01-27-2017, 01:13 AM
(01-26-2017, 01:56 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:I associate social insurance as you say with sustaining peace and stability within the inner cities. I view it the same way. I understand how it can be used in ones favor (extortion, inducing riots for the cameras) as a threat or a political means to pacify a population (keep a population complacent and non violent and content) and a reason for you to be scared/concerned as an individual or politically upset as a progressive.(01-26-2017, 01:28 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:(01-25-2017, 11:58 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:Are you saying that you're weren't doing that? Do you know why you're failing at preaching blue gospel and receiving support for government charity programs and failing to convince others of your sincerity? You can't hide your self centered behavior, your super ego or your obvious disdain for others who disagree with you. How far do we need to go? My advice, place us all on you're ignore list and post liberal stuff. Have you noticed anything different starting to happen with this forum? As I said, I'm down to one.(01-25-2017, 07:07 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote:(01-25-2017, 03:45 PM)David Horn Wrote: Unfortunately, your America is the vastly poorer half. If it comes down a schism, don't count on doing all that well.You assume that it is. I'm politically associated with largely middle income and above.
You and Warren make the same mistake. You judge the condition and policies of the entire country based on your own personal situation.
Of course I'm not doing that; neither are most liberals. They understand that what is best for the whole is best for the individual. You guys reverse that: what's good for you personally is good for the whole, whether there's any link between your personal fortunes and political policies or not. When you have no basis for disagreeing with me, resorting to insults against me instead does not win your argument.
You fail again to understand social insurance, and you call it charity.