Why rural voters don’t vote Democratic anymore

[Galen]

(12-03-2016, 05:42 AM)taramarie Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 05:34 AM)Galen Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 05:27 AM)taramarie Wrote: If it were up to me segregation seems best so to allow people to live their desired way of life the way they want to....but there would be relocation issues so it is not possible. Mere pie in the sky.

You picked a bad example with abortion because of the complexity of the issue and the fact that from a certain point of view a life is involved.  Given the libertarian view on secession, you have to admit that libertarians have a similar view on the solution as you do.  Pity the liberals and progressives will not accept such a solution.  Ironically, the red necks would be perfectly happy with your solution.  There lies the difference between the red necks and the left.

A life is at stake either way due to if it is banned a woman who is desperate to have the abortion will find other methods like underground methods or knitting needle. I am sure you are aware how dangerous that is. It is just what will happen unfortunately. Cannot stop that. But can make it safer methods and even preventative methods.

Either way a life is at risk. So I do not think it was a bad example. As for culturally concerned conservatives being happy with the solution I will have to believe that to see it. One on one basis too. Aaaanyway time for kiwis to hop to bed. Will be back in a few hours to see how this conversation has progressed. Interesting topic.

This is why libertarians on the whole tend not to want to impose a solution from above the way liberals and progressives do.  With the degree of centralization that exists in the US there is a tendency to use the Federal Government as a club to beat opponents over the head with.  You haven't really spent much time around the red necks in the US and the mainstream media is less than reliable.