06-06-2018, 12:49 PM
It's not that it's my model, it's the model proposed in the books and built upon here (amongst other places). The core underlying principle (my interpretation) is that as generations move into their new role in life (e.g. boomers into "elderhood"), a new turning is triggered. So for that to have happened, boomers would have to have taken over as the dominant gen in that stage.
I simply don't see how a crisis mood could have taken hold across the country when a significant portion of the leadership of the country was still held by the previous gen (silents).
I simply don't see how a crisis mood could have taken hold across the country when a significant portion of the leadership of the country was still held by the previous gen (silents).
"But there's a difference between error and dishonesty, and it's not a trivial difference." - Ben Greenman
"Relax, it'll be all right, and by that I mean it will first get worse."
"How was I supposed to know that there'd be consequences for my actions?" - Gina Linetti
"Relax, it'll be all right, and by that I mean it will first get worse."
"How was I supposed to know that there'd be consequences for my actions?" - Gina Linetti