Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 28-Jul-16 World View -- China, Japan vociferously object to South Korea's THAAD missile system deployment

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • China and Russia vociferously hostile to South Korea's THAAD deployment
  • South Korea's fears of an attack from North Korea
  • Problems, issues and capabilities surrounding the Thaad system

****
**** China and Russia vociferously hostile to South Korea's THAAD deployment
****


[Image: g160727b.jpg]
Residents of Seongju, where Thaad is to be deployed, conducting anti-Thaad protests in Seoul (Korea Times)

Earlier this month, the US and South Korea announced the deployment of
the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in South Korea by the
end of the year. It's considered to be the most advance anti-missile
system available anywhere today because it can blast incoming missiles
out of the sky with 100% success rate.

It's part of the Obama administration's policy of "Pivot To Asia."
Its purpose is to provide both South Korea and Japan with a defense to
increasing threats from North Korea of missile attacks, both
conventional and nuclear.

Despite request from the US for years, South Korea had resisted
deployment of the Thaad system for years, for fear of angering the
Chinese. What finally triggered the change of mind was North Korea's
fourth nuclear bomb test on January 6, followed by a long-range
missile test on February 7.

North Korea immediately said it would retaliate against South Korea,
threatening to launch a retaliatory strike against the THAAD
deployment by turning the South "into a sea of fire and a pile of
ashes." It then conducted more tests, launching three missiles into
the sea off the east coast of the Korean peninsula.

Russia's Foreign Ministry said that the Thaad deployment would
escalate tensions in the region:

[indent]<QUOTE>"Such actions, no matter how they are explained, very
negatively affect global strategic security, adherence to which is
so often discussed by Washington. They may also result in
escalation of tensions in the region, new difficulties for
resolving acute problems of the Korean Peninsula, including the
task of its denuclearization."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

China compares the deployment of Thaad in South Korea to the
deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba in 1962. According to China's
state media:

[indent]<QUOTE>"If Seoul believes that Washington's missile shield
could effectively deter the threats from the North, it is making a
strategic mistake.

The truth is that the United States does not care about whether
South Korea is safe or not. What it truly wants is an anti-missile
system that could guarantee America's military supremacy in the
Asia-Pacific and beyond.

After the United States deployed four THAAD ... systems on its own
soil and installed two X-Band radars in Japan, South Korea is now
the missing piece. That's why Washington has relentlessly tried to
get THAAD into South Korea since 2012.

Once letting THAAD in, Seoul will become one of Washington's handy
tools, losing its autonomy in crafting and executing an
independent foreign policy."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

China's military said that it will take "necessary measures" to
respond to Thaad, without disclosing what those measures are.
Business Insider and VOA and Xinhua (Beijing) and Tass (Moscow) and The Hankyoreh (Seoul)

****
**** South Korea's fears of an attack from North Korea
****


On March 26, 2010, the South Korean warship Cheonan was sunk by an
explosion. (See "21-May-10 News -- S. Korea accuses N. Korea of sinking warship"
) Then, on
November 23 of the same year, the North Korean military launched
dozens of artillery shells on South Korea's Yeonpyeong Island, killing
four people, including two civilians. ( "24-Nov-10 News -- South Korean civilians shelled by North Koreans"
)

Both of these incidents were acts of war on the part of North Korea,
though South Korea never retaliated, but instead allowed the situation
to cool down. But with subsequent nuclear tests and long-range
missile tests, many South Koreans believe that the North is just
waiting for the appropriate time for a full-scale attack on the
south, starting with the extremely vulnerable capital city Seoul,
which is only a few miles from the DMZ (the demiliterized zone,
separating North and South Korea).

Last year, South Korean media reported that a defector who used to
serve in a senior position in the North Korean military revealed that
in August 2012, South Korea's child dictator Kim Jong-un approved a
plan for a 7-day asymmetric war against the South, and that Kim has
been implementing the plan since then.

The objective is that the North would occupy the entire South Korean
territory within seven days, before United States reinforcements could
arrive. It also contains a plan to conclude the war within 15 days at
most if the North cannot end the war within a week due to resistance
by the South and U.S. Forces Korea.

The report lists the following "asymmetric capabilities" that the
North would use against the South:
  • The North is at a final stage of completing nuclear arms, and
    has made progress in miniaturizing them to place on missiles.
  • It has 1,000 short, medium and long-range missiles.
  • North increased multiple rocket launchers from 4,800 to
    5,500.
  • It has 70 submarines and is developing new ones.
  • The North increased its special operations forces from 80,000 to
    200,000.
  • It developed hovercraft and new high-speed, wave piercing craft
    called Very Slender Vessels (VSVs).

According to a South Korean intelligence official:

[indent]<QUOTE>"The North did thorough analyses of the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan. It concluded that it won’t have a chance if a
war drags on. To end it quickly, Pyongyang reached a decision that
asymmetric warfare is the only answer, despite the pressures and
condemnations of the international community."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

JoongAng Ilbo (Seoul, 8-Jan-2015)

****
**** Problems, issues and capabilities surrounding the Thaad system
****


On Tuesday, South Korea deported two Korean-American activists on
after they tried to enter the country for a "peace tour" that would
have seen them take part in anti-Thaad protests.

Anti-Thaad protests have been increasing in South Korea, particularly
among residents of Seongju, a rural county about 180 miles from Seoul,
which is where the Thaad system is to be deployed. Residents feared
harmful radiation that could be emitted from the Thaad's
electromagnetic radar waves. In order to defuse these protests, the
US military personnel invited South Korean reporters to Guam to
inspect a Thaad installation that was already installed, similar to
the one being planned for Seongju county. US personnel showed that
the radiation levels were far below those permitted by law.

This didn't satisfy the residents of Seongju, however, as they pelted
the car of prime minister Hwang Kyo-ahn with eggs during his visit to
the town and left him stranded in his car for hours.

Other protesters simply claimed that the Thaad deployment would not
protect the South from an attack by the North. An in-depth analysis
by the U.S.-Korea Institute (38North) at Johns Hopkins University
shows that a Thaad deployment, combined with an upgrade of South
Korea's existing Patriot anti-missile system, could protect all of
South Korea from North Korean missiles:

[indent]<QUOTE>"The THAAD system intercepts incoming short, medium
and intermediate range ballistic missiles above the
atmosphere—exoatmospheric intercept—providing an upper-tier layer
of defense when operating in conjunction with the lower-tier
Patriots. THAAD consists of five primary components: interceptor
missiles, launch canisters, AN/TPY-2 phased array radar, a
fire-control unit, and support equipment—including a
power-generation and cooling units. These can detect and track
targets at a range of about 1000 km—assuming the target has a
radar-cross section of about 1 m2."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

However, it isn't 100% effective, and a nuclear missile could still
pass through, causing many casualties. Hankyoreh (Seoul) and UPI and 38 North (10-Mar-2016) and Lockheed Martin



KEYS: Generational Dynamics, North Korea, South Korea, Seongju county,
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, THAAD, China, Russia,
Cheonan, Yeonpyeong Island, Kim Jong-un, 38 North

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
28-Jul-16 World View -- China, Japan vociferously object to South Korea's THAAD - by John J. Xenakis - 07-27-2016, 09:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,826 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,409 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,693 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,286 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,340 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)