Why did the last 4T have so much better music than this 4T?

[Ragnarök_62]

(03-02-2017, 05:02 PM)disasterzone Wrote:

(03-02-2017, 04:01 PM)David Horn Wrote:

(03-02-2017, 02:28 PM)disasterzone Wrote:

(03-02-2017, 07:49 AM)Odin Wrote: 80 years from now some self-absorbed Civic is going to ask the same exact question.

Compare these songs to the songs we hear on the pop charts now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gx5DhKN_zY

Many Civics and younger Adaptives think that the music was much better then
These songs are classics and had a lot of harmony and raw talent
They made you feel better

Most younger music aficionados lean on the music of the 60s and early 70s as "the golden age".  Fair or unfair, the older stuff just doesn't speak to them.  Then again, they never had it around when they were young, so they can't really relate to it.  On the other hand, the Beatles have been in the mix since they first released their stuff.

I like 60s and 70s music too. My point is nobody's pointing to this time in the 2010s as the best era of music ever.

Except Eric who likes Bieber, which is OK.  I just don't have to play it.   Of course there is awesome stuff to be had on youtube.





I think it's more of who the taking heads decide is the stuff "worth listening to."   So give this a try and see if it sounds sort of like the circa 1970 stuff, which yes, is awesome.


The 1970's in general, is an awesome decade wrt "bad jams".









So, yeah, ah to be 17 again where one's body can absorb the party hearty lifestyle.

Oh, and this ?   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gx5DhKN_zY

    'sville , man.