05-27-2016, 07:44 AM
(05-26-2016, 03:31 PM)Odin Wrote:(05-26-2016, 11:05 AM)playwrite Wrote:(05-25-2016, 04:16 PM)Odin Wrote: Many of Hillary's supporters remind me a lot of Trump's supporters, authoritarian follower types who insist that their shit-covered Dear Leader smells wonderful and attack anyone who says otherwise.
In addition to calling someone's choice of candidate a "shit-covered Dear leader," you have used every innuendo, outright lie, and Right wingnut meme to attack her. And when someone points out just how imbecilic your claims, you whine "authoritarian."
While it is apparent that you can't seem to correctly apply that big word you have learned, I will still suggest you try something a tad more complicated and look up the two-word terms of "cognitive dissonance" and "psychological projection." I'm sure you'll wind up with the same level of misuse as your current big word, but one can always hold out some hope even for you.
Oh, and if that doesn't work, maybe look up and consider the thought -
"If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen."
Thanks for proving my point. I have a psych degree, so I know perfectly well what Projection and Cognitive Dissonance is, and you suffer from both. You are the worst kind of simple-minded political partisan.
Let's try again, Odin: you attack someone's candidate of choice, that someone points out the fallacies of your attack, and you call the counter as 'authoritarian' because, well, screw facts and logic, you're right because you're right and the other person is just a meany authoritarian because he disagrees with you. Funny.
But what's really funny is you now believe this is an example of the other's projection. It classic. You should re-take that class and bring this exchange as a great example - I'm sure it will be fun for you.