(01-31-2017, 12:23 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:08 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-30-2017, 11:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: But the blue is the majority by 2.86 million votes.

This whole idea would not be necessary if you guys grew up and dropped your Reaganomics and its associated dog whistles for white power and Christian fundamentalism. The Confederacy was no utopia, mate.

It's looks like the majority of the blues live along the west coast. Do we still need the west coast? Which side of the San Andreas fault are you and the majority of blues located? The right side or the wrong side as you and the blue survival as a majority are concerned.

Oh, that's easy.   The San Andreas Fault does indeed do a good match of being a red/blue divide.  So the Pacific plate is blue and the North American plate is mostly red.  That can be a problem though.  It's hard to build a wall next to a seismically active area.

Speaking of walls, we have a hypocrite.  Mark Fuckerberg is it.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/29/technology/mark-zuckerberg-wall/index.html
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/04/12/zuckerberg-references-trumps-call-border-wall-f8-conference/82940466/

(01-31-2017, 12:20 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:08 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-30-2017, 11:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: But the blue is the majority by 2.86 million votes.

This whole idea would not be necessary if you guys grew up and dropped your Reaganomics and its associated dog whistles for white power and Christian fundamentalism. The Confederacy was no utopia, mate.

It's looks like the majority of the blues live along the west coast. Do we still need the west coast? Which side of the San Andreas fault are you and the majority of blues located? The right side or the wrong side as you and the blue survival as a majority are concerned.

LOL Classic, no that won't quite work. The San Andreas verges out to sea on the left side (west side) of San Francisco. It's also west of San Jose. Then it goes back on land, but only in the Point Reyes Seashore area. I suppose there's a few fault lines to the east that could work tho.

Blues are usually stronger on the northeast coast than the west coast. This year because of Trump and his anti-Mexican hoopla, that shifted because of the large number of hispanics in the southwest, and a Rust Belt element in some of the eastern states.

(01-31-2017, 12:20 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:08 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-30-2017, 11:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: But the blue is the majority by 2.86 million votes.

This whole idea would not be necessary if you guys grew up and dropped your Reaganomics and its associated dog whistles for white power and Christian fundamentalism. The Confederacy was no utopia, mate.

It's looks like the majority of the blues live along the west coast. Do we still need the west coast? Which side of the San Andreas fault are you and the majority of blues located? The right side or the wrong side as you and the blue survival as a majority are concerned.

LOL Classic, no that won't quite work. The San Andreas verges out to sea on the left side (west side) of San Francisco. It's also west of San Jose. Then it goes back on land, but only in the Point Reyes Seashore area. I suppose there's a few fault lines to the east that could work tho.

Blues are usually stronger on the northeast coast than the west coast. This year because of Trump and his anti-Mexican hoopla, that shifted because of the large number of hispanics in the southwest, and a Rust Belt element in some of the eastern states.

(01-31-2017, 12:23 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:08 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-30-2017, 11:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: But the blue is the majority by 2.86 million votes.

This whole idea would not be necessary if you guys grew up and dropped your Reaganomics and its associated dog whistles for white power and Christian fundamentalism. The Confederacy was no utopia, mate.

It's looks like the majority of the blues live along the west coast. Do we still need the west coast? Which side of the San Andreas fault are you and the majority of blues located? The right side or the wrong side as you and the blue survival as a majority are concerned.

Oh, that's easy.   The San Andreas Fault does indeed do a good match of being a red/blue divide.  So the Pacific plate is blue and the North American plate is mostly red.  That can be a problem though.  It's hard to build a wall next to a seismically active area.

Speaking of walls, we have a hypocrite.  Mark Fuckerberg is it.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/29/technology/mark-zuckerberg-wall/index.html
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/04/12/zuckerberg-references-trumps-call-border-wall-f8-conference/82940466/

(01-31-2017, 12:36 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:20 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:08 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-30-2017, 11:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: But the blue is the majority by 2.86 million votes.

This whole idea would not be necessary if you guys grew up and dropped your Reaganomics and its associated dog whistles for white power and Christian fundamentalism. The Confederacy was no utopia, mate.

It's looks like the majority of the blues live along the west coast. Do we still need the west coast? Which side of the San Andreas fault are you and the majority of blues located? The right side or the wrong side as you and the blue survival as a majority are concerned.

LOL Classic, no that won't quite work. The San Andreas verges out to sea on the left side (west side) of San Francisco. It's also west of San Jose. Then it goes back on land, but only in the Point Reyes Seashore area. I suppose there's a few fault lines to the east that could work tho.

Blues are usually stronger on the northeast coast than the west coast. This year because of Trump and his anti-Mexican hoopla, that shifted because of the large number of hispanics in the southwest, and a Rust Belt element in some of the eastern states.

Darn. I was hoping that God could take care of that issue for us. Are you still stuck on the 2.86 million votes that didn't matter? Trump seems to have fun smearing your faces with it and I'm having fun watching your media making fools of themselves on CNN and other places.

(01-31-2017, 12:45 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:20 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 12:08 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-30-2017, 11:53 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: But the blue is the majority by 2.86 million votes.

This whole idea would not be necessary if you guys grew up and dropped your Reaganomics and its associated dog whistles for white power and Christian fundamentalism. The Confederacy was no utopia, mate.

It's looks like the majority of the blues live along the west coast. Do we still need the west coast? Which side of the San Andreas fault are you and the majority of blues located? The right side or the wrong side as you and the blue survival as a majority are concerned.

LOL Classic, no that won't quite work. The San Andreas verges out to sea on the left side (west side) of San Francisco. It's also west of San Jose. Then it goes back on land, but only in the Point Reyes Seashore area. I suppose there's a few fault lines to the east that could work tho.

Blues are usually stronger on the northeast coast than the west coast. This year because of Trump and his anti-Mexican hoopla, that shifted because of the large number of hispanics in the southwest, and a Rust Belt element in some of the eastern states.

Maybe we can piece some of the faults in the fault zone together, eh?

(01-31-2017, 01:33 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: <snip>
Maybe we can piece some of the faults in the fault zone together, eh?



I think geo-politics moves a hell of a lot faster than geo-plate tectonics. But then, red climate science deniers are having trouble understanding the relative speed of changes in that field too.

(01-31-2017, 01:43 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 01:33 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: <snip>
Maybe we can piece some of the faults in the fault zone together, eh?



I think geo-politics moves a hell of a lot faster than geo-plate tectonics. But then, red climate science deniers are having trouble understanding the relative speed of changes in that field too.

Let's try this again. 

1. Look for San Fransisco.  This should be easy for Eric since that's in your neighborhood.
2. Now, look at all of those faults around San Francisco.
3. I'm sure one of those makes a nice blue /red boundary we can use. I'm sure one or more of those is east of the blue zone.

(01-31-2017, 02:16 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: Yes I was suggesting that in my posts, which you have trouble reading.

It's still just an arbitrary line; an actual political red-blue division would be still further east. The lands west of the faults are not going to separate off into the sea. Although maybe Tulsi thinks so.

By the way it's a pretty good bet that the Hayward Fault will blow sometime soon after late August of this year.

(01-31-2017, 02:32 AM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(01-31-2017, 02:16 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: Yes I was suggesting that in my posts, which you have trouble reading.

It's still just an arbitrary line; an actual political red-blue division would be still further east. The lands west of the faults are not going to separate off into the sea. Although maybe Tulsi thinks so.

By the way it's a pretty good bet that the Hayward Fault will blow sometime soon after late August of this year.

Tulsi isn't party of the California fault discussion, silly.
And... no, chunks of California don't go slip slip sliding into Pacific due to faults.  Storms that cause landslides, sure, faults no.

(01-31-2017, 11:59 AM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: California is actually adding new land to the continent. There are places where sea shells less than 1M years old (which are not even properly fossilized yet) are up on top of the hills. We are making America even greater than it already is.

(02-02-2017, 01:49 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: Well in the case of OR and WA they would simply revert to (British) Columbia. Since there would no longer be a need to distinguish the part of the former Columbia Territory north of 49N, the whole province could just be called Columbia. Realistically, though, since the most populated province is Ontario, and even so, is less populated than any one of the  three states, we'd have to subdivide the west coast into several new provinces in order to maintain order.

(02-06-2017, 12:10 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: Trump Just Threatened to Defund The State Of California
By Grant Stern Posted on February 6, 2017
http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/02/06/trump-just-threatened-defund-state-california/

The state of California’s Democratic lawmakers began planning to fight Donald Trump’s dubious “Sanctuary Cities” executive order last weekend. The City of San Francisco and Santa Clara County both filed suit (see below) against the President over the issue.  After initial reports indicated the state of California was seeking ways to strip funding from federal programs to make up the shortfall, state Democratic Senators voted to make the entire state into the first “Sanctuary State.” If passed, California’s law would call upon the Constitution’s 10th Amendment to shield all municipalities from ever being forced to follow a federal enforcement mandate in immigration law.

Now, the President said in a TV interview that he plans to punish America’s largest state economy, which has over 1/7th of our nation’s population, is the sixth-largest economy in the world, and is a significant net donor state to the federal budget. CNBC reports:

“If we have to, we’ll defund,” he said. “We give tremendous amounts of money to California.”  California is “out of control” in many ways, and voters agree “otherwise they wouldn’t have voted for me,” he added. Trump lost California, which leans left politically, by a wide margin to former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

“I don’t want to defund the state or city, I don’t want to defund anybody, I want to give them the money they need to properly operate a city or a state,” Trump said. That said, “if they’re going to have sanctuary cities we may have to do that – certainly that would be a weapon.”  The president told Fox he is very much opposed to sanctuary cities, which he called “ridiculous.” Trump also added, “They breed crime, there’s a lot of problems.”

CNBC also said that up to $9 billion dollars of vital federal research funds which are currently going to the state’s acclaimed university system, much of which has turned Silicon Valley into the nation’s premiere skilled employment center.  The state’s two largest recipient cities who don’t enforce immigration law (because legally they don’t have to) are San Francisco and Los Angeles, which together receive over $500 million dollars in federal funding annually. According to Reuters, the top ten American cities impacted will lose up to $2.27 billion dollars of the financing per year if the order is fully enforced.

California only gets back 78 cents for every federal tax dollar sent off to Washington, D.C. already making the state a major supporter of the many small states which voted Republican. In fact, a 2014 study by The Atlantic found that California is one of the very few states to get a negative return on investment

Trump’s blundering and thoughtless actions are going create yet another constitutional crisis as he fights the behemoth state of California, who is one of the least dependent on federal aid. If California’s plan to become a sanctuary state becomes a reality, the President’s misguided executive order will have had the entirely opposite of the intended effect and will place the feds forever on the wrong side of the law in one of America’s major border states.

California’s law and the resulting fight with President Trump Bannon will also provide a blueprint for other cities and states seeking to use the Constitution’s 10th Amendment to check federal power in law enforcement, possibly weakening our central government in unforeseen ways around the country.

http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/02/06/trump-just-threatened-defund-state-california/

(02-06-2017, 04:06 PM)Marypoza Wrote: Hmmmmm....... can a Washexit be next?

https://getenigma.tv/the-governor-of-washington-just-declared-donald-trump-an-enemy-of-the-united-states-this-is-powerful/

Kunstler Wrote:Beh0ld, this humdinger, The Wrapper” (artist’s rendering) designed by architect Eric Own Moss for Culver City, California, a dreary gerrymandered backwater of Los Angeles under the LAX flight-path. Is the building wearing a straight-jacket to prevent it from hurting itself? It demonstrates that the architecture “community” won’t tire of playing self-referential computer games with large objects that the public has to live with for generations. Developer Frederick Samitaur Smith told The LA Times it’s been repeatably delayed given the difficulty gaining city approvals for the structure, because of its unique exoskeleton. What a surprise! Notice the anticipated pedestrian activity around the building’s base. Makes Blade Runner look like Jimmy Stewart’s Bedford Falls. Happy New Year everybody!

(02-06-2017, 06:25 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(02-06-2017, 04:06 PM)Marypoza Wrote: Hmmmmm....... can a Washexit be next?

https://getenigma.tv/the-governor-of-washington-just-declared-donald-trump-an-enemy-of-the-united-states-this-is-powerful/

Well, why stop at States?  I bet the eastern parts of the Pacific states would like to secede from their states.


And speaking of MoonbeamLand just look at this LSD inspired building!

Kunstler Wrote:Beh0ld, this humdinger, The Wrapper” (artist’s rendering) designed by architect Eric Own Moss for Culver City, California, a dreary gerrymandered backwater of Los Angeles under the LAX flight-path. Is the building wearing a straight-jacket to prevent it from hurting itself? It demonstrates that the architecture “community” won’t tire of playing self-referential computer games with large objects that the public has to live with for generations. Developer Frederick Samitaur Smith told The LA Times it’s been repeatably delayed given the difficulty gaining city approvals for the structure, because of its unique exoskeleton. What a surprise! Notice the anticipated pedestrian activity around the building’s base. Makes Blade Runner look like Jimmy Stewart’s Bedford Falls. Happy New Year everybody!

(02-06-2017, 06:25 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:

(02-06-2017, 04:06 PM)Marypoza Wrote: Hmmmmm....... can a Washexit be next?

https://getenigma.tv/the-governor-of-washington-just-declared-donald-trump-an-enemy-of-the-united-states-this-is-powerful/

Well, why stop at States?  I bet the eastern parts of the Pacific states would like to secede from their states.


And speaking of MoonbeamLand just look at this LSD inspired building!

Kunstler Wrote:Beh0ld, this humdinger, The Wrapper” (artist’s rendering) designed by architect Eric Own Moss for Culver City, California, a dreary gerrymandered backwater of Los Angeles under the LAX flight-path. Is the building wearing a straight-jacket to prevent it from hurting itself? It demonstrates that the architecture “community” won’t tire of playing self-referential computer games with large objects that the public has to live with for generations. Developer Frederick Samitaur Smith told The LA Times it’s been repeatably delayed given the difficulty gaining city approvals for the structure, because of its unique exoskeleton. What a surprise! Notice the anticipated pedestrian activity around the building’s base. Makes Blade Runner look like Jimmy Stewart’s Bedford Falls. Happy New Year everybody!