebound views. Pivotals are sweeping away those
old-fashioned "guarantees" and adopting a new system of rules and
etiquette for social issues and global policies that are completely
different than your antiquated, archaic and outmoded views.
You'd better learn to change with the times, or you're going to be
washed away with the tide.
Boomers are against implementing political economic and military reform. If the boomer view of not striking is correct we therefore we should continue sanctions which would avoid war with North Korea. Therefore if North Korea knows that there is no chance of the US striking first then there is no danger of a North Korean Attack if the boomer views are correct. But that is not the Correct view; in reality North Korea is building an arsenal to attack the US with nukes or at the very least sell nukes to terrorists and other rogue states. Therefore not striking NK is not a prudent or responsible decision it is an absolutely irresponsible decision. Regard events If boomers refused to strike or lauched a limited conventional cruise missile strike and NK responded with nukes, even if the nukes only targeted bases in the region. Then it would be the "not striking first" crowd that would be discredited. America did not continue listening to Lindbergh's advice after Pearl Harbor and Germany's declaration of war.