09-30-2019, 09:50 PM
(09-26-2019, 04:52 PM)David Horn Wrote:(09-26-2019, 02:21 PM)Warren Dew Wrote: If it's linear, it has changed the same amount in the past 30 years as it will in the next 30 years. That would be nowhere near bleak or horrible; it would only be slightly more than barely noticeable.
Here is a graph that correlates CO2 with global temperature. Note: the temperature rise is directly related to industrial activity -- driven mostly by population and rising living standards.
Drivers, especially solar, were much stronger until they weren't
Warren Dew Wrote:The girl is, as John Xenakis alluded to, a witless millenial tool of boomers with ulterior motives.
Your opinion seems to track your dislike of her POV, and little to do with how well she's doing as an advocate. I think she's a bit over-the-top too, but that goes with the territory. If you want to reach the moon, aim for the stars.
At the moment, we're roughly 30 years behind the curve, and there will be serious costs. Someone who is 16 and aware, is not going to be pleased at all.
![[Image: Atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_concentration...o_2009.png]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_concentrations_and_global_annual_average_temperatures_over_the_years_1880_to_2009.png)
Oh, the elephant in the room. Let's look at CO2 levels and population size. I see Gretna didn't mention this. Gretna's just another pet rock. Take just one look for the novelty and forget/ignore.
https://www.marketcalls.in/statistics/po...harts.html
Population drives deforestation, resource depletion, and pollution. So, when is Trumper gonna let Planned Parenthood loose to fix THE problem.
---Value Added 
