Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 14-Jun-18 World View -- After the Kim-Trump summit, US and N. Korea plan denuclearization details

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • Media coverage of Kim-Trump summit is bizarre to the point of lunacy
  • After the summit, North Korea must make the next move
  • President Trump says 'Sleep well tonight!'

****
**** Media coverage of Kim-Trump summit is bizarre to the point of lunacy
****


[Image: g180613b.jpg]
Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump shake hands in Singapore on Tuesday (AP)

The vitriolic hatred between the left and the right began in the
George W Bush administration and has been growing steadily since then
in a worsening trend that shows no sign of leveling off. In the
media, it's been clear for years that journalists in general have no
idea what's going on in the world, and particularly have no idea what
President Donald Trump is doing. For example, one Business Insider
news story, apparently written by someone on Mars, says that the
summit means that henceforth the world will be ruled by Beijing, not
by Washington.

For some reason, everything that Trump says and does makes sense to
me. That doesn't mean he doesn't make mistakes, but it still makes
sense. And that certainly wasn't true of Obama, who never made any
sense to me at all, and the results speak for themselves. I believe
that the reason that everything that Trump does makes sense to me is
because of Steve Bannon, who is an expert on Generational Dynamics,
and who used to be Trump's principal advisor, and is now, according to
some reports, an informal advisor.

Very little of the media coverage of the summit makes any sense since
everyone seems to be completely baffled by Trump, which is why I make
a point of saying that what Trump does makes sense to me. The pundits
on the left make bizarre claims that Kim is making a fool of Trump. I
remember particularly when Trump canceled the summit a couple of weeks
ago, Nancy Pelosi said that Kim was having a "giggle fit" over Trump's
naïveté. This woman is so incredibly stupid, she should be locked up
in order to protect her from herself. But pundits on the right aren't
too much better, since they're equally baffled by Trump, and seem
reduced to expressing hope that everything all works out.

So let's take a look at some of the media coverage of the summit, and
see if we can figure out what's really going on:
  • "Trump is alienating our allies, including Canada's
    prime minister Justin Trudeau."
    Trudeau did something very
    stupid -- he dumped on Trump just as Trump was leaving for the crucial
    Singapore summit, completely undercutting Trump's negotiating
    position. To preserve his negotiating position with Kim, Trump had no
    choice but to come down hard on Trudeau. The message to Kim was:
    Don't dump on Trump, or you'll regret it. Actually, Kim had already
    gotten that message when the North Korean press dumped on Trump, and
    Trump canceled the summit, forcing Kim to make amends.

  • "Trump is lauding Kim, while he's condemning our
    allies."
    Well, if you want to get someone to agree with you in
    a negotiation, then complimenting him for agreeing with you really
    helps. What's interesting about the Singapore meeting is that Kim
    appeared to be looking up to Trump as a paternal father-figure, and
    Trump was playing into that, in order to develop a friendly
    relationship with Kim. One possibility is that Kim is dissatisfied
    with the older staff in North Korea, and is looking at Trump as more
    sensible than they are.

  • "Trump gave Kim an important concession -- meeting with him
    -- and got nothing in return."
    I don't even know what this
    means. This "concession" is worthless unless it leads somewhere. You
    have to meet with someone to negotiate with someone. Furthermore,
    what Kim knows is that the gains from this concession can be lost with
    a single tweet from Trump -- as happened with Trudeau.

  • "Trump gave Kim an important concession -- canceling the war
    games -- and got nothing in return."
    Canceling the war games
    was a very smart move. It's not a concession at all, since the war
    games can be quickly reinstated at any time. It also strengthens
    Trump's negotiating position, because when China says, "Kim gave up
    something, now you have to give up something," Trump can say, "I
    already gave up something -- the war games. Now it's Kim's
    turn."

  • "Trump had no nuclear experts with him at the meeting, and
    risked making a major technical mistake."
    Having an expert
    present at the meeting can be dangerous, because it means that you're
    committed to agreeing with whatever the expert says at the meeting.
    Without an expert present, Trump can say "We'll have the experts work
    out the details later."

  • "The agreement should have been worked out in detail in
    advance."
    That's one way to do it. Trump wanted to do it a
    different way -- meet with Kim on a personal level and work out the
    details later -- that's equally valid.

  • "The final agreement contained no details." That's
    intentional. The details will be worked out later.

Recall that I've said in the past that the North Koreans have had one
and only one objective: Use diplomacy to force the Trump
administration to lift the sanctions, while continuing nuclear weapons
and missile development.

Kim has completely failed in this objective. They had wanted, at this
point, for Trump to be on the defensive, and force him to make a
concession, specifically to reduce the sanctions. Trump has defeated
that objective in advance by canceling the war games.

The only way that Trump could "lose" this summit, is if he suddenly
agreed to remove sanctions. That would be a diplomatic disaster.
Washington Post and Business Insider

****
**** After the summit, North Korea must make the next move
****


Remarkably, the ball is now in North Korea's court to make a
concession -- to provide the details for how they will denuclearize
according to the CVID template -- complete, verifiable, irreversible
denuclearization. If Kim can't come through, then the war games will
be back on, and the situation will return to square one. Also, Kim
would receive extreme paternal disapproval from Trump.

When Trump canceled the summit three weeks ago, the mainstream media
were completely baffled, and the left referred to Trump as a senile,
inexperienced idiot. I wrote that canceling the summit was a major
diplomatic victory for Trump. ( "25-May-18 World View -- North Korea suffers diplomatic defeat as Trump cancels summit"
)

That turned out to be exactly right, as the North Koreans immediately
started suing to get the summit back on track.

Trump's objective is to get the North to denuclearize. As I said,
everything Trump does makes sense to me, and everything that Trump has
done with respect to this negotiation has been exactly right. If it's
possible to get the North to denuclearize, then Trump has done what
needs to be done to accomplish that goal.

But the bottom line is that I believe that it's not possible to get
North Korea to denuclearize, for reasons I've given repeatedly in the
past. Here's a summary:
  • It's not Kim's decision. It's the decision of his military.
    As I've said before, I believe that if Kim seriously tried to force
    denuclearization, he'd be shot dead by one of his generals.

  • North Korea has spent decades reaching nuclear nirvana, and they
    will not give it up now, even if Kim has stars in his eyes.

  • The nuclear industry is part of a major military complex that
    controls a huge part of the economy. If the North starts reducing the
    military, it would be a major economic dislocation for the North.

  • China is still full-on preparing to launch a war with the US, and
    North Korea is just a side show anyway.

There are basic Generational Dynamics principles at work here.

First, it's a core principle of Generational Dynamics that, even in a
dictatorship, major decisions are made by masses of people, by
generations of people. The attitudes of politicians are irrelevant,
except insofar as they represent the attitudes of the people. The
reason that generational theory works is that population generations
are almost completely predictable, irrespective of what politicians
want. In this case, it means that decision to denuclearize will be
made by the people, not by Kim.

Second, Generational Dynamics tells us that there are many problems
that have no solution. By that I do not mean that no politician has
yet been clever enough to solve the problem. What I mean is that no
solution exists.

The denuclearization of North Korea is such a problem. If there were
a solution to this problem, then what Trump is doing would be a
solution, but it's not, since no solution exists. The Hankyoreh (Seoul) and Channel News Asia

****
**** President Trump says 'Sleep well tonight!'
****


On Wednesday morning, President Trump tweeted the following:

<QUOTE>"Before taking office people were assuming that we were
going to War with North Korea. President Obama said that North
Korea was our biggest and most dangerous problem. No longer -
sleep well tonight!"<END QUOTE>


In 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain returned from a
meeting with Hitler and made his famous declaration that has echoed
through time:

<QUOTE>"My good friends, for the second time in our
history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany
bringing peace with honour.

I believe it is peace for our time.

Go home and get a nice quiet sleep."<END QUOTE>


It later turned out that Hitler was planning war with Britain on the
same day that he met with Chamberlain.

To say that President Trump's tweet is eerie would not be an
overstatement. I wonder if Trump is unaware of the connection, or if
he is aware but wanted to try a little dark humor. Washington Times

Related Articles:



KEYS: Generational Dynamics, North Korea, Kim Jong-un, Donald Trump,
Steve Bannon, Nancy Pelosi, Canada, Justin Trudeau,
Neville Chamberlain

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
14-Jun-18 World View -- After the Kim-Trump summit, US and N. Korea plan denucleariza - by John J. Xenakis - 06-13-2018, 08:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,823 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,406 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,691 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,280 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,340 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)