02-07-2017, 06:46 PM
(02-07-2017, 06:30 PM)SomeGuy Wrote:(02-07-2017, 06:21 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:(02-07-2017, 05:52 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: Which is the point I was making to Dave above. "Patriots" in the lead-up to the Revolution or Abolitionists in the 1850s were never an absolute majority of the population. Likewise for secessionist firebrands in the Confederacy, if your sensibilities were hurt by the above comparison. They were just dominant among the people with the power and inclination to actually do something (for values that do not include posting on the internet).
As Samuel Adams once said,
Quote:It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
Right at the moment the "red" faction has just won a major victory, and appears to be spurring a reaction amongst the "blues". It remains to be seen how that plays out. We've seen some violence, but not much. If it increases, why, there's your social moment.
Still lots of ways this could play out.
I think it's a contest with this:
Anarcho-communists
vs. ?
This:
I
---Value Added