Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generational Dynamics World View
*** 11-Aug-16 World View -- Vietnam deploys rocket launchers in South China Sea to confront China

This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
  • Vietnam deploys rocket launchers in South China Sea to confront China
  • Japan-China relations 'deteriorate significantly' after repeated Chinese provocations

****
**** Vietnam deploys rocket launchers in South China Sea to confront China
****


[Image: g160810b.jpg]
EXTended Range Artillery (EXTRA) mobile rocket system from Israel Military Industries

Reports indicate that Vietnam is deploying rocket launchers on five of
its bases in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. The
launchers have been hidden from aerial surveillance and they have yet
to be armed, but could be made operational with rocket artillery
rounds within two or three days. Vietnam's Foreign Ministry responded
to the reports by saying that the information was "inaccurate,"
without elaborating.

It's believed that Vietnam is deploying a state of the art EXTended
Range Artillery (EXTRA) rocket system that it recently acquired from
Israel Military Industries.

The EXTRA is a highly mobile weapon system and can be installed on
either a truck or in a fixed installation. Vietnam procured the new
mobile rocket launchers specifically with the Spratlys in mind given
that it requires little logistical support -- e.g., it only uses a
small lightweight radar system—and has very low maintenance costs
(EXTRA rounds come in disposable sealed canisters).

EXTRA is equipped with a GPS inertial navigation system that makes it
highly accurate up to a range of 150 km (93 miles), with different 150
kg (330 lb) warheads that can carry high explosives or bomblets to
attack multiple targets simultaneously. Operated with targeting
drones, they could strike both ships and land targets. That puts
China's artificial islands, and the military installations installed
on them, within range of the rocket system.

Vietnam and China have fought several wars in the last few decades.
In a 1979 border war, China invaded Vietnam with 80,000 soldiers.
They were driven back by the Vietnamese within six weeks, killing as
many as 50,000 people on both sides. In their retreat, the Chinese
implemented a barbaric scorched-earth policy, destroying every
building and killing every animal. In 1974, China seized the Paracels
by force from Vietnam, and in 1988, Chinese naval forces defeated the
Vietnamese navy at Johnson South Reef.

So it's not an exaggeration to say that both sides are preparing for
war, and in the current highly tense atmosphere, with surging
nationalism and xenophobia on both sides, a war could start any day.
Reuters and The Diplomat and Israel Military Industries

****
**** Japan-China relations 'deteriorate significantly' after repeated Chinese provocations
****


In moves that are apparently intended to provoke the Japanese, Chinese
coast guard vessels have been entering waters surrounding the
Senkaku/Diaoyu islands. The Senkaku Islands are governed by Japan,
but are claimed by China as their sovereign territory.

According to Japan's coast guard, 13 coast guard vessels sails through
Japanese waters surrounding the Senkakus on Tuesday. This has
happened already four times this month, and Tuesday's incident was the
third day in a row. It's believed that some of the ships contain
military forces.

Japan's government summoned the Chinese envoy to launch a formal
objection. According to Japan's foreign minister Fumio Kishida:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"The situation surrounding the Japan-China
> relationship is significantly deteriorating. We cannot accept
> that [China] is taking actions that unilaterally raise
> tensions."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

At Wednesday's US US State Dept. press briefing, spokesman Elizabeth
Trudeau made a point of issuing a statement in defense of Japan:

> [indent]<QUOTE>"We continue to closely monitor the situation around
> the Senkaku Islands. We are in close communication with the
> Japanese as allies and are also concerned about the increase of
> Chinese coast guard vessels in the vicinity of the islands. As you
> noted, the U.S. position on the Senkaku Islands, as stated
> previously by the President, is clear and longstanding. The
> Senkaku Islands have been under Japanese administration since the
> reversion of Okinawa in 1972, such they fall within the scope of
> the article 5 of the 1960 U.S.-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation
> and Security. We oppose any unilateral action that seeks to
> undermine Japan’s administration of the Senkaku
> islands."<END QUOTE>
[/indent]

The statement contains an explicit reference to article 5 of the 1960
U.S.-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security. According to
that treaty, US armed forces will defend Japan if China takes any
military action against Japan or the Senkakus. Nikkei and BBC and US State Dept.


KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Vietnam, China, South China Sea, Spratly Islands,
Israel Military Industries, EXTended Range Artillery, EXTRA,
Japan, Senkaku Islands, Diaoyu Islands, Fumio Kishida, Elizabeth Trudeau,
1960 U.S.-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security

Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Contribute to Generational Dynamics via PayPal

John J. Xenakis
100 Memorial Drive Apt 8-13A
Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-864-0010
E-mail: john@GenerationalDynamics.com
Web site: http://www.GenerationalDynamics.com
Forum: http://www.gdxforum.com/forum
Subscribe to World View: http://generationaldynamics.com/subscribe
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-14-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 05-23-2016, 10:31 PM
11-Aug-16 World View -- Vietnam deploys rocket launchers in South China Sea to confro - by John J. Xenakis - 08-10-2016, 10:03 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by radind - 08-11-2016, 08:59 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 01-18-2017, 09:23 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 02-04-2017, 10:08 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by SomeGuy - 03-15-2017, 03:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 05-30-2017, 01:04 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 07-08-2017, 01:34 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 08-10-2017, 02:38 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 10-25-2017, 03:07 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by rds - 10-31-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by noway2 - 11-20-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-28-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 12-31-2017, 11:14 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 06-22-2018, 02:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:54 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-19-2018, 12:43 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-25-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 07-11-2018, 01:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-18-2018, 03:42 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Galen - 08-19-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 09-25-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-09-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Camz - 03-10-2020, 10:10 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 03-12-2020, 11:11 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by JDG 66 - 03-16-2020, 03:21 PM
RE: 58 year rule - by Tim Randal Walker - 04-01-2020, 11:17 AM
RE: 58 year rule - by John J. Xenakis - 04-02-2020, 12:25 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by Isoko - 05-04-2020, 02:51 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by tg63 - 01-04-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by CH86 - 01-05-2021, 11:17 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-10-2021, 06:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-11-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-12-2021, 02:53 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 03:58 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-13-2021, 04:16 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by mamabug - 01-15-2021, 03:36 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-19-2021, 03:03 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 08-21-2021, 01:41 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-27-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 12:26 AM
RE: Generational Dynamics World View - by galaxy - 02-28-2022, 04:08 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the social dynamics viewpoint to the Strauss-Howe generational theory is wrong Ldr 5 4,826 06-05-2020, 10:55 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Theory: cyclical generational hormone levels behind the four turnings and archetypes Ldr 2 3,409 03-16-2020, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Ldr
  The Fall of Cities of the Ancient World (42 Years) The Sacred Name of God 42 Letters Mark40 5 4,693 01-08-2020, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  Generational cycle research Mikebert 15 16,287 02-08-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
Video Styxhexenhammer666 and his view of historical cycles. Kinser79 0 3,340 08-27-2017, 06:31 PM
Last Post: Kinser79

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)