08-21-2017, 01:35 PM
(08-21-2017, 10:26 AM)David Horn Wrote:(08-20-2017, 01:43 PM)Kinser79 Wrote: I would argue that abolition of the electoral college would make our elections less democratic than more democratic. HRC may or may not have won the popular vote, but that doesn't matter, we have never elected the president on who wins the most votes, but who wins the most states.
The electoral college was created when we were "these united states", thinking that the states would continue to be quasi-independent. It was also intended to prevent a tyranny of the majority. Now, we are enjoying a tyranny of the minority -- certainly much worse.
When something is rotten, it needs to replaced. The electoral college certainly qualifies.
So what you're saying is you want the President selected by New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles and the other three or four major cities while the rest of the country is ignored. Got it.

It really is all mathematics.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out ofUN/NATO/WTO/TPP/NAFTA/CAFTA Globalism.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out of