Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
(03-23-2018, 04:50 PM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > I Posted this first on Your Forum John but I decided to post this
> here too:

> Nobody is Denying 4T theory. What JohnX refuses to understand is
> that he refuses to acknowledge basic facts of the current world
> order.

> 1.) The US WON the cold war, the Berlin wall fell, the Communist
> bloc LOST the cold war. Also the Communist Bloc was never a true
> Compact entity.

> 2.) The US From 1980 until the recession was generally growing in
> strength relative to its rivals and enemies. The notion that Late
> 1970s America was stronger than 2008 America and even 2018 America
> is nonsense. The US was very weak in the late 1970s, why do you
> think the Iranian hostage Crisis occurred at all, also we had just
> lost the Vietnam war.

> 3.) The Recession has Hurt Europe far worse than the US because of
> Europeans even greater commitment to globalism. Germany Ironically
> initially escaped the effects of the recession but was
> deliberately plunged into systemic Crisis by Merkel's accepting of
> the refugees without the citizens consent.

> 4.) Generally, Globalism is the problem, not the solution.

> 5.) Large-scale conspiracies (involving more than several dozen
> people) are generally an impossibility. There is a reason why only
> Bin Laden, his inner circle and about 5 or 6 of the 19 hijackers
> knew of the full plan for 9/11 (the other hijackers were only told
> that they might be activated in a suicide attack, but no other
> details) the reason is that adding any more people to the plot
> would have exponentially increased the chance of someone spilling
> the beans. This is also why we know that Bin laden was the
> ultimate mastermind of 9/11 and that Saddam did not have WMDs in
> 2003. For Bin laden to have not been the mastermind would mean
> that 9/11 was initiated from Moscow or Beijing. If Saddam Had
> WMDs, why would he NOT have used them on the US troops, also to
> get WMDs out of Iraq meant that 1.) Someone helped Saddam and 2.)
> Saddam would have trusted anyone enough the let them have access
> to his WMDs. That is fundamentally out of character for a man who
> killed anyone who he perceived to be a threat to his power and
> survival. How do large-scale wars begin then?: Wars begin due to
> mass panics/hysteria among a population triggering military
> action.

> 6.) The US and Russia currently have the most advanced militaries
> in the world. China is modernizing but in sheer weight of weaponry
> of both the US and Russia clearly outclasses all other powers. For
> this reason China, Iran and others are developing asymmetric
> military tech. North Korea is NOT a large-scale military power,
> despite their pool of conscripted Manpower. The reason there has
> been no strike is apparently because the administration doesn't
> consider them a serious enough threat. If we do strike, we could
> eliminate their missile program within a matter of hours although
> we would have to fight a large-scale conventional and chemical war
> with them afterwards. The US is countering Chinese and Iranian
> asymmetric Techs and the fact that those nations are trying an
> asymmetric strategy shows how far behind they are militarily
> because that means they are unable to win fighting symmetrically.

> 7.) Asymmetric war means targeting weak points in military kill
> chains. It does not mean avoiding military forces altogether and
> focusing on non-military targets.

> 8.) The Current major Military Powers in strength are as follows:

> 1. US 2. Russia 3. China 4. India 5. Europe

> 9.) The Current Major Economic Powers are: 1. US 2. China 3. Japan
> 4. EU 5. Britain 6. Australia 7. India 8. Brazil 9. Indonesia

> All of the Above are concrete facts that can be looked up simply
> by googling them, JohnX has Mostly denied these facts by implying
> or stating nonsense at times over the past 10 to 15 years such as:

> 1) That Globalism did not cause the recession and is not the
> problem and that globalists are somehow the ones who are trying to
> save the west. (a statement that there is no evidence of)

> 2) That the US lost the cold war and is weaker now than it was in
> the late 1970s (another statement that there is no evidence of, in
> fact the US first undertook a massive buildup under reagan in the
> 1980s, brought down the USSR in 1989-1992, had an economic
> renaissance in the 1990s, waged the war on terror after 9/11/2001
> until 2011 successfully.)

> 3.) That there is no deep state (LOL entrenched interests have no
> interest whatsoever in genuine relations with either Russia or
> China, or in a strike on North Korea or Iran, OR actual military
> spending and industrial spending. Trump tried to campaign on
> changing this but the establishment has put a political gun to his
> head and told him to stick to existing policy or else).

> 4.) That boomers are responsible for american prosperity. (LOL
> boomers poor productivity in the 1970s led employers to begin the
> importation of foreign labor and led to the decline of
> American-owned manufacturing because its inefficiency during the
> time when boomers were the primary workforce. Politically the
> boomers supported carter, One of the worst presidents we've ever
> had, they imposed "Vietnam syndrome" on the military resulting in
> a perception of American weakness leading to 9/11. Boomers
> dismantled NASA, as a result we now rely on Russian and Chinese
> Charity for space missions. Boomers refused to allow government
> spending and took faith in the markets, which is why there has
> been no real recovery from the recession and finally they have
> dismantled the anti-predatory lending regulations, which is why
> the recession occurred in the first place.)

> 5. That China and Russia have networks of Military bases
> practically surrounding the US and other nations. (literally the
> opposite of the Truth, The US has over 5000 military bases
> overall, over 800 of whom are overseas surrounding Russia, China
> and Iran: Russia has a base in Syria and China's base in Djibouti
> and the relay system supporting the base can be easily interdicted
> in a serious war)

> 6.) That Russian capabilities are completely decrepit and rusted
> down. (This was true during most of the 1990s but has since
> changed due to the development of the Topal-M Nuclear missile in
> 1999, the Road Moblile Topal Nuclear Missile in the early to mid
> 2000s, the Yars series nuclear missiles since 2009, the Bulava
> Series nuclear Missiles during the 2010s and now the Maneuverable
> stealth Nuclear Missiles unveiled just a few weeks ago.)

The six "facts" that you attribute to me almost entirely are not my
beliefs and not even recognizable to me. Proves what a complete moron
and liar you are.

(03-23-2018, 04:50 PM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > Nobody is Denying 4T theory.

You've denied it many times. You don't even understand it. You don't
even know the difference between a crisis era and a non-crisis era.
Your brain is a mishmash of nonsense, driven by vitriolic hatred of
Boomers, probably because you hate your father. I'm not your father,
and if I were, then I would disown you.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by John J. Xenakis - 03-24-2018, 01:01 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,807 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,394 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,671 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,245 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,332 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)