08-16-2017, 02:33 PM
(08-16-2017, 02:26 PM)noway2 Wrote:(08-16-2017, 02:11 PM)David Horn Wrote: If your argument rests on these "historical monuments" then you're already on shaky ground. These were, for the most part, the products of unreconstructed Confederates and their kin, and intended to make the point that the Southern white man was still king in the South. Most were erected in the early 20th century, not immediately after the ACW. Their historical import is dubious, unless it's intended to remind everyone of segregation and, oh yeah, lynchings.
I'm not entirely certain what you mean by on shaky ground. If you're trying to claim that these blacks and their white snowflake lackeys that are committing vandalism have some sort of moral high ground for their actions, you would be grossly mistaken. They are, however, running the risk of getting put down, hard, as other people are taking great offense to the desecration. The biggest thing preventing it is that the unlike this crowd, some people have jobs and obligations.
It's hard to desecrate a symbol intended to sow fear and keep "them" in their place. You don't see Hitler statues in Germany, but Stalin is still "revered" in Putin's Russia. I wonder why.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.