03-14-2017, 04:31 AM
(03-13-2017, 08:19 PM)Kinser79 Wrote:(03-13-2017, 07:54 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:(03-13-2017, 07:45 PM)SomeGuy Wrote:(03-13-2017, 07:41 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:(03-13-2017, 07:38 PM)SomeGuy Wrote: I'll be sure not to reply to you anymore, then.
That's OK. I still reserve the right to reply to you.
In which case I reserve the right to respond to you, even unto your annoyance.
And so we come full circle.
1. I think you got confused. I never said I'd not reply to you, but that I was not going to reply to Snowflake, which who I referring to with the noun , "bot".
2. Yes, quite. Although Snowflake was not in the reply chain , after I stated I would not reply to it.
Are we sure that this "Snowflake" is a bot?
And if we are sure there is evidence, yes?
Cause if it is indeed a bot....perhaps it can be corrupted. Artificial ignorance isn't as resistant as natural ignorance.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/microsoft-sh...cist-nazi/
inb4 "CBS is fake news"
That's really funny. #Hitchbot.