The Maelstrom of Violence

[Warren Dew]

(09-17-2017, 03:35 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote:

(09-17-2017, 12:45 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:

(09-17-2017, 01:06 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: It seems like you, as well as the Nazi and Confederates, are embracing harm.

Implying that Kinser is basically a Nazi, as you just did, looks like hate speech to me.  But hey, it's always been clear that you're fine with hate speech when you're the one speaking.

Kinser did not explicitly endorse the Nazi or Confederate positions, but he does seem to violently oppose Canadian and European speech laws intended to stop hate speech.  This makes him...  how do you say it politely... an odd duck.  What is it that he advocates if not hate speech?

I'd like him to be explicit.  Other countries oppose hate speech, and the alt red are vehemently against a few specific countries.  Can the alt right at least be explicit in the type of speech they are advocating?  They like to dance around the issue.  I'm opposed to the dance.

Of late I have been against the blue evening comedy people and the red daytime political radio pundits.  Some of them do and some of them don't use dirty words.  Just about all of them will vile stereotype, will poorly describe what their opponents actually want, will characterize opponent's motives and models poorly and maliciously.  I oppose that, and believe I have said as much.

I would prefer honest evaluation and decent language.  Working with others, it is impossible to get. 

Could you give a few examples of what you perceive as my hate speech?

Just gave you one.  Seems like you managed to talk yourself into ignoring it.

If you actually wanted honest evaluation and decent language, you'd apologize and stop it instead.  Alternatively, you could learn to ignore what you perceive to be others' hate speech, and count on them to ignore yours, too.

But really, it seems you don't want honest evaluation and decent language; you just want to confirm your biases.