05-20-2016, 04:23 PM
(05-20-2016, 08:53 AM)Kinser79 Wrote: A sample size of 196 is not indicative of anything. The size of the sample is far too small. They may have only found a couple dozen extremely stupid people. This needs to be replicated with a much larger sample size.
Are you implying it won't? Often a smaller study is done to see if a full study is worth doing.