02-12-2017, 09:13 AM
(02-12-2017, 04:13 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:(02-12-2017, 02:00 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote:I've been seeing the blue's perspective and disagreeing with their perspectives and pointing out the major flaws with their perspective and my issues with their perspective for years. So, you're right, I've only been focused on one (the blue) perspective with all other perspectives being more or less side lined or voluntarily removed. Did you know this?(02-11-2017, 10:30 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote: I only see one bubble here and a growing number of individuals who are speaking against those who are associated with the bubble.
Well, yes, it is really obvious that you're seeing only one perspective. So many are similarly limited. More important even than the issues is the attitude and closed mind that makes folks unable to open themselves to other perspectives.
I'd say you are going at a vile stereotype of the blue perspective and are bad at listening to what actual blue leaning folk are really trying to say. You also blatantly advocate for a variation on the red perspective, what you call the 'American' perspective, often claiming your ideals are shared by a lot of folk... which is to an extent true enough.
I don't see myself a pure blue or the best of all possible representative of the blue community. I approved of Scalia for example, and side with the reds on the history and law aspects of the gun policy discussion. I have definite disagreements with Eric, although that's hardly unusual. I don't see you as any more the platonic ideal of the perfect red person than I am perfect blue. We're all individuals, and labels like blue and red ought to be understood as vague envelopes. This is why I often call myself 'blue leaning' rather than 'blue'.
It is natural and expected for me that an extreme partisan will be angry at a distorted caricature of what the other guys think, while perceiving themselves as common sense reality dwelling virtuous people. Lots of folks are like that. I'd suggest that both the red and blue leaning communities have a solid basis in history, experience and memories of past crises. It is easy for folk coming from either angle to see themselves as common sense virtuous reality dwellers. I have problems with folks that see their own perspective as uniquely true while focusing on the worst aspects of other perspectives.
It's really easy, by picking out a bunch of unfavorable aspects of this age group, that culture, that gender, whatever group someone wants to dislike, to work up a despicable stereotype. I think it far easier to sense when one is being treated as a stereotype than it is to see one's own prejudices.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.